SACRAMENTO — California’s largest utility came under fire from state lawmakers Monday for billing practices associated with its "smart-meter program,” which has generated nearly 1,000 customer complaints to regulators.
Members of the state Senate took Pacific Gas & Electric Co. to task over the 3-year-old initiative, which uses electronic data, rather than meter readers, to determine customers’ monthly gas and electric use.
Advocates say smart meters will lower bills, improve billing accuracy and help customers make better-informed decisions about their energy use. Other utilities in the state also are trying the devices, though on a smaller scale than PG&E.
But state Sen. Dean Florez, D-Shafter, said many of his Central Valley constituents are complaining of skyrocketing costs and bill estimates that exceed what they owe.
He said Monday’s hearing of the Senate Select Committee on the Smart Grid would be the first of several to address possible flaws in the smart-meter system.
"This is a revolt,” Florez said of the angry customers. "The tea party has nothing on smart meters in the Central Valley.”
The program covers 5.5 million households, primarily in the valley and the San Francisco Bay Area, according to PG&E spokesman Paul Moreno. It will be expanded to about 9.8 million customers in 2012, he said.
PG&E said the meters have shown 99 percent accuracy and that bill estimates are a relatively rare occurrence.
Since the program rolled out in September 2007, only 0.2 percent of smart-meter bills have been estimates, compared to 0.7 percent of traditional meter bills, said Helen Burt, PG&E senior vice president and chief customer officer, who testified Monday.
"Our billing estimate rate is getting better, and our actual estimates are getting more accurate,” Burt said. "Smart-meter technology is actually saving people money.”
PG&E reports its smart-meter data monthly to the California Public Utilities Commission, which has assigned an independent audit of the program. The report is scheduled to be completed in August.
The commission’s director, Paul Clanon, said the audit was necessary to address the almost 1,000 complaints he and his colleagues have received from smart-meter customers. All but about two dozen of the complaints were from PG&E customers, he said, and mainly from people in the valley.
"One thousand complaints might be a relatively small number,” he said Monday. "But one bad meter, one bad bill is one too many.”
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.
Already a subscriber? Login Here
Dirk van Ulden said:
I am trying to figure out who Bobby Lee is. Why shouldn't we have a special day for Mark Olbert, another confused individual?
CoastalBoy said:
Success! An email has been sent to with a link to confirm list signup.
Error! There was an error processing your request.
Sorry, an error occurred.
Already Subscribed!
Cancel anytime
Thank you .
Your account has been registered, and you are now logged in.
Check your email for details.
Submitting this form below will send a message to your email with a link to change your password.
An email message containing instructions on how to reset your password has been sent to the email address listed on your account.
No promotional rates found.
Secure & Encrypted
Thank you.
Your gift purchase was successful! Your purchase was successful, and you are now logged in.
| Rate: | |
| Begins: | |
| Transaction ID: |
A receipt was sent to your email.
(0) comments
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.