From destructive wildfires to devastating droughts, the consequences of climate change are being felt today by every community in California. At California Water Service, or Cal Water, we experience this firsthand since we serve nearly 2 million customers in urban, rural and agricultural areas across northern, central and southern California. The actions we collectively take today will determine the impact that climate change has on California’s communities tomorrow. We — as companies, communities and individuals — must act now to address the risks of climate change to ensure Californians have enough water for their everyday and emergency needs, both now and in the future.
What does a comprehensive strategy look like?
First, we need a holistic understanding of the vulnerabilities of our state’s infrastructure and watersheds to climate-related changes. Research shows that climate change is driving reductions to snowpack, greater concentrations of precipitation through atmospheric river events, and more volatility between wet and dry water years — all of which affect our water supply. We must plan and prepare for every kind of climate hazard in the coming years, including extreme heat, increased rain and flooding, and more intense periods of drought.
At Cal Water, we are modeling climate scenarios to understand and prepare for the impact of climate change on future water demand and supplies over the near, mid and long term. This modeling gives us visibility into the potential magnitude and frequency of the expected climate threats. For example, with the threat of drought, we have long-term plans in place to help identify existing and future supplies as well as to address any gaps between supply and demand.
Second, armed with this knowledge, we must develop adaptation plans. For a water utility, this means stress-testing our water system under a variety of scenarios to ensure facilities and operations are resilient and to determine as precisely as possible the impact a climate threat will have on our water supplies. Using the example of a drought, this could mean altering operations, further diversifying water supply sources, increasing the use of recycled water or upgrading our infrastructure to minimize water loss.
Recommended for you
Managing the impact of climate change on our communities is necessary but not sufficient on its own. We must also manage our communities’ impact on climate change by curbing the greenhouse gas emissions that cause it in the first place. An often overlooked way to achieve this goal is by decreasing water use.
There is an inextricable link between water and energy. It takes energy to deliver water to your tap, and that energy generates carbon emissions. The Environmental Protection Agency estimates that 3% to 4% of national electricity consumption is used to provide drinking water and wastewater services each year. By accelerating water conservation efforts and reducing water use, we save energy. And by using less energy, we decrease harmful carbon emissions.
The good news? It has never been easier to save water at home. There are several ways we can make simple changes to our daily routines that, collectively, add up to a big difference. At Cal Water, for example, we offer a free conservation kit to customers that includes high-efficiency showerheads, shut-off hose nozzles, faucet aerators and leak detection dye tablets. Customers can also take advantage of our rebates and programs to save money on high-efficiency washing machines, toilets and sprinkler nozzles.
By working together, we can mitigate the risks of climate change, protect the reliability and resilience of essential water resources, and achieve greater levels of water efficiency that positions California, no matter what threats lie ahead, for a more secure water future. 
Ken Jenkins is the director of Water Resource Sustainability of California Water Service.
Actually, Mr. Jenkins, maybe you can answer a few questions? Since about 50% of our water is for environmental purposes, why are we releasing water from reservoirs to flow out to sea in order to save a few fish that haven’t been found in a while? Isn’t this folly, since we’re just wasting water? Why aren’t we building more dams to save water for lean times? Since only about 10% of water is used for homes and businesses, how much of a dent would people really make in saving water? 1 or 2%? So more water can be wasted in trying to save non-existent fish?
Besides, with this supposed global warming, won't we get more water from those melting glaciers and the resulting sea level rise? All you need to do is get the salt out so it might be prudent to start investing in desalination plants. You could pay for these plants from the rising prices you’ll charge us for using less water. Maybe your pleas should be directed at our imperious and short sighted governor to start building a few more dams and stop letting our valuable water flow out to sea for no appreciable benefit.
There is no scientific proof that climate change is responsible for our drought since similar droughts occurred before the fossil fuel era. Your article offers no realistic way to meaningfully increase our water storage for drought year.s CA voted for Prop 1 in 2019 to build more water storage but no meaningful water storage like the Site's Reservoir and increasing the height of the Shasta Reservoir have been undertaken. Prior to our current drought, the Shasta Reservoir released water in the spring of 2019 for tens of millions of homes due to lack of capacity. Also the increase in ground water storage, recycling and conservation can only supply a tiny percent of our needs. Increasing our water storage should be CA's number 1 priority. The only thing stopping this are Democrats in Sacramento. Meanwhile CAL Waters uses the drought to increase water rates for home owners.
Ed and Terrence are both correct. Don't we all get tired of the " we are in this together" and our most favorite" the new normal"? The State and the water agencies need to admit that they fail to supply and manage our water and suddenly ask us to bail them out? As Terrence said, for a miniscule reduction that water users can deliver?. Get serious, Mr. Jenkins and go to work at a solution or hire someone who can do the job.
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(3) comments
Actually, Mr. Jenkins, maybe you can answer a few questions? Since about 50% of our water is for environmental purposes, why are we releasing water from reservoirs to flow out to sea in order to save a few fish that haven’t been found in a while? Isn’t this folly, since we’re just wasting water? Why aren’t we building more dams to save water for lean times? Since only about 10% of water is used for homes and businesses, how much of a dent would people really make in saving water? 1 or 2%? So more water can be wasted in trying to save non-existent fish?
Besides, with this supposed global warming, won't we get more water from those melting glaciers and the resulting sea level rise? All you need to do is get the salt out so it might be prudent to start investing in desalination plants. You could pay for these plants from the rising prices you’ll charge us for using less water. Maybe your pleas should be directed at our imperious and short sighted governor to start building a few more dams and stop letting our valuable water flow out to sea for no appreciable benefit.
There is no scientific proof that climate change is responsible for our drought since similar droughts occurred before the fossil fuel era. Your article offers no realistic way to meaningfully increase our water storage for drought year.s CA voted for Prop 1 in 2019 to build more water storage but no meaningful water storage like the Site's Reservoir and increasing the height of the Shasta Reservoir have been undertaken. Prior to our current drought, the Shasta Reservoir released water in the spring of 2019 for tens of millions of homes due to lack of capacity. Also the increase in ground water storage, recycling and conservation can only supply a tiny percent of our needs. Increasing our water storage should be CA's number 1 priority. The only thing stopping this are Democrats in Sacramento. Meanwhile CAL Waters uses the drought to increase water rates for home owners.
Ed and Terrence are both correct. Don't we all get tired of the " we are in this together" and our most favorite" the new normal"? The State and the water agencies need to admit that they fail to supply and manage our water and suddenly ask us to bail them out? As Terrence said, for a miniscule reduction that water users can deliver?. Get serious, Mr. Jenkins and go to work at a solution or hire someone who can do the job.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.