For many reasons — expected massive voter turnout, a lengthy ballot requiring many voters to seek input on down-ballot races and an energized electorate — this could be an election in which the endorsements by the San Mateo County Democratic Party could be important and impactful.
You might conclude that the candidates endorsed by the party would be, you know, Democrats.
In fairness, every candidate endorsed by the party is a Democrat. It’s just that a couple — Virginia Chang Kiraly and John Pimentel — are recent converts.
Chang Kiraly, running for re-election to the San Mateo County Harbor Commission, was a registered Republican until a year ago, when she switched to Democrat. Her involvement in local politics has been high profile and, one might say, multi-faceted — she also is seeking re-election to the Menlo Fire Protection District Board of Directors. But she was not particularly partisan as a Republican, the GOP being in such a moribund state that activism there is of limited scope.
Pimentel, running for the San Mateo County Community College District Board of Trustees against Lisa Hicks-Dumanske, has a much more fascinating history. By his own account, he voted Democratic in the last three presidential races and the last three California gubernatorial races. During those elections, he said he was registered No Party Preference. Thousands of California NPPs typically vote Democratic.
The extra spin on the ball for Pimentel is what he was doing a year ago. He says he registered as a Democrat in 2018. But in 2019, he was turning up in news reports as founder of the would-be Common Sense Party, which now is being spearheaded by former Peninsula congressman Tom Campbell and former Bay Area state senator Quentin Kopp.
All this was well known to the Democratic Central Committee members when they voted on their endorsements at an online meeting last week. Pimentel got well over the required 60% threshold. Oddly, between a handful of no votes and abstentions, more people didn’t vote for him than did.
Perhaps the prevailing sentiment was best expressed by Vice Chair Cliff Robbins: “I welcome any former Republican into the (Democratic) fold.”
PROMISES, PROMISES: Races for the community college and the harbor districts historically have not attracted much attention. Not this year and not last week at the endorsement meeting.
Recommended for you
In the community college district race between Eugene Whitlock and Lisa Petrides, there was evident uneasiness at the central committee about Whitlock, a former vice chancellor of the district. The same week as the endorsement vote, news broke of his nearly $2.3 million settlement with the district. Union representatives were particularly harsh in their criticism of Whitlock, who was said to have been “openly hostile” to union members at the college district. Whitlock backers asked for a vote of no-endorsement. That failed with a 43% yes vote. Then, a motion to endorse Petrides was passed with 86%.
While we’re on the subject, Whitlock offers a lawyerly argument for why he can run for the college district board, despite signing a settlement in which he agreed “to have no further contact of any kind, whether direct or indirect, with (San Mateo County Community College District), including taking any measures that would create any type of relationship with SMCCCD.” The settlement also bars him from accessing SMCCCD property and use of district facilities.
He can make all the arguments he wants, of course. But the bottom line is this: He signed the agreement. He gave his word. Now, it appears, he doesn’t think that constitutes a promise he ought to keep.
Meanwhile, the district withheld half of his settlement pending Whitlock’s adherence to the terms of the agreement. Whitlock might have a chance to make his lawyerly arguments in court.
ONE PARTICULAR HARBOR: Chang Kiraly is being challenged for re-election to the Harbor District Commission by Kirsten Keith, a former Menlo Park councilwoman and mayor. At the endorsement meeting, Keith’s husband, John Woodell, a central committee member, nominated his wife for the endorsement. The motion got a 52% vote, shy of the needed 60%. Chang Kiraly then was endorsed with 63% of the vote.
Woodell made a point of raising the correction I ran recently about Keith, so let me get back to the basic point I was trying to make and that got lost in all the hoo-ha. Keith’s use of her ballot designation as a conservation agency director strikes me as misleading.
While further researching this issue, I noticed that her bio on the Bay Area Water Service and Conservation Agency website said she had “retired” from the Menlo Park council in 2018. Well, no. She lost a re-election bid. Keith has corrected the bio, deleting the reference. That’s nice.
Mark Simon is a veteran journalist, whose career included 15 years as an executive at SamTrans and Caltrain. He can be reached at marksimon@smdailyjournal.com.
The validity of a contract signed by Mr. Whitlock in an agreement with the District which, in essence, gives away his constitutional rights may be in question. While such settlement agreements are standard in private industry to protect the corporation's "brand," the U.S. 4th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled against government's ability to silence dissent even if a contract was signed in a settlement (and disallowed the government's ability to withhold "payment in full" as pressure on the plaintiff to conform) . See:
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-2444ASHLEY AMARIS OVERBEY; BALTIMORE BREW, Plaintiffs – Appellants,v.THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE; BALTIMORE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, Defendants – Appellees.
It has been argued that such agreements by the government raise serious political accountability questions. In matters of public concern, if the electorate learns that government agencies are requiring parties to sign non-disparagement agreements for payments of cash, the people may begin to speculate that the government is trying to hide something. This, thereby, may be more damaging to government integrity, transparency, and confidence than the facts themselves.
We see suppression of truth happening in Washington daily. Why deny someone the right to run for elected office and let the voters decide his fate? Should that be left to the San Mateo County Community College District Board of Trustees? Who made them prosecutor, chief judge, and jury?
This is not a "lawyering" sleight of hand (I am not an attorney - I am speaking as a citizen). We are talking about powerful government agencies (the SMCCCD budget is about $200M + billions in construction bonds) using taxpayer dollars as "hush money" in a quid pro quo.
What are they trying to keep from the light of day?
--
Michael B. Reiner, PhD, is a higher education consultant and educational researcher. Previously, he was a professor of psychology and college administrator at City University of New York (CUNY), Miami Dade College, the Riverside Community College District, and the San Mateo County Community College
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(1) comment
The validity of a contract signed by Mr. Whitlock in an agreement with the District which, in essence, gives away his constitutional rights may be in question. While such settlement agreements are standard in private industry to protect the corporation's "brand," the U.S. 4th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled against government's ability to silence dissent even if a contract was signed in a settlement (and disallowed the government's ability to withhold "payment in full" as pressure on the plaintiff to conform) . See:
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 17-2444ASHLEY AMARIS OVERBEY; BALTIMORE BREW, Plaintiffs – Appellants,v.THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL OF BALTIMORE; BALTIMORE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT, Defendants – Appellees.
It has been argued that such agreements by the government raise serious political accountability questions. In matters of public concern, if the electorate learns that government agencies are requiring parties to sign non-disparagement agreements for payments of cash, the people may begin to speculate that the government is trying to hide something. This, thereby, may be more damaging to government integrity, transparency, and confidence than the facts themselves.
We see suppression of truth happening in Washington daily. Why deny someone the right to run for elected office and let the voters decide his fate? Should that be left to the San Mateo County Community College District Board of Trustees? Who made them prosecutor, chief judge, and jury?
This is not a "lawyering" sleight of hand (I am not an attorney - I am speaking as a citizen). We are talking about powerful government agencies (the SMCCCD budget is about $200M + billions in construction bonds) using taxpayer dollars as "hush money" in a quid pro quo.
What are they trying to keep from the light of day?
--
Michael B. Reiner, PhD, is a higher education consultant and educational researcher. Previously, he was a professor of psychology and college administrator at City University of New York (CUNY), Miami Dade College, the Riverside Community College District, and the San Mateo County Community College
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.