Even as some states and localities are “reopening” businesses and public spaces, it is likely that the COVID-19 pandemic will still be with us in November when Americans will elect a president, the entire membership of the U.S. House and more than a third of the U.S. Senate.
It is past time for Congress to require states to expand opportunities for voting by mail and early voting — and to help pay for those changes — so that Americans on Nov. 3 aren’t faced with a choice between protecting their health and exercising the most important right of citizens in a democracy.
That was the grim dilemma encountered by voters in Wisconsin’s April 7 election, when — despite social distancing and other precautions — dozens of voters and poll workers may have been infected at polling places. It’s vital that Congress act now to prevent voters across the country from encountering a similar situation in November, which could lower turnout as well as spread disease.
Congress included $400 million for state election systems in a coronavirus stimulus package approved in March. But that sum falls far short of what is required to make it possible for states — especially those that lack experience with extensive voting by mail — to prepare for an election in which most votes might have to be cast by that method.
The House passed a new coronavirus relief bill Friday that would give state election systems $3.6 billion to respond to the pandemic — a sum much closer to estimates by outside election experts of what will be required to conduct elections during this crisis. But Congress must act quickly; according to an analysis by the Brennan Center for Justice, states will have to start preparing this month if they’re going to be ready for voting by mail in the fall.
It’s also important that states take precautions to protect the health of voters who will cast their ballots in person, an option that must remain for disabled voters and those with unreliable mail delivery. Generous arrangements for early voting will reduce congestion at polling places, and election officials also must be prepared to sanitize those locations to protect the health of voters and poll workers.
Recommended for you
Shoring up election systems to respond to the pandemic should be a bipartisan cause. But while some Republican governors recognize the importance of expanding voting by mail, Republicans in Washington haven’t risen to the occasion. Some GOP senators have expressed concern about a “federal takeover of the election process.” President Trump has called voting by mail a “terrible thing,” complained that it hurts Republicans, and suggested without offering proof that expanding the practice could lead to massive fraud. (Never mind that Trump voted by absentee ballot in Florida’s primary.)
Alarmism about a “federal takeover” of elections ignores the Constitution‘s instruction that, while states are responsible for the “time, places and manner” of congressional elections, Congress may “at any time make or alter such regulations.” Congress also has legislated regulations for presidential elections. It would be shameful if Republicans refused to exercise that authority to make it easier for Americans to vote during a public-health crisis. But then, the GOP in recent years has been the party trying to make it harder to cast a ballot.
Sen. Amy Klobuchar (D-Minn.), who along with Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) introduced a separate bill to help states expand voting by mail, suggested that there could be negotiations with Republicans if they showed interest, though she said she would oppose any provisions that would suppress the right to vote.
Some compromises might be acceptable. While the problem of fraud in absentee voting is vastly exaggerated, occasional abuses have occurred. Some Republicans might be willing to support expanded voting by mail in exchange for a requirement that states minimize the possibility of fraud and error, including by placing limits on so-called “ballot harvesting,” the collection and delivery of multiple ballots by activists or party members. That’s a reasonable compromise.
But if Republicans in the Senate erect too many obstacles to an expansion of voting by mail and other measures to safeguard voting in this extraordinarily emergency, they will face the judgment of history — and of the voters they disenfranchised or endangered. They will play politics with this issue at their peril.
Members of Congress of both parties have recognized that the COVID-19 contagion requires new thinking. If the damage inflicted on the economy by the virus justified a massive federal response, so does the threat the pandemic poses to democracy. Time is running out.
An excellent editorial with at least 7 good points. That means there is at least 7 reasons for Moscow Mitch McConnell and the 51 other spineless senators to oppose it and obstruct its implementation.
Look at how well San Mateo has done with all mail in voting. We don’t see final results as thousands of votes are not tabulated for weeks. When we had live precinct voting, votes were tabulated instantly and visual verification (a polling place volunteer saw you) is made. When “mail-in” becomes the norm, it will be important to minimize fraud potential by not allowing “ballot harvesting” or collection except by election officials. It will also mean more funding for election offices for faster tabulation on Election Day(s).
I may have missed something when I read your comment. Are you saying you are for mail-in balloting or against it? You mention the Republican buzz word "ballot harvesting" and also say that it would mean more funding for the election offices. The paranoid President seems to think it will mean thousands and thousands of fraudulent votes even though the only real cases of major fraud were by the Republicans in North Carolina with Mark Harris, I hope not a relative.
I favor mail-in because in the bay area or California in general many people work hours from where they live making it impractical to vote in person and it makes it easier for disabled, elderly etc.
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(3) comments
An excellent editorial with at least 7 good points. That means there is at least 7 reasons for Moscow Mitch McConnell and the 51 other spineless senators to oppose it and obstruct its implementation.
Look at how well San Mateo has done with all mail in voting. We don’t see final results as thousands of votes are not tabulated for weeks. When we had live precinct voting, votes were tabulated instantly and visual verification (a polling place volunteer saw you) is made. When “mail-in” becomes the norm, it will be important to minimize fraud potential by not allowing “ballot harvesting” or collection except by election officials. It will also mean more funding for election offices for faster tabulation on Election Day(s).
Hello Mike,
I may have missed something when I read your comment. Are you saying you are for mail-in balloting or against it? You mention the Republican buzz word "ballot harvesting" and also say that it would mean more funding for the election offices. The paranoid President seems to think it will mean thousands and thousands of fraudulent votes even though the only real cases of major fraud were by the Republicans in North Carolina with Mark Harris, I hope not a relative.
I favor mail-in because in the bay area or California in general many people work hours from where they live making it impractical to vote in person and it makes it easier for disabled, elderly etc.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.