In his Aug. 5 letter “Definition of a Socialist,” Chuck Simmons erred when identifying me as a “conservative.” Sorry Chuck, I always have been and will continue to be a moderate Democrat. So Chuck, no matter how you put your spin on defining Socialists, to paraphrase an old saying, “A Socialist by any other name is still a Socialist,” and I do not intend to support or vote for any one who labels him/herself a Socialist.
Ray: That socialism or communism or any other kind of authoritarianism doesn't work in a democratic way, has been proven over and over again, while socialized capitalism as practiced in the Scandinavian countries, seem to work quite well for everybody.
Agreed... authoritarianism and democratic governments are polar opposites.
With regard to your reference to "socialized capitalism," I don't think you can smush those terms together. If you claim to have a capitalistic economic system but it is not driven by a free market, then it ain't capitalism, governor! Let's have some of our resident economists weigh in on this topic...
Are you sure you want to model the US after Scandinavian countries? Their tax-to-GDP ratios are much higher than ours. How did the Scandinavian countries get there? They have higher income tax rates, higher social security contributions (payroll taxes), and higher value-added taxes (sales taxes).
In the US, socialist democrats... not socialist capitalists... appear to want to steer us in the direction of a higher tax-to-GDP ratio. The "Inflation Reduction Act" with its tax increases is a step in that direction. If the trend toward a Scandinavian type tax-to-GDP ratio continues, it's possible that corporate taxes would decrease.
Ray: The Scandinavian countries have been classified as relatively free capitalistic enterprise nations by greater economists than me, however, somewhat “socialized” to take better care of the needy and the elderly, resulting in lower poverty, lower crime, and overall more satisfied people all together. Still, some people become filthy rich, with no higher income tax rates than here. Among my numerous friends “over there”, I never hear anyone complaining about taxes! The “65% tax rate” than one on this site keeps referring to, is pure nonsense!
I was hoping our colleagues better versed in economics would have chimed in by now... I still think you cannot smush the words socialism and capitalism together quite so easily. Scandinavian countries provide a wide range of social programs and they operate largely as free market economies... however, that doesn't mean they have "socialized capitalistic" systems.
Re: our Scandinavian friends, you wrote, "... some people become filthy rich, with no higher income tax rates than here." Becoming filthy rich in Scandinavia is an accomplishment because of the overall income tax rates are higher. My hat is off to them.
Then, "Among my numerous friends 'over there,' I never hear anyone complaining about taxes!" Skrrrrip! Jorg... I feel if you widen your circle of friends, you will hear plenty of complaints about taxes. The average value-added/sales tax in the US is about 5%. You will find value-added/sales taxes "over there" around 25%. That particular tax is a regressive tax with a huge impact on lower income folks. I'm guessing those folks have some complaints about taxes.
Ah... back to the "65% tax rate” issue. I have watched you and Ed Kahl go back and forth on this topic. I know you keep saying one cannot simply add up all the taxes levied in Scandinavia and come up with a 65% tax rate. From your perspective, such a calculation is "pure nonsense!"
OK. But when you look at Scandinavian taxes and see income taxes as high as 55%, sales taxes as high as 25%, and payroll taxes as high as another 10%... if the overall Scandinavian tax rate is not 65%... then what is it? And... how would the overall tax rate in Scandinavia compare to the tax rate in the US?
Ray: No so-called free enterprise capitalistic system is totally unregulated. They all are, more or less, and have to be in an organized society. In the Scandinavian countries somewhat more regulated than most, to protect people, resources, and the environment, which people “over there” are quite satisfied with, to protect the society they all are a part of. That’s where the word “socialized” comes in. Anything wrong with that?
As I said earlier, you will find a lot of social programs in Scandinavia... and if the folks "over there" like what those programs offer... good for them. I feel we can agree that the establishment of social programs in Scandinavia does not mean Scandinavians have embraced socialism.
I have heard it described this way... You cannot attach the label of socialism to Scandinavia but they sure soak Scandinavian taxpayers.
Which brings us back to the very high taxes in Scandinavia... I'm sorry but I find it difficult to accept that Scandinavians are happy with their high taxes and that no one "over there" complains about the high tax-to-GDP ratios.
Which brings us back to the "65% tax rate” issue, and the question that has not been answered...
When you look at Scandinavian taxes and see income taxes as high as 55%, sales taxes as high as 25%, and payroll taxes as high as another 10%... if the overall Scandinavian tax rate is not 65%... then what is it? And... how would the overall tax rate in Scandinavia compare to the tax rate in the US?
