As development and infrastructure projects wend their way through a city’s approval process, the city periodically publishes updated versions of the project’s plans on its website. As someone who is keenly interested in projects like these, I keep an eye out for those updates — not only do they indicate that the mostly private negotiations between the city and the developer are making progress, they also show the give-and-take arising from those negotiations.
Rarely does a project go from initial proposal to final approval without at least one noteworthy change. Often, it’s easy to predict when a project is likely to undergo one or more changes just by looking at the initial proposal. Take the senior market-rate housing project proposed for 910 Marshall St. and two adjoining parcels, for instance. At 27 stories — 310 feet to the top of the project’s highest tower — it was clear that even though the project was submitted under Senate Bill 330 (which restricts the city’s ability to impose restrictions), it wasn’t at all likely to be approved as is. And indeed, the project recently underwent a radical redesign that caused it to shrink significantly.
Originally, the idea was to combine three lots and construct two tall towers (the second being 19 stories, or nearly 228 feet tall) that together would contain 378 apartments, 70,000 square feet of space for residential amenities, 2,800 square feet of retail and parking for 164 vehicles. Now, however, the project will no longer span multiple parcels but will stand solely on the one parcel at 910 Marshall St., where, today, Kaiser Permanente has a single-story medical office. Replacing Kaiser’s building would be a single 21-story tower — 258 feet in height — containing 222 apartments, a little over 33,000 square feet for amenities, 1,210 square feet of retail and a two-level internal parking garage containing 95 parking spaces (24 of which would be served by valet). As before, the building would be exclusively for seniors and would include a memory care facility.
This project remains under the auspices of SB 330, which continues to give it a lot of leeway. But 21 stories is still substantially beyond the city’s eight-story maximum for that parcel, so it’ll be interesting to see how this project progresses. At least it lies within the city’s downtown, where you’d expect to find taller buildings. It is also a reasonable distance from Redwood City’s Courthouse Square, so, if built as currently proposed, it wouldn’t overshadow the historic building. I do expect some further pushback, though, since the proposed building is more than twice the height of the tallest building in Redwood City today. Then again, 222 apartments — none of which would be affordable, sadly — would be hard to say no to.
Four blocks away, but still on Marshall Street, another housing project proposal — also submitted under SB 330, as it turns out — also underwent a recent update. This would be a much smaller, more conventional project: 32 for-sale condominiums (five affordable at the moderate-income level) to be built at 1320 Marshall St., where today there is one large single-story building that fronts onto Broadway. Dubbed “Redwood Square,” this project would consist of four four-story buildings. Two of the buildings would stretch side by side along Broadway while the remaining two would stand end-on to Marshall Street.
Originally, the two buildings along Broadway would have been a single building stretching the entire width of the property. All of the buildings would have had an industrial feel, being faced with various flat slabs of stucco and metal vertical siding and having flat roofs. Now, the buildings are being given something of a Spanish feel, with rounded arches and sloping red tile roofs.
Except for the two units bordering Marshall Street, the condominiums in this development are slated to be narrow and laid out somewhat unusually. At ground level, each would have a narrow garage accommodating two cars nose to tail. The living spaces above are designed to span two of these garages, making those spaces 22 feet wide. But those living spaces would be divided between two units vertically, with the entirety of the second floor and roughly one-third of the third floor being dedicated to one unit, and the remaining one-third of the third floor and the entirety of the fourth floor being dedicated to another. Thus, one of the units will be one flight up from the garage with two of another unit’s bedrooms above its master suite, while the other unit would begin two flights up from the garage with no one above any of its bedrooms.
Like so many, both projects are making good visible progress, thanks to the recently published updated plans on Redwood City’s Development Projects website. I look forward to following their continued progress and will be interested to see how the final projects — if built — compare with their developer’s original vision.
Greg Wilson is the creator of Walking Redwood City, a blog inspired by his walks throughout Redwood City and adjacent communities. He can be reached at greg@walkingRedwoodCity.com. Follow Greg on Twitter @walkingRWC.
(0) comments
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.