Showers and a possible thunderstorm during the morning will give way to mostly cloudy skies this afternoon. High around 65F. Winds SSW at 10 to 20 mph. Chance of rain 100%..
Tonight
Considerable cloudiness with occasional rain showers. Low 54F. Winds SW at 10 to 15 mph. Chance of rain 50%.
According to a recent report, the percentage of fully-remote Bay Area workers has declined by about 20% between October 2021 to February 2025, with employees working in office an average of about three days per week.
The study, conducted by the Metropolitan Transportation Commission and Bay Area Council, surveyed an average of 171 employers from the nine Bay Area counties about their remote work approaches, employee sentiment and overall company outcomes in light of their office policies. About 32% of employees worked remote full time in October 2021, compared to 11% in February 2025.
Jeff Bellisario
Jeff Bellisario, executive director of the Bay Area Council Economic Institute, said the results align with many residents’ own observations, especially surrounding traffic patterns. Tuesdays, Wednesdays and Thursdays are the most popular office working days, while Mondays and Fridays were when many employees on a hybrid schedule worked from home.
“The overall takeaway — that the number of days spent in an office among these employers is incrementally going up, particularly in the last 18 months — is not necessarily surprising to me,” Bellisario said.
What’s been more surprising, he said, is that more than 90% of surveyed employers found that their in-office and hybrid models were somewhat or very effective in achieving desired outcomes.
“It does cut against some of the narrative out there, that companies are putting these mandates in place but employees are not necessarily following those requirements, which doesn’t really seem to be the case,” he said.
The survey helps inform transportation patterns, which has been particularly salient for transit agencies, including MTC, as they contemplate funding mechanisms and measures to help narrow large deficits from major operators like Caltrain and BART, many of which have failed to meaningfully recover ridership since the pandemic. The former’s ridership, for instance, still hasn’t reached half of its pre-pandemic weekday average.
Recommended for you
“There is no massive new bump of ridership that we would expect to come from return-to-office mandates. The massive bumps would be from the vacant office space being sold up by new companies or growing companies moving in and not really the call back to the office,” Bellisario said.
There were also clear differences among small and large employers. Of firms with more than 10,000 employees, 40% intend to increase the number of in-office work days over the next six months, while just 10% of businesses with 25 or fewer employees are doing so, the report said.
While the study didn’t break down results by county, Bellisario said it’s more likely that employers on the Peninsula have stronger in-office policies compared to places like San Francisco.
“In San Mateo and Santa Clara counties, there is much more of a campus footprint for many of these employers, especially the largest ones. Given the amount of money invested in those types of campuses … there is a stronger desire to have people in those places and working face to face,” Bellisario said.
While the trend toward more in-office work days is clear, Bellisario said he still does not anticipate a five-day-per-week return to office any time soon.
“Our region is very much dependent on the tech economy, and the tech economy has gone to greater levels of remote work compared to other areas,” he said. “I think there is a hesitancy to call folks back because the economy has not totally broken, and our companies are still innovating, so there is some sweet spot that is less than five days per week going forward.”
How about if MTC just releases the slush funds they allegedly created by rerouting bridge tolls that should have gone to these transportation agencies. David Canepa and Gina Papan (San Mateo County) apparently did not pay much attention when MTC staff took transportation funding for finance car and real estate projects. San Mateo's senator Josh Becker has been quiet on this topic while State Sen. Dave Cortese (D-San Jose) asked the state auditor for an audit:
All the while SamTrans, BART, and Caltrain keep spending more and more while customer service isn't keeping track.
SamTrans, where are our 1,200 bus shelters, benches, and digital signage like other agencies have? Measure A and W are enough to pay for all of that.
Caltrain choose a $80M specialized train solution that would have paid for 6 regular trains with cars.
BART's tunnel solution is exploding in cost, because they start from the wrong side and chose the wrong solution. They should get help from Europe or China where they still have engineers.
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(1) comment
How about if MTC just releases the slush funds they allegedly created by rerouting bridge tolls that should have gone to these transportation agencies. David Canepa and Gina Papan (San Mateo County) apparently did not pay much attention when MTC staff took transportation funding for finance car and real estate projects. San Mateo's senator Josh Becker has been quiet on this topic while State Sen. Dave Cortese (D-San Jose) asked the state auditor for an audit:
https://www.cbsnews.com/sanfrancisco/news/mtc-bay-area-toll-authority-state-sen-dave-cortese-seeks-audit-toll-hikes/
All the while SamTrans, BART, and Caltrain keep spending more and more while customer service isn't keeping track.
SamTrans, where are our 1,200 bus shelters, benches, and digital signage like other agencies have? Measure A and W are enough to pay for all of that.
Caltrain choose a $80M specialized train solution that would have paid for 6 regular trains with cars.
BART's tunnel solution is exploding in cost, because they start from the wrong side and chose the wrong solution. They should get help from Europe or China where they still have engineers.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.