Ray: OK, I’ll give it another try. First of all, there is no applicable “overall tax rate”. Income taxes are progressive, meaning that they increase by income level, but the higher tax rate only applies to income over a certain level, not to the total income. Higher tax rates only affect the very high incomes, but even high income earners do not pay a higher total rate than here. Taxes are public, so every year the highest income earners are listed in the local papers, where you rarely see anyone with higher total income tax than some 40%. After various deductibles, like here, the national tax rate is 22% up to $200k and 38.2% >$1 million
Exchange tax, or VAT, is higher than here, but cannot be added to income tax rate for obvious reasons. This added sales tax becomes a part of the cost of items purchased, like here, but doesn’t apply to food and most necessities, and of course depends upon individual purchasing pattern. No one spends all the income for VAT-affected items!
Then, of course, we have free universal health care and free school tuition, while certain higher studies, like medicine, dentistry, pharmaceutical, and engineering, are what we call “closed”, meaning that you have to compete on your gymnasium grades to be accepted, - no matter how much parents make! How math challenged does someone have to be to add income tax and VAT to come up with 65%?
Hello, Jorg… sorry I didn’t get back to you earlier but I’ve been out taking care of errands.
Ed Kahl must be chuckling while sipping his afternoon coffee...
Jorg, I get it. You reject the term “overall tax rate” apparently because analysts comparing tax rates for different countries don’t use that exact term. However, comparisons using tax-to-GDP ratios for different countries can give us an idea about overall tax rates as those comparisons include income, VAT (sales), social security (payroll), and property taxes. The tax-to-GDP ratios are significantly higher in Scandinavian countries when compared to the US.
You wrote, “Higher tax rates only affect the very high incomes, but even high income earners do not pay a higher total rate than here.” I disagree. Here’s why… average salary in Sweden is about $60,000 (USD), and the average salary here is about $54,000 (USD). Sweden’s top personal income tax rate of 53% is applied to earners making more than 1.5 times the average salary in Sweden. That means if you make more than $90,000 in Sweden, you are taxed at the highest rate. In the US, persons making 9 times the average will be charged the top personal income tax rate of 37%. So, when an American’s earnings top $486,000, he or she will be assessed the top income tax rate. Thus, higher tax rates affect a lot of (upper) middle-class Scandinavian folks as well as high income earners.
As for the claim that high income earning Scandinavians pay a lower rate in taxes compared to US citizens… look at the example above… 53% > 37%. The higher rates are in Scandinavia. Yes, I agree there are quite a number of variables when you try to compare the whole of Scandinavia to the US, but overall… there’s that word again… Scandinavians pay a lot more in taxes.
Ray: While my numbers mainly refer to Norway, I don’t think your comment helped the understanding of the difference between average tax rate and the bracket rates. There is no income tax up to a certain income level. Between that level and the next higher bracket, a certain tax rate applies, usually about 22%, but only for the part of the income between those two brackets. Between that income level and the next bracket, a slightly higher tax rate applies, but only for the part of the income between those two brackets. For the highest bracket, the highest tax rate applies, but only for the part of the income over that bracket, not for the income below that level. Hope that helps.
But why this strange obsession with the small Scandinavian countries? That’s hard to understand.
As I said, there are a lot of variables to consider when comparing tax rates, but when you compare taxes paid by everyday Scandinavians to taxes paid by everyday Americans... Scandinavians pay significantly more. How else could those countries provide all the "free" stuff you mentioned earlier today?
You asked about the strange obsession with smaller Scandinavian countries... ahem... you introduced Scandinavia into the conversation when you wrote yesterday morning, "... socialized capitalism as practiced in the Scandinavian countries, seem [sic] to work quite well for everybody."
BTW... I won't tell any Swedes you think they come from a small Scandinavian country.
Jorg - I believe you are referring to the tax systems in the Scandinavian countries. In The Netherlands, the VAT applies to all purchases including food and medication. VAT there is a one-time deal. For instance, the purchase of a car is taxed once, never again with a resale. Now, final exam grades determine university and technical enrollment eligibility but the tuition is not free. All students, just like here, are now grumbling because of student loans. Admittedly, the tuition is not as outrageously high as in the US. I have mentioned this before, the Dutch are paying high taxes but they are getting a lot back for it. Their roads are spotless, there is no filth, almost zero crime and homelessness is dealt with before it becomes a problem. Overregulation is a big problem there but the Dutch appear to tolerate it.
