Democrats look to long term as North Carolina GOP redistricting plan seeks another seat for Trump

With Republicans in the majority in both General Assembly chambers and state law preventing Democratic Gov. Josh Stein from using his veto stamp against a redistricting plan, the GOP-drawn map appeared headed to enactment after final House votes as soon as Wednesday.

The boundary changes attempt to satisfy Trump’s call for states led by Republicans to conduct mid-decade redistricting to gain more seats and retain his party’s grip on Congress in the 2026 midterm elections. Democrats need to gain just three more seats to seize control of the House, and the president’s party historically has lost seats in midterm elections.

Still, about 300 protesters, Democratic Party officials and lawmakers gathering outside the old state Capitol pledged repeatedly Tuesday that redrawing the congressional map would have negative consequences for the GOP at the ballot box in 2026 and beyond. Litigation to challenge the enactment on the map also is likely on allegations of unlawful racial gerrymandering.

“We know we may not have the ability to stop the Republicans in Raleigh right now ... but we are here to show that people across this state and across this nation are watching them,” North Carolina Democratic Party chair Anderson Clayton said to cheers.

The gathering served Democrats to censure state Republicans they accuse of agreeing to kneel to Trump through a corrupt redrawing of district lines to target Davis.

State GOP leaders defended their action, saying Trump has won the state’s electoral votes all three times that he’s run for president — albeit narrowly — and thus merits more potential support in Congress.

The national redistricting battle began over the summer when Trump urged Republican-led Texas to reshape its U.S. House districts. After Texas lawmakers acted, California Democrats reciprocated by passing their own plan, which still needs voter approval in November.

Republicans argue that other Democratic-leaning states had already given themselves a disproportionate number of seats well before this national redistricting fight started.

“It is incumbent upon us to react to this environment, to respond to this environment, and not let these tactics that have happened in blue states dominate the control of Congress,” state Sen. Ralph Hise, the map's chief author, said during Tuesday's Senate debate.

Several speakers at the Democrats' rally roused the crowd’s outrage at what they criticized as a speedy and unfair redistricting process deliberately designed to grab the seat that Davis won by less than 2 percentage points in 2024.

Texas state Rep. Nicole Collier, who took part in a two-week legislative walkout in her state opposition to the pro-Trump redistricting, encouraged those present to vote in upcoming elections and ensure others they know to do likewise.

“Everybody needs to be bothered but not deterred,” Collier said.

Democrats allege the proposed map creates a racial gerrymander that would dismantle decades of voting rights progress for those who live in what's known as North Carolina's ‘Black Belt’ region.

“Shame on this General Assembly, shame on North Carolina for silencing the will of the people of northeastern North Carolina,” former Democratic U.S. Rep. Eva Clayton told the House redistricting committee. The 91-year-old Clayton became the first Black member of Congress to represent North Carolina in 90 years with her 1st District election in 1992.

Republicans counter than no such gerrymandering occurred. They said no racial data was used in forming the districts and there is no legal significant evidence of racially polarized voting that would warrant drawing 1st District boundaries with race as a predominant consideration.

“The purpose of this map was to pick up a Republican seat. We’ve stated that over and over again,” Hise said.