Restoring faith in Supreme Court

The Constitution's Framers structured the Constitution to promote the separation of powers and protect the federal courts from undue influence by Congress and the executive branch. Among the federal courts, the Constitution grants the Supreme Court special status.

Rational Americans have faith in their Supreme Court because they live in a country controlled by law, not by the whims of an emotional court of public opinion. And that is also the reason no one is punished for implications nor accusations.

There are clearly arguments for both sides of this issue.

Can the present system work for both sides? Congress has the authority to pass legislation that may amend a SCOTUS ruling. Congress is also the only entity that can impeach and remove jurists for bribery, high crimes and misdemeanors.

With the Court packed with Catholics, there is already more than enough "faith", - which of course is a good part of the problem! Why aren't non-believers better represented? That's a group larger than any religious category, even in our somewhat backwards country!

"Lack of ethics from Congress is wilfully ignored!" cry the people who support George Santos.

If everyone who wanted to move to Kentucky moved to Kentucky, California would be better off.

You want to change the entire American system thats been operating more or less on a net positive up until 2+ years ago because of your selective outrage. Your entire premise is that you are angry with the historic operational method of the American Supreme Court (noting J6 + abortion as primary concerns hits that you are emotionally compromised) and you think there should be more micromanaging by people not educated on the same level as the justices themselves. You dont assign an engineer to fly the plane. You dont apply the same set of constraints to a mayor as you do the president. The facts that the Supreme Court are life appointments with no oversight from the other branches are fundamental to the function of our country and the continuity of our legal history. Ya know....checks and balances....we learned this in 5th grade. But common core has made our kids and their so-called custodians into proverbial slugs. Your outrage should not be taken seriously because you only want to hold one "side" accountable. Wrong is wrong and right is right no matter what light you see it in. When the only tool you have is a blue hammer everything looks like a red nail. Where is this energy for Nancy Pelosi -Diane Feinstein- Chucky Schumer - Hillary/Bill? All i ask is people be fair and impartial when dealing with immorality and ethics. Lady Justice is blind - not emotional and pedantic. The fact that one of these justices cant or refuses to define what a woman is should be the most troubling thing to any sane person. But it seems today like sanity is thrown to the wayside in favor of giving people safe spaces to coddle their predatory ideas that are disguised as altruistic. "Democracy" has become a proxy word for control and "political correctness." Bunch of indoctrinated Bolsheviks and they dont even know it. The perfect drones. I should have been smarter and moved to Kentucky with my brother.