Understandably, former San Jose Mayor Sam Liccardo would like us to think it is all but over in the general election race for the 16th Congressional District, and that his now-sole challenger Evan Low has little or no chance of upending the conventional wisdom.

Of course, conventional wisdom often is neither, and it is a long way to Nov. 5.

Recommended for you

Recommended for you

(3) comments

Terence Y

Mr. Simon, thanks for another informative column. Seems most politics around here ends up, when only Dems run, of becoming a choice of the lesser of two (or all) evils, as they say. As for the Sheriff’s advisory commission, I’m surprised the number is only 78. I’d figure more folks would want to get their hands on the $3.5 million slush fund which pays out $500/day per member per meeting. (At least these were the numbers around 6 months ago.) A waste of taxpayer money which also perversely incentivizes folks in the commission to make a mountain out of every molehill and to meet as many times as possible to shoot the breeze while not making any decisions or conclusions. After all, more money in their pockets by keeping that $500/day per meeting rolling as long as possible. Perhaps we need an advisory commission (who’s incentivized to reduce the number of advisory commission meetings) for the advisory commission.

NancyG

There is no stipend for the commission members, it is entirely volunteer. And as Mark says, it is advisory only, it does not have oversight authority. See its website at https://www.smcgov.org/ceo/independent-civilian-advisory-commission-sheriffs-office

Terence Y

NancyG, thanks for your response, but your link doesn’t address fiscal impacts. Below are two links related to the commission and as you can see from the first link, there is a fiscal impact. The second link reports the estimated $3.5 million price tag, along with the $500/individual/meeting price tag. If you have newer information, I’m sure many of us would like to see how much more of our taxpayer money will be wasted for an advisory committee potentially made up of folks who have no experience with law enforcement. Again, there’s a perverse incentive to make mountains out of every molehill and to meet as often as possible…

https://www.coastsidebuzz.com/san-mateo-county-supervisors-establish-an-independent-civilian-advisory-commission-to-work-with-the-sheriff/

https://www.almanacnews.com/news/2023/11/02/san-mateo-county-board-of-supervisors-agrees-that-sheriffs-office-needs-some-type-of-oversight/

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.

Thank you for visiting the Daily Journal.

Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading. To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.

We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.

A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!

Want to join the discussion?

Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.

Already a subscriber? Login Here