In a time when communities across the Bay Area are grappling with housing shortages, infrastructure demands, climate resilience and workforce instability, it’s more important than ever to ensure that public and private development delivers lasting value — not just in concrete and steel, but in opportunities for working people and protections for taxpayers.

Project Labor Agreements offer precisely that.

Recommended for you

Recommended for you

(2) comments

Dirk van Ulden

I am not sure who or what the "Building Trades Council" represents but if they are a compilation of business owners, that Council is shooting itself in the foot. Apprentice programs are valuable but should be offered without labor union interference and should be incorporated in our education system following the European models. There is no reason for the labor unions to dictate who should be able to enroll if only to make sure that journeymen become card carrying and due paying members. Labor unions practice exclusion and regulate work rules that drive up labor costs. Prevailing wages are an insult to skilled workmen or women and also unnecessarily add to construction costs as they exclude non-union skilled workers. Just watch a typical PG&E crew, mandatory members of the IBEW, where a number of them have a specific task and are prohibited from overstepping that work rule. If they do, a grievance is filed, further strangling progress. Productivity obstacles and targeted inefficiencies are the mantra of most labor unions.

Terence Y

Wait, we have an executive officer of the San Mateo Labor Council and a business manager of the San Mateo Building Trades Council writing a guest perspective to justify higher costs for union labor? What a surprise. Not really. What Ms. Lind and Mr. Pantoja don’t tell you is that PLAs associated with unions increase the costs of building by 10% or more, on average. The following link (https://www.abcofca.org/Education-Resources/Project-Labor-Agreement-Education) provides more information on what folks need to know. In short, PLAs stifle competition, increase costs, are unfair and discriminatory, exacerbate skilled labor shortages, and harm local communities. Seems to me those shortcomings are much more important than paying union labor more money for the same work. I’d recommend searching for “get the truth about PLAs” to round out your education. Meanwhile, how much are PLAs mandating union labor preventing housing and infrastructure from being built affordably? If I’m not mistaken, I believe the Trump administration is looking to roll back PLAs mandating union labor. A good start and one which would save taxpayer money.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.

Thank you for visiting the Daily Journal.

Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading. To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.

We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.

A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!

Want to join the discussion?

Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.

Already a subscriber? Login Here