Similar to many other Peninsula cities, South San Francisco approved a budget that will draw on its reserves to close a budget shortfall, partly attributable to an unstable revenue source and increased operating costs.
The City Council unanimously adopted a $162.4 million operating budget for 2026-27 fiscal year, drawing on $5.5 million of reserves to close its shortfall. If the state legislature passes Assembly Bill 109 on Monday, June 15, however, the deficit might be reduced by at least a few million dollars, Assistant City Manager Rich Lee said.
That’s because the main financial hit the city is taking is related to a revenue source tied to vehicle license fees, a complicated reimbursement that the state historically provides to Peninsula cities each year, however, most jurisdictions have failed to receive the full amounts over the last couple years. That has triggered a lawsuit between the county and state, and as a result, many cities, including South City, have had to lower their projected VLF revenue or remove it from their budget estimates altogether.
If the bill passes, the county could receive at least $77 million, about $3.4 million of which would likely go to South City.
“If that did come to fruition and assuming all other assumptions with the budget remain true, our shortfall for the general fund would go from $5.5 million to $2.1 million,” Lee said.
Recommended for you
It’s not uncommon for the county to get at least a partial reimbursement from the state, but it’s often at the eleventh hour.
“If we get these funds, then it’s less that we use from our unassigned fund balance so it buys us more time, but the bottom line is we need a legislative fix,” Lee said. “Going back every year is politically exhausting.”
Without the reimbursement, the city projects $156.9 in revenue and $162.4 in expenses. According to a previous presentation at a council meeting, revenue from the city’s transient occupancy, or hotel, tax came in about $2 million higher than anticipated, and unsecured property tax — which covers business equipment rather than real estate — is close to $2 million, a major increase.
Other cities, including Redwood City and San Mateo, also plan to draw on reserves to shore up their projected deficits.
The council also supported a $19.3 million capital improvement budget — which funds infrastructure projects and is separate from the operating budget — and includes 150 projects across a number of categories, including parks, road repairs and storm drains. Some of those include the Linden Avenue Park, Centennial Trail improvements, Caltrain station enhancements and bike and pedestrian lane projects.
See folks. Nothing to worry about. South San Francisco will have plenty of money. As such, be sure to vote NO on any tax proposals transferring your money to ever-increasing union salaries, pensions, and benefits.
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(1) comment
See folks. Nothing to worry about. South San Francisco will have plenty of money. As such, be sure to vote NO on any tax proposals transferring your money to ever-increasing union salaries, pensions, and benefits.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.