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(14) comments
"The strongest argument for socialism is that it sounds good. The strongest argument against socialism is that it doesn't work." - Thomas Sowell
Ray: That socialism or communism or any other kind of authoritarianism doesn't work in a democratic way, has been proven over and over again, while socialized capitalism as practiced in the Scandinavian countries, seem to work quite well for everybody.
Hello, Jorg
Agreed... authoritarianism and democratic governments are polar opposites.
With regard to your reference to "socialized capitalism," I don't think you can smush those terms together. If you claim to have a capitalistic economic system but it is not driven by a free market, then it ain't capitalism, governor! Let's have some of our resident economists weigh in on this topic...
Are you sure you want to model the US after Scandinavian countries? Their tax-to-GDP ratios are much higher than ours. How did the Scandinavian countries get there? They have higher income tax rates, higher social security contributions (payroll taxes), and higher value-added taxes (sales taxes).
In the US, socialist democrats... not socialist capitalists... appear to want to steer us in the direction of a higher tax-to-GDP ratio. The "Inflation Reduction Act" with its tax increases is a step in that direction. If the trend toward a Scandinavian type tax-to-GDP ratio continues, it's possible that corporate taxes would decrease.
Skål, y'all!
Ray: The Scandinavian countries have been classified as relatively free capitalistic enterprise nations by greater economists than me, however, somewhat “socialized” to take better care of the needy and the elderly, resulting in lower poverty, lower crime, and overall more satisfied people all together. Still, some people become filthy rich, with no higher income tax rates than here. Among my numerous friends “over there”, I never hear anyone complaining about taxes! The “65% tax rate” than one on this site keeps referring to, is pure nonsense!
Hello again, Jorg
I was hoping our colleagues better versed in economics would have chimed in by now... I still think you cannot smush the words socialism and capitalism together quite so easily. Scandinavian countries provide a wide range of social programs and they operate largely as free market economies... however, that doesn't mean they have "socialized capitalistic" systems.
Re: our Scandinavian friends, you wrote, "... some people become filthy rich, with no higher income tax rates than here." Becoming filthy rich in Scandinavia is an accomplishment because of the overall income tax rates are higher. My hat is off to them.
Then, "Among my numerous friends 'over there,' I never hear anyone complaining about taxes!" Skrrrrip! Jorg... I feel if you widen your circle of friends, you will hear plenty of complaints about taxes. The average value-added/sales tax in the US is about 5%. You will find value-added/sales taxes "over there" around 25%. That particular tax is a regressive tax with a huge impact on lower income folks. I'm guessing those folks have some complaints about taxes.
Ah... back to the "65% tax rate” issue. I have watched you and Ed Kahl go back and forth on this topic. I know you keep saying one cannot simply add up all the taxes levied in Scandinavia and come up with a 65% tax rate. From your perspective, such a calculation is "pure nonsense!"
OK. But when you look at Scandinavian taxes and see income taxes as high as 55%, sales taxes as high as 25%, and payroll taxes as high as another 10%... if the overall Scandinavian tax rate is not 65%... then what is it? And... how would the overall tax rate in Scandinavia compare to the tax rate in the US?
Ray: No so-called free enterprise capitalistic system is totally unregulated. They all are, more or less, and have to be in an organized society. In the Scandinavian countries somewhat more regulated than most, to protect people, resources, and the environment, which people “over there” are quite satisfied with, to protect the society they all are a part of. That’s where the word “socialized” comes in. Anything wrong with that?
Good morning, Jorg
As I said earlier, you will find a lot of social programs in Scandinavia... and if the folks "over there" like what those programs offer... good for them. I feel we can agree that the establishment of social programs in Scandinavia does not mean Scandinavians have embraced socialism.
I have heard it described this way... You cannot attach the label of socialism to Scandinavia but they sure soak Scandinavian taxpayers.
Which brings us back to the very high taxes in Scandinavia... I'm sorry but I find it difficult to accept that Scandinavians are happy with their high taxes and that no one "over there" complains about the high tax-to-GDP ratios.
Which brings us back to the "65% tax rate” issue, and the question that has not been answered...
When you look at Scandinavian taxes and see income taxes as high as 55%, sales taxes as high as 25%, and payroll taxes as high as another 10%... if the overall Scandinavian tax rate is not 65%... then what is it? And... how would the overall tax rate in Scandinavia compare to the tax rate in the US?
