Mark Simon

For many reasons — expected massive voter turnout, a lengthy ballot requiring many voters to seek input on down-ballot races and an energized electorate — this could be an election in which the endorsements by the San Mateo County Democratic Party could be important and impactful.

You might conclude that the candidates endorsed by the party would be, you know, Democrats.

Recommended for you

Recommended for you

(1) comment

Michael B. Reiner, PhD

The validity of a contract signed by Mr. Whitlock in an agreement with the District which, in essence, gives away his constitutional rights may be in question. While such settlement agreements are standard in private industry to protect the corporation's "brand," the U.S. 4th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled against government's ability to silence dissent even if a contract was signed in a settlement (and disallowed the government's ability to withhold "payment in full" as pressure on the plaintiff to conform) . See:

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-2444ASHLEY AMARIS OVERBEY; BALTIMORE BREW, Plaintiffs – Appellants,v.THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE; BALTIMORE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, Defendants – Appellees.

It has been argued that such agreements by the government raise serious political accountability questions. In matters of public concern, if the electorate learns that government agencies are requiring parties to sign non-disparagement agreements for payments of cash, the people may begin to speculate that the government is trying to hide something. This, thereby, may be more damaging to government integrity, transparency, and confidence than the facts themselves.

We see suppression of truth happening in Washington daily. Why deny someone the right to run for elected office and let the voters decide his fate? Should that be left to the San Mateo County Community College District Board of Trustees? Who made them prosecutor, chief judge, and jury?

This is not a "lawyering" sleight of hand (I am not an attorney - I am speaking as a citizen). We are talking about powerful government agencies (the SMCCCD budget is about $200M + billions in construction bonds) using taxpayer dollars as "hush money" in a quid pro quo.  

What are they trying to keep from the light of day?

-- 

Michael B. Reiner, PhD, is a higher education consultant and educational researcher. Previously, he was a professor of psychology and college administrator at City University of New York (CUNY), Miami Dade College, the Riverside Community College District, and the San Mateo County Community College 

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.

Thank you for visiting the Daily Journal.

Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading. To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.

We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.

A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!

Want to join the discussion?

Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.

Already a subscriber? Login Here