San Mateo has received several development proposals over the last month, highlighting the city’s influx of development activity since it passed Measure T in November.
The city’s development pipeline now stands at roughly 4,000 units, more than half the city’s state-mandated housing goals, or Regional Housing Needs Allocation, which stipulates the city must plan for at least 7,015 housing units between 2023-31. Thirteen development proposals are using the Senate Bill 330 process, which aims to minimize public meetings and speed the approval process.
Two preliminary applications were recently submitted, one at 22 N. San Mateo Drive just north of Baldwin Avenue — which proposes a seven-story building with 162 housing units — and another at Pioneer Court, which proposes 10 new units.
Last month, a preliminary application for 220 W. 20th Ave. was filed and would require the demolition of an existing one-story office building and construction of a seven-story residential development with 230 units, 23 of which would be allocated for low-income households. The development at 1218 Monte Diablo Ave., at an old convenience store on the east side of Highway 101, would consist of 72 residential units, a combination of both townhomes and apartment units.
Rendering of the proposed development at 1218 Monte Diablo Ave. in San Mateo that would consist of 72 residential units.
Other cities have seen some application upticks since, as of last year, many finished adoption of their housing elements — state-mandated documents outlining how jurisdictions will achieve required housing mandates through a mix of zoning and other policy changes. Burlingame, for instance, has seen more development proposals in some of its industrial areas, said Jordan Grimes, State and Regional Resilience manager at Greenbelt Alliance, but San Mateo has certainly seen the most activity out of most Peninsula cities.
“There is an influx of projects in the city,” Grimes said. “So now that we have changed what you can build in San Mateo, unsurprisingly, people are taking advantage of that.”
Redwood City has only seen a few proposals, and South City, typically considered a pro-housing city, hasn’t seen any new residential developments come through so far this year.
Recommended for you
“Redwood City had their big San Mateo moment in 2011 when they redid their downtown plan, and the housing growth that came was largely a result of that rezoning, so San Mateo is having a similar experience now,” Grimes said.
Since the passage of Measure T — which increased height and density limits in several parts of the city, including near Caltrain stations — the city has seen a surge in large development proposals. Plans to demolish the Hillsdale Shopping Center and replace it with a mix of office buildings, retail stores and about 1,400 housing units were submitted in February. The developers of a proposal on South Amphlett Boulevard submitted their formal application in March, which included plans to demolish office buildings and construct about 250 residential units, a mix of townhomes and single-family houses. Updated plans for the 678 Concar Drive redevelopment were also submitted to the city this year, which would create about 869 housing units, as well as commercial spaces.
Tom Morgan, president of the neighborhood association group San Mateo United, said he feels Measure T is a factor in the application uptick but that the lending landscape was starting to pick up for developers this year anyway.
“Developers thought, ‘Maybe it makes sense for us to start putting applications in because financing is looking better,’” he said. “Coming in to the year, people expected interest rates to come down a bit, and then obviously everything got blown up in April with tariffs.”
He added that the residential development along corridors like El Camino Real and major public transit, like Caltrain stops, is beneficial. But he has some concern about the traffic safety for development proposals such as the West 20th Avenue and Monte Diablo Avenue projects.
“They are more in the neighborhoods, so it gets more challenging with safety … hopefully they make sure both those projects are going to be light on cars,” Morgan said. “We just saw the budget and capital investment needs … so it would be really good for the applicants to listen to the neighbors because they’ve lived here and made it a great place.”
But Grimes said San Mateo has likely seen the biggest uptick in development proposals of any city in the county so far this year, a testament to the pent-up demand for more housing.
“This phenomenon is unique to San Mateo,” he said. “There is a common refrain that cities don’t build housing, which is true, but they do set the conditions under which it can be built, and I think San Mateo is a good example of how potent and how powerful that is.”
This result shouldn’t be a surprise. If you open up height limits to allow higher stack and pack units, what developer wouldn’t want a piece of the action? Note that our supposed dearth of “affordable housing” isn’t mentioned in this article so maybe this isn’t a thing anymore. But of course, as long as developers can charge enough to make their investors a profit, they may throw in a few subsidized affordable market units for the lucky few that qualify. Maybe folks that will be evicted from their homes to make way for freeway improvements can trade for a high-rise place?
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(1) comment
This result shouldn’t be a surprise. If you open up height limits to allow higher stack and pack units, what developer wouldn’t want a piece of the action? Note that our supposed dearth of “affordable housing” isn’t mentioned in this article so maybe this isn’t a thing anymore. But of course, as long as developers can charge enough to make their investors a profit, they may throw in a few subsidized affordable market units for the lucky few that qualify. Maybe folks that will be evicted from their homes to make way for freeway improvements can trade for a high-rise place?
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.