Mike Nagler

In college, I used to call home once a week, on Sunday nights. My parents wanted a report, and, I’m sure, I never gave them as full of an account as they wanted. How could I? I was living away from home for the first time — in Santa Barbara — and that meant that I could do things that were not going to be reported to my parents.

But, this particular call was made midweek, because my mother was running for reelection to the elementary school board in San Mateo and it was election night. The race was supposed to be very close because she’d helped lead an integration plan in the district, and many folks were upset. I still have a yellowed newspaper article about how a group of these angry parents had formed something called “The San Mateo Citizens to Save Neighborhood Schools.” They’d hired legal counsel to pursue the case in Superior Court.

As I recall, the local paper did not endorse my mother.

“So, how’d you do?” I asked her on the phone.

“I lost,” she replied.

I was stunned. It had never crossed my mind that she’d lose. I thought the cause she espoused was just. That the elimination of racial barriers that led to more equitable education for all students — no matter the color of their skin — was the hallmark of a community that supported the diversity of all its voices. And as a college student in the 1960s, I believed that the just cause should and would always triumph.

I was very young.

“Everyone has a right to their opinion and their vote,” she said.

I remember that particular sentence as if she’d said it yesterday.

“Well, maybe they shouldn’t,” I stupidly replied.

“Don’t be silly,” she said. “What sort of classes are we paying for down there, anyway?”

As it turned out, several days later, after a recount, the result was reversed and my mother eked out a victory.

The first election I can remember was in 1956 when Adlai Stevenson ran against President Eisenhower. This was the second time they had competed against one another and, like the first time, Stevenson lost in a landslide.

My parents, loyal Democrats, had not only voted for Stevenson but canvassed their neighborhood in support of him. They did this knowing he had absolutely no chance of victory. But whether or not their candidate won, they considered it a crucial characteristic of American character — the most crucial characteristic — that America’s citizens get to see things differently, that every voice matters, every vote matters, and recognizing this is the most essential bond that holds our country together.

Since 2010, nearly half the states have passed laws that make it harder to vote, from restrictions on early and absentee voting, to fewer hours to vote at polls, to eliminating thousands of polling places and ballot drop boxes, all this targeting specific neighborhoods. Some elected officials have actually commented that they believe too many people are voting, that it’s bad for our democracy.

They might as well be saying that it’s bad for us to have too much air to breathe.

My brother David and his wife recently told me how their 3-year-old granddaughter has taken to saying “No” every few minutes, and “I’m mad because you didn’t do what I want.” They have to remind themselves that it’s not about her testing their patience, but rather wanting to have some control over her world, about finding her voice and making her place. About how she’s actually just trying to vote.

In a world of grown-ups — our world — not having the opportunity to vote, and thus impact the things in our lives that are meaningful to us, would be like silencing that little girl’s voice, not letting her speak. Not allowing her to have a voice that can impact her own life.

Nobody should have their voice silenced. Silencing a voice takes that person’s power away — and voting is power. It is inextricably connected to our souls, our values, even our self-esteem.

After speaking to my brother, I found myself sitting next to my now 99-year-old mother, as she lie in bed, drifting in and out of sleep.

When she awakened momentarily, I asked her if she could remember the first time she’d voted in a presidential election.

She stared at the ceiling, as if that was the place her memories were kept.

“1944,” she replied. “I voted for Franklin Roosevelt. And he won, by the way,” she added.

I listened to her voice, that voice that had so inspired my own beliefs — as well as my brother’s — and then I watched as she slowly closed her eyes and fell back to sleep.

Mike Nagler is a trustee on the Burlingame Library Board.

Recommended for you

(11) comments

Terence Y

Mr. Nagler, nice story, but where is proof (anecdotes aren’t proof) that voter ID laws cause voter suppression. After all, didn’t a supposedly record number of people vote for bungling Biden during this last election? One has to wonder whether all of those votes were valid. Also why do you need ID to fly on an airplane, drive a car, buy cigarettes, alcohol, open a bank account, lease an apartment, etc. but you don’t need ID to vote. If voting is as important as you say, shouldn’t we ensure election integrity and make sure everyone’s vote counts, only once? Or is cheating and stealing an election, to wit the recent Presidential election, more important than election integrity?

Cindy Cornell

And soon you won't even have to register to buy and carry a gun in Texas. Woohoo! But, aside from that, I'll tell you a story about a friend who grew up in Tennessee and was one of "Bobby's Girls" in Robert Kennedy's campaign for President. When she went to cast her vote there were two boxes - one for Republicans and one for Democrats. She told the woman to put her ballot in the Democrat box, and the poll worker smiled and tore the ballot in half and threw it in the trash in front of her. I guess you wouldn't understand or be aware of the varieties of voter suppression unless you lived it.

Terence Y

Ms. Cornell, even though you will soon not have to register and can open carry in Texas, you still need to show a valid state or federal ID to buy a gun. If we don’t want IDs for election integrity, why do we need IDs for anything else? Thanks for your anecdote, but is this really voter suppression? After all, your friend easily cast a vote. Maybe voter intimidation is the more apt category. BTW, Texas is about to become the 20th state that allows constitutional carry. We can only hope it expands to the entire United States.

Dirk van Ulden

Cindy - is that the same as bringing in boxes of previously unknown ballots favoring Biden as was done in Michigan, Arizona and Georgia?


Congratulations Terence,

You got one right about the recent Presidential election. If it wasn't for the right wing cheating and voter suppression, Biden would have won by ten million votes rather than seven million. BTW, find any bamboo fibers yet?

Terence Y

Unsurprisingly, Taffy is unable to provide proof of voter suppression. Instead, we get – actually I’m not sure what we get. Some kind of nonsense explanation which when you think about it, becomes less and less logical. Meanwhile, in other news, another audit in Georgia is moving ahead. Mainstream media outlets are now reporting, a year later, that our great President Trump was right about the origins of COVID. Better late than never, I suppose. Maybe some of these mainstream media folks were unable to take advanced math classes and they’ve finally reached the class where they learn 2+2=4.


Where in the column did you see anything about voter ID laws?


madden, Mr/Ms?

There was mention of voter suppression and that triggered his automatic response that the the election was rigged, stolen etc. Terence is a card carrying member of the Trump won the election society. If you haven't seen his comments, click on his moniker and look at some of his fantasies.

Terence Y

Madden, anytime someone brings up the subject of voter suppression, it inevitably leads to voter ID laws and how they supposedly restrict voting rights. In a simple search for “voter suppression” the super majority of articles will reference voter ID. If the column wasn’t meant to possibly spur a voter suppression conversation, then any references of harder to vote, restrictions, not having the opportunity to vote, etc. could have been easily removed and the storylines would have been more entertaining.


Again, all I'm saying is though "the super majority of articles will reference voter ID" this particular piece doesn't. You do.

Terence Y

Madden – all I’m saying is Mr. Nagler opened the door so I walked through. The door could have easily remained shut.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.

Thank you for visiting the Daily Journal.

Please purchase an Enhanced Subscription to continue reading. To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.

We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.

A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!