Skip to main content
You have permission to edit this article.
Edit

Advocacy group seeks Ford Explorer recall due to fumes

  • Updated
  • 0
Ford Explorer

Ford says Explorers are safe, owner complaints have decreased and the free service has addressed the exhaust odors. The company says anyone who isn’t satisfied with the repairs should contact their dealership “for further inspection.”

 

DETROIT (AP) — A nonprofit auto safety advocacy group is asking Ford to recall 1.35 million Explorer SUVs due to continued complaints of exhaust fumes in the passenger compartments.

The Center for Auto Safety says it found 44 complaints in a government database about fumes and potential carbon monoxide after owners had taken Explorers in for free repairs in a Ford customer service campaign that started last October.

The center made its request in a letter to Ford CEO Jim Hackett this week.

The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration has been investigating the problem for two years in police and civilian Explorers from the 2011 through 2017 model years, but it has not reached a conclusion.

Ford says Explorers are safe, owner complaints have decreased and the free service has addressed the exhaust odors. The company says anyone who isn’t satisfied with the repairs should contact their dealership “for further inspection.”

In the service, Ford said mechanics would check for leaks in the rear lift gate gaskets and drain valves. If any leaks are found, they’ll be sealed or gaskets will be replaced to prevent fumes from entering. They’ll also reprogram the air conditioning to let in more fresh air.

“The continued complaints and corresponding reports of incidents and injuries demonstrate the problem of carbon monoxide exposure inside Ford Explorers has not been resolved,” Jason Levine, the center’s executive director, said in a statement. Based on complaints, Levine said the problem seems to have continued into model year 2018 Explorers “suggesting that the issue apparently has not been designed out of the vehicle.”

Levine said he thinks NHTSA would look into the effectiveness of a recall if 44 owners complained that the remedy did not work.

The center also said Ford and NHTSA should do a recall “before tragedy strikes” from a driver or passenger being overcome by fumes.

Prior to October of last year, Ford had focused on fixing only law enforcement versions of the Explorer. But while maintaining the civilian versions were safe, the company said it decided to do a service campaign for them in response to customer concerns about odors and carbon monoxide.

NHTSA began its investigation of Explorers in July of 2016.

The agency said previously that tiny cracks in the exhaust manifold — a cast iron or stainless steel tube that carries combustion gasses to the exhaust — could explain why fumes are entering the cabin. But Ford has said there is no pathway for exhaust to escape from the manifold into the car.

NHTSA said in a statement Tuesday that it is testing multiple civilian and law enforcement vehicles and doing field inspections of vehicles involved in complaints. The agency also says it’s testing and monitoring the effectiveness of Ford’s customer service repair campaigns. It says consumers can report potential safety issues to NHTSA.gov or by calling (888) 327-4236.

Recommended for you

(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.

Thank you for visiting the Daily Journal.

Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading. To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.

We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.

A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!

Want to join the discussion?

Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.

Already a subscriber? Login Here

Trending Stories

Featured Events

Recent Comments on our Stories

  • Providing Feedback said:

    The reason a loudspeaker was necessary was because Ms. Corzo cut people off and muted their mikes during the only "listening" session the proj…

    View more

  • joebob91 said:

    Bringing a loudspeaker indoors and cutting off other speakers is not a good-faith community response. It is bullying and shows little interest…

    View more

  • Dirk van Ulden said:

    Aileen - could it be that many of us doubt the urgency of sea level rise? At least in the SF Bay there is no discernable rise at all. Many of …

    View more

  • Connie Weiss said:

    Not sure what prompted you to write a hit piece on Taso Zografos and the controversy over the location of the detox center, but I am a residen…

    View more

Latest e-Edition

The Daily Journal in your inbox

If you have an event you'd like to list on the site, submit it now!