A plan to develop four lots into a 40-unit condominium complex in the neighborhood north of State Route 92 received approval from the San Mateo Planning Commission last night.
The complex will be built on the lots at 20 and 30 Madison Ave. and 25 and 29 Hobart Ave. It will preserve two historical homes on the site, provide underground parking and offer below-market units. Opponents, however, argue the addition of a high-density development will bring more traffic to the small neighborhood and set an alarming precedent.
"Approving projects on a piecemeal basis will lead to over-development," said Liz Titus, an Aragon Boulevard resident.
Commissioners heard testimony from just a handful of residents, two residents opposing the project and three supporting it. If residents are upset with the zoning in their neighborhood, they should attend general planning meetings and argue for reduced zoning, Commissioner Brandt Grotte said.
Otherwise, it is the Planning Commission's job to approve projects based on compliance with San Mateo ordinances and make sure high-density projects don't end up in the poorer neighborhoods, added Commissioner Robert Gooyer.
Gooyer, Grotte and Commissioner Torin Knorr voted in favor of the project because of its proximity to State Route 92, Highway 101 and the Hayward Park train station. They also agreed that the project does a good job of preserving two historical homes on the site.
Recommended for you
"We're getting out of it some of the best historical preservation I've ever seen," Grotte said.
The vote was delayed as the commission weighed the consequences of one-level underground parking. An original plan called for a smaller area to be developed into two levels of underground parking. The approved proposal calls for one level of underground parking to reach between three and five feet from the property line. The construction of the extended underground parking will require the removal of two trees and prohibit the types of trees that can be planted in the small section on the surface above the parking garage.
The one dissenting vote belonged to Commissioner Bertha Sanchez, who argued high-density development is threatening to ruin San Mateo.
"Just because we need housing in San Mateo doesn't mean we need high-density development," she said. "San Mateo is a built-out city, we know that."
Commission Chair Fred Hansson was absent from the meeting.
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(0) comments
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.