South San Francisco is expanding its original set of priorities to include an air quality assessment, a robust communications plan regarding the city’s in-lieu vehicle license fee shortfall and exploring building code changes for new construction.
The city had previously agreed on a number of priorities earlier this year, but during an April meeting, council requested expanding the list. One of the tasks was to investigate pollution levels after it was revealed some census tracts there, particularly Old Town, downtown and east of Highway 101, have some of the Bay Area’s worst pollution burden scores, according to the most recent state CalEnviroScreen data.
“I want to … be able to engage with our legislators, both Senator Becker and Assemblymember Papan, to see if there is appetite or if there is space in conversations to designate that area of town as a special vulnerable community,” Councilmember Eddie Flores said during a recent City Council meeting.
Another priority is constructing a community outreach plan surrounding potential service cuts due to the loss of a key revenue source from the state. San Mateo County and its cities have long struggled with the unique bureaucratic mechanisms that deploy what’s known as in-lieu vehicle license fee funding. A 2004 change in the distribution system of VLF, which comes from taxes on California vehicles, tied reimbursement to county property tax revenue and the county’s school districts. But because the setup of San Mateo County’s existing educational revenue structures doesn’t qualify the county for the full in-lieu VLF amount, representatives are left to haggle for the money each year. More recently, the state has entirely removed the line item from its budget.
South San Francisco’s share is about $5 million annually, but according to a recent presentation, the figure will likely grow to $14 million each year by fiscal year 2032.
“This is a wonky issue that not a lot of people know about,” Councilmember James Coleman said. “In a couple of years, we’ll be forced to make some tough decisions … once we do that, I think our constituents, our residents, should know why.”
The council also decided to further explore implementation of stronger reach codes, or building codes that go beyond state-level mandates, to incentivize electrification.
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(0) comments
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.