Ray: OK, I’ll give it another try. First of all, there is no applicable “overall tax rate”. Income taxes are progressive, meaning that they increase by income level, but the higher tax rate only applies to income over a certain level, not to the total income. Higher tax rates only affect the very high incomes, but even high income earners do not pay a higher total rate than here. Taxes are public, so every year the highest income earners are listed in the local papers, where you rarely see anyone with higher total income tax than some 40%. After various deductibles, like here, the national tax rate is 22% up to $200k and 38.2% >$1 million
Exchange tax, or VAT, is higher than here, but cannot be added to income tax rate for obvious reasons. This added sales tax becomes a part of the cost of items purchased, like here, but doesn’t apply to food and most necessities, and of course depends upon individual purchasing pattern. No one spends all the income for VAT-affected items!
Then, of course, we have free universal health care and free school tuition, while certain higher studies, like medicine, dentistry, pharmaceutical, and engineering, are what we call “closed”, meaning that you have to compete on your gymnasium grades to be accepted, - no matter how much parents make! How math challenged does someone have to be to add income tax and VAT to come up with 65%?
Hello, Jorg… sorry I didn’t get back to you earlier but I’ve been out taking care of errands.
Ed Kahl must be chuckling while sipping his afternoon coffee...
Jorg, I get it. You reject the term “overall tax rate” apparently because analysts comparing tax rates for different countries don’t use that exact term. However, comparisons using tax-to-GDP ratios for different countries can give us an idea about overall tax rates as those comparisons include income, VAT (sales), social security (payroll), and property taxes. The tax-to-GDP ratios are significantly higher in Scandinavian countries when compared to the US.
You wrote, “Higher tax rates only affect the very high incomes, but even high income earners do not pay a higher total rate than here.” I disagree. Here’s why… average salary in Sweden is about $60,000 (USD), and the average salary here is about $54,000 (USD). Sweden’s top personal income tax rate of 53% is applied to earners making more than 1.5 times the average salary in Sweden. That means if you make more than $90,000 in Sweden, you are taxed at the highest rate. In the US, persons making 9 times the average will be charged the top personal income tax rate of 37%. So, when an American’s earnings top $486,000, he or she will be assessed the top income tax rate. Thus, higher tax rates affect a lot of (upper) middle-class Scandinavian folks as well as high income earners.
As for the claim that high income earning Scandinavians pay a lower rate in taxes compared to US citizens… look at the example above… 53% > 37%. The higher rates are in Scandinavia. Yes, I agree there are quite a number of variables when you try to compare the whole of Scandinavia to the US, but overall… there’s that word again… Scandinavians pay a lot more in taxes.
Ray: While my numbers mainly refer to Norway, I don’t think your comment helped the understanding of the difference between average tax rate and the bracket rates. There is no income tax up to a certain income level. Between that level and the next higher bracket, a certain tax rate applies, usually about 22%, but only for the part of the income between those two brackets. Between that income level and the next bracket, a slightly higher tax rate applies, but only for the part of the income between those two brackets. For the highest bracket, the highest tax rate applies, but only for the part of the income over that bracket, not for the income below that level. Hope that helps.
But why this strange obsession with the small Scandinavian countries? That’s hard to understand.
Jorg...
As I said, there are a lot of variables to consider when comparing tax rates, but when you compare taxes paid by everyday Scandinavians to taxes paid by everyday Americans... Scandinavians pay significantly more. How else could those countries provide all the "free" stuff you mentioned earlier today?
You asked about the strange obsession with smaller Scandinavian countries... ahem... you introduced Scandinavia into the conversation when you wrote yesterday morning, "... socialized capitalism as practiced in the Scandinavian countries, seem [sic] to work quite well for everybody."
BTW... I won't tell any Swedes you think they come from a small Scandinavian country.
Jorg - I believe you are referring to the tax systems in the Scandinavian countries. In The Netherlands, the VAT applies to all purchases including food and medication. VAT there is a one-time deal. For instance, the purchase of a car is taxed once, never again with a resale. Now, final exam grades determine university and technical enrollment eligibility but the tuition is not free. All students, just like here, are now grumbling because of student loans. Admittedly, the tuition is not as outrageously high as in the US. I have mentioned this before, the Dutch are paying high taxes but they are getting a lot back for it. Their roads are spotless, there is no filth, almost zero crime and homelessness is dealt with before it becomes a problem. Overregulation is a big problem there but the Dutch appear to tolerate it.
Yes, Dirk, mainly Norway, and thanks for interesting update on The Netherlands, setting a good example in many ways.
Thanks for the info, Dirk.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.