Last year, Waymo expanded its services, albeit limited, to San Mateo County, prompting a mix of both excited and concerned responses.
David Canepa
The San Mateo County Board of Supervisors was vocal in its pursuit to gain more local control over how autonomous vehicles were deployed in its jurisdictions. It passed a resolution in support of Senate Bill 915, which aimed to entrust cities with more authority over AV operations, and it also filed an amicus brief in support of San Francisco’s decision to sue the California Public Utilities Commission over the regulator’s decision to approve Waymo and Cruise expansion.
Waymo launched rides for employees in parts of San Mateo County — mostly the northern part of the Peninsula — last May and expanded its public ride-hailing service to Daly City, Colma and Broadmoor in August. Since then, according to data from the California Department of Motor Vehicles, there have been two collision reports involving Waymo in San Mateo County. One occurred in February in Brisbane, though, according to the report, the incident was minor and did not appear to be initiated by the Waymo car. The other occurred in South City in October and also did not appear initiated by Waymo. Statewide, about 45 collision reports involving Waymo have been reported to the DMV since August 2024.
Dave Canepa, president of the San Mateo County Board of Supervisors, was vocal in his concerns with Waymo’s expansion to the Peninsula last year, but is now a frequent user and supporter of the cars.
“I have a thousand problems, and Waymo isn’t one of them,” Canepa said. “Waymo has really stepped up their game … I take Waymo once a week now, and I feel very safe.”
Recommended for you
While some residents are still skeptical, many have also come around to the new technology. San Mateo resident Juda Tolmasoff hasn’t taken a driverless taxi before, mostly relying on public transportation, but said she understands why it’s appealing for others.
“I am a senior citizen, so the Clipper Card is very economical for me,” Tolmasoff said. “I’ve got the luxury to do it because I've got the time to do it. If people need access to other alternatives, if that makes their life less stressful, I’m happy for them, and I’m happy for me that I’ve got my bus, and it's working for me.”
Millbrae resident Carble Cheung said he was concerned about previous situations in which Tesla autopilot settings may have caused accidents, but he’s been pleasantly surprised by how much safer he feels in a Waymo compared to an Uber or Lyft.
“If Waymo gets in an accident, it becomes really big news and everything falls apart,” Cheung said. “It makes some weird mistakes when it doesn't know [certain things], but over time things get better … I felt way more safe in Waymo with my wife and daughter than with my Uber driver who was constantly looking at their phone.”
Still, he knows there can be limitations and learning curves. For instance, there are many suburban two-way streets with cars parked on each side. Human drivers know that one driver should pull off to the side to let the other through on a narrow street like that, but autonomous vehicles may have more difficulty.
“Until something better or something horrible happens, this is the reality of where we are,” Cheung said. “It’s still new technology, and the culture of San Francisco and the greater Bay Area of accepting and adopting this new form of transportation, I think, it’s worked out great.”
The safety data looks fairly favorable for Waymo (Google) and Zoox (Amazon). Both feature level 4, some would say almost level 5 Autonomous Driving capabilities and especially in areas where they have been around for a while. There biggest safety advantage over human drivers is that they don't speed and have several levels of redundant "eye-sight".
They can not and should not be compared to Tesla's FSD or autopilot, which is barely a level 2. FSD is allowed to speed and has killed drivers, passengers, and pedestrians - and sure stupidity on the driver is part of the problem. But no car company should be allowed to call anything Full-Self-Driving Mode if you still have to have your hands on the steering wheel - that is at best an Enhanced Cruise Control.
Btw. Mercedes and other legacy car companies are already level 3. Tesla is only ahead in marketing these days, but not in technology anymore. Their biggest problem like regular humans Tesla only relies on cameras and eye-sight, while the other companies might use lidar, radar, ultrasound, cameras, etc.
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(2) comments
The safety data looks fairly favorable for Waymo (Google) and Zoox (Amazon). Both feature level 4, some would say almost level 5 Autonomous Driving capabilities and especially in areas where they have been around for a while. There biggest safety advantage over human drivers is that they don't speed and have several levels of redundant "eye-sight".
They can not and should not be compared to Tesla's FSD or autopilot, which is barely a level 2. FSD is allowed to speed and has killed drivers, passengers, and pedestrians - and sure stupidity on the driver is part of the problem. But no car company should be allowed to call anything Full-Self-Driving Mode if you still have to have your hands on the steering wheel - that is at best an Enhanced Cruise Control.
Btw. Mercedes and other legacy car companies are already level 3. Tesla is only ahead in marketing these days, but not in technology anymore. Their biggest problem like regular humans Tesla only relies on cameras and eye-sight, while the other companies might use lidar, radar, ultrasound, cameras, etc.
Bring Waymo to the rest of the county. Safer, cleaner and more reliable then other ride-share options.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.