Editor,
Ms. Cornell in her Nov. 21 guest perspective “Repeal of Costa-Hawkins essential to our communities” is another in a long line of pro rent control writers whose solution to the problem does not involve their own wallet.
Editor,
Ms. Cornell in her Nov. 21 guest perspective “Repeal of Costa-Hawkins essential to our communities” is another in a long line of pro rent control writers whose solution to the problem does not involve their own wallet.
To summarize her three columns, she believes that there are people in our community who on their own could not afford the current rental market but should be subsidized so that they can remain here. She believes that the landlord should bear the entire cost of this subsidy. Ms Cornell, if you believe that it is society’s responsibility to maintain these individuals in this very expensive area then the economic subsidy should be borne by all of us through our taxes. When individuals cannot afford the cost of food we don’t try to pass a law requiring Safeway to lower their prices to a more affordable level. What we do is reach into our tax coffers to provide food stamps for these individuals.
Steven Howard
Redwood City
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.
Already a subscriber? Login Here
Sorry, an error occurred.
Already Subscribed!
Cancel anytime
Thank you .
Your account has been registered, and you are now logged in.
Check your email for details.
Submitting this form below will send a message to your email with a link to change your password.
An email message containing instructions on how to reset your password has been sent to the email address listed on your account.
No promotional rates found.
Secure & Encrypted
Thank you.
Your gift purchase was successful! Your purchase was successful, and you are now logged in.
| Rate: | |
| Begins: | |
| Transaction ID: |
A receipt was sent to your email.
(5) comments
Not a bad plan Steve. Have society bear the cost of shelter for all. Hmmm. Especially subsidized housing units for the workforce, the elderly, those trying to raise families, the sick and and the disabled. Not a bad plan at all.
We already have a taxpayer funded subsidized housing for low income earners. It's called Section 8. Now if you want new revenues to build free housing for all (including those who demand housing for free) then let's raise additional taxes for everybody so we have money to pay for this "shelter for all" program that's paid for by the society.
Steve: Thank you for the very cogent arguments. Hopefully, this is not falling on deaf ears.
So let me get this straight. Instead of recognizing that renters are human beings with rights, it would be better if government further redistributed money into the pockets of landlords? How very interesting.
Well Justin, where does anyone say that renters aren't human beings with rights? There you are playing a victim card. Why not blame Russia as well? The whole notion of rent control is an ongoing movement to expand principles that undermine capitalism. Indeed activists are looking to slowly and continually chip away at our capitalistic society as a method to bring more Progressive control in governing. The rent control initiative is just a tool, a means to further the agenda by infiltrating local government.
Hey, --let's all just throw up our hands and acquiesce that because someone doesn't have the means to stay in the area without being subsidized we should all just roll over because our hard work to buy something now means nothing with the likes of your thinking. . When the government (surely it won't be a proposed unelected housing commission with no accountability) puts into the IRS code, as law, that an owner can fully deduct the delta between market rate apartments and the subsidized discount mandated by property control along with the tenant having to declare that subsidized amount as income, well lets see how that goes. Of course we are talking about income redistribution via a subsidy. Is this your proposal Justin?
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.