As more and more people seek to experience the beauty and serenity of the coast, it’s become increasingly urgent to ensure the safety of all trail users as well as protection of nearby wildlife and sensitive habitats.
Half Moon Bay’s dilemma
Half Moon Bay councilmembers have been duly concerned about potential conflicts between fast-moving electric bikes and other users of the Coastal Trail, and have sought to limit e-bike riders to other, more suitable trails where there are fewer potential impacts to pedestrians and the natural environment.
However, at a recent workshop on e-bikes on city-owned trails and paths, the Half Moon Bay City Council was distressed to hear that a new state law, Assembly Bill 1909, had removed language allowing jurisdictions to regulate the use of Class 1, 2 and 3 e-bikes on the Coastal Trail. Although the effect of this change in the law remains a bit murky due to ambiguous language, the City Council felt obligated to abandon its previous efforts to ban e-bikes on this scenic recreational trail.
Why e-bikes are a concern on the Coastal Trail
E-bikes have become increasingly popular in recent years, raising concerns about the impacts of fast-moving motorized devices on other trail users.
Recommended for you
For many mobility impaired people, the presence of fast-moving e-bikes, e-scooters, motorized boards, etc. (to say nothing of speeding regular bikes) is too much of a risk. They can’t quickly jump out of the way, and older trail users will especially fear a collision or even a loss of balance, as falls are a leading cause of injury and death among seniors. Families with small children, and people who seek a quieter connection with nature are similarly discouraged or excluded when e-bikes are present. As a result, a significant segment of our population is currently “recreationally displaced” from the Coastal Trail in Half Moon Bay.
A solution that accommodates everyone
The Half Moon Bay City Council is considering an ingenious solution to this dilemma: a redesigned Coastal Trail on separate, parallel alignments that would have different surfaces: 1). a path for walkers, runners and people who are mobility-challenged, with a permeable, compacted surface such as decomposed granite, and 2). an adjacent paved trail for faster moving bikes and e-bikes. An existing adjacent, unpaved equestrian trail would continue to accommodate horses. The redesigned trail would ideally include turnouts and overlooks where people can stop to enjoy ocean views and the restorative benefits of nature.
The benefits of this trail redesign would not only provide pedestrians with a safer and more peaceful trail experience, it would also provide maximum public access for all users, as mandated by the California Coastal Act. Half Moon Bay’s local coastal plan also supports equitable access for all on the Coastal Trail, requiring that “public access and recreational opportunities account for the social, physical and economic needs of all people.”
The California Coastal Trail, now about 70% complete, is an integrated network of trails that, when completed, will provide an opportunity to hike and bike the length of California’s 1,230-mile coastline.
Santa Cruz has already created safe and separate pedestrian and bike paths along two segments of its Coastal Trail; at Twin Lakes State Beach and Pleasure Point Parkway. Hopefully, Half Moon Bay will not be far behind in achieving equitable access, so everyone will be able to safely enjoy the beauty of the city’s Coastal Trail.
Lennie Roberts is the legislative advocate for Green Foothills.
I'm also distressed that the CA legislature would ban cities from regulating motorized e-bikes on nature trails, and I fear it set's a dangerous precedent for nature trails statewide. Already many hiking seniors and families are displaced from trails due to conflicts with bikes which, even ridden safely, travel at 5 times the speed of a walker.
I'm sorry to see yet another parallel trail - this one asphalt paved - added through sensitive natural habitat, further disrupting wildlife and the natural ecosystem that many of us come to appreciate. Further, most trail settings - hills, canyons, forests - don't have the space for an added paved trail without severely disrupting natural habitats.
E-bikes are motorized technology. Can't we have some places in our industrialized, concrete, and tech-permeated world where technology is NOT permitted, and the rights of nature - the wildlife and the small remaining habitat we've left them - prevail?
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(2) comments
I'm also distressed that the CA legislature would ban cities from regulating motorized e-bikes on nature trails, and I fear it set's a dangerous precedent for nature trails statewide. Already many hiking seniors and families are displaced from trails due to conflicts with bikes which, even ridden safely, travel at 5 times the speed of a walker.
I'm sorry to see yet another parallel trail - this one asphalt paved - added through sensitive natural habitat, further disrupting wildlife and the natural ecosystem that many of us come to appreciate. Further, most trail settings - hills, canyons, forests - don't have the space for an added paved trail without severely disrupting natural habitats.
E-bikes are motorized technology. Can't we have some places in our industrialized, concrete, and tech-permeated world where technology is NOT permitted, and the rights of nature - the wildlife and the small remaining habitat we've left them - prevail?
How would that be enforced?
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.