Editor,
Thank you for the Daily Journal’s excellent editorial highlighting the serious shortcomings in San Mateo’s proposed historic preservation ordinance. Your piece rightly called attention to what many residents have been concerned about.
Editor,
Thank you for the Daily Journal’s excellent editorial highlighting the serious shortcomings in San Mateo’s proposed historic preservation ordinance. Your piece rightly called attention to what many residents have been concerned about.
The City Council will vote on the revised ordinance May 4. Although staff describe it as an update, the revisions weaken long-standing protections for our city’s many historic buildings. Strong safeguards — such as design review and limits on demolition — would now apply only to the downtown historic district and three already-designated properties. The roughly 200 historic resources identified in the city’s own 1989 Historic Building Survey would receive less protection than they have had for decades.
This approach also conflicts with our recently adopted 2040 General Plan, which calls for actively preserving San Mateo’s historic resources and specifically recognizes the resources identified in the 1989 survey.
Compounding the problem are new state laws Assembly Bill 130 and Senate Bill 79. The laws make it much easier to build denser and taller housing near Caltrain, including inside the downtown historic district.
The draft prioritizes owner consent and development flexibility over preservation. Council should direct staff to incorporate the 1989 survey into the official inventory, extend review to all eligible resources, relax consent barriers for basic protections, and complete proper CEQA review.
San Mateo’s history is one of our greatest assets. Please contact your councilmembers and ask them to preserve — not reduce — San Mateo’s historic heritage.
Laurie Hietter
San Mateo
The letter writer wrote this on behalf of the San Mateo Heritage Alliance.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.
Already a subscriber? Login Here
Sorry, an error occurred.
Already Subscribed!
Cancel anytime
Thank you .
Your account has been registered, and you are now logged in.
Check your email for details.
Submitting this form below will send a message to your email with a link to change your password.
An email message containing instructions on how to reset your password has been sent to the email address listed on your account.
No promotional rates found.
Secure & Encrypted
Thank you.
Your gift purchase was successful! Your purchase was successful, and you are now logged in.
| Rate: | |
| Begins: | |
| Transaction ID: |
A receipt was sent to your email.
(1) comment
Wait, Ms. Hietter, owner consent and development flexibility is prioritized over preservation? Owners having control over their own property? And being able to opt out of more red tape and higher costs? What a common sense idea. If historic-oriented folks want to preserve certain properties, they can purchase the property and do what they want, preservation or not. I’d recommend folks contact their councilmembers and ask them to preserve the right of owner consent and development flexibility. It’s only fair.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.