Matt Grocott

Do you have a coffee shop where you visit regularly and sit with a bunch of friends and discuss the headlines of the day? It’s what makes a local coffee shop a nice place to go. Everyone’s sitting around a table, drinking their coffee or tea, reading the Daily Journal and, every so often, someone will toss out a comment or two about an article that caught their attention and everyone chimes in with their 2 cents! The Plantation Coffee Shop in San Carlos is such a place. I have, for years, enjoyed the banter that can be enjoyed there in the morning. In that vein I write today’s column.

Here’s a story about the lieutenant governor of California, Eleni Kounalakis. She’s remodeling her office at the state Capitol. That’s not unusual but the way she is funding it is. A committee was formed called “the Committee to Support the Office of the Lt. Governor.” They raised $300,000 for the project. Most of the money came from labor unions. On the one hand, it could be said that this is a good thing. The lieutenant governor is saving taxpayers money. True, initially, but then one might ask what the unions want? I doubt they are doing this out of the goodness of their collective hearts. My bet is a short-term gain will lead to a long-term loss.

Recommended for you

Recommended for you

(10) comments

JME

As a San Carlos council member Mr. Grocott authorized nearly three- quarters of a million dollars to remodel his council chambers at the San Carlos City Hall. Did this chamber really need this expensive upgrade? (Also at the taxpayers expense.)

Hello...hello...Cindy...Cindy! Did you even bother...bother...to read...to read...Grocott's column...column? Is your only reaction...reaction...to knee jerk...to knee jerk...to knee jerk?

Dirk van Ulden

Hi Cindy - do you just dislike the author or is it a case of 'hear, see nothing". He is relaying some issues that are not reported in most news channels. I find his columns highly educational and informative. It is hard to disagree with facts but, then again, these stories do apparently not conform to your desired narrative.

SunshineBand

I don't understand the fervor of supporting a "wall" on the Mexico border for a few reasons: it is a colossal waste of money, it is a vanity project to an authoritarian president, and any wall can also be used to keep us in. See "Berlin Wall" for further information. These things happen in increments, and if you don't see the increments, you're not paying attention. (And likely watching Fox News.)

Terence Y

So, Ms. Sunshine, you would rather blow $100 billion on the Train to Nowhere from Flush-it-Down Jerry Brown? Maybe you can run an experiment by leaving open the front and back “walls†to your residence and to your car and see what happens. Better yet, maybe you can convince your friends and family and even Gavin “I’d love to meet your wife†Newsom to do the same with their residences and cars. Thank goodness the wall is being built in increments, both publicly and privately.

JME

Re: HSR >>>On August 13, 2008, California Assembly Bill 3034 (AB 3034) was approved by the state legislature and signed by Republican Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger on August 26, 2008.[24] The bill was submitted to California voters in the November 2008 election as Proposition 1A and approved.

loucovey

I’m not exactly sure what a first-term Lt. Gov. who has no real authority can do for the labor unions so I guess I’ll just wait and see. However, providing $98 million to provide health care in order to save $1 billion in emergency room charges to the state’s Medical-Cal budget seems like a good investment. It’s already been established that private construction is cheaper than government-funded construction, so let’s just stop wanting the government to build border walls. Let private citizens buy the land and put up their own walls. Problem solved.

Seasoned Observer

I would tend to agree that spending $98 million to save $1 billion makes sense. Although in this case I have serious reservations that if we provide health benefits as proposed we will ever see a $1 billion reduction in how much is budgeted to operate emergency rooms. The way these studies are conducted and the way government budgets for its operations are far too nuanced.

Cindy Cornell

The author needs to start having breakfast with a more diverse group of people. Seems he is stuck in an echo chamber.

Terence Y

Hey, aren’t you the same Cindy Cornell who asked why Mr. Grocott was chosen to be a frequent columnist in the Daily Journal? I guess you now know the answer since you take the time to read his columns and to go through the trouble to comment on them. Thanks for your opinion and for being a fan of Mr. Grocott’s column.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.

Thank you for visiting the Daily Journal.

Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading. To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.

We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.

A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!

Want to join the discussion?

Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.

Already a subscriber? Login Here