A group of San Mateo neighborhood associations is raising concern about a recent 14-story development proposal in the city’s downtown.
The proposed mixed-use building, located on the northeast corner of El Camino Real and East Fourth Avenue, would include 236 residential rental units, ground floor retail and restaurants and three floors of office space at the top of the building, according to the city’s website. If constructed, it would be one of the tallest buildings in the city.
A letter from San Mateo United, the group representing all the city’s neighborhood associations, said it hopes that the developer, Mecah Ventures, will assure residents that the “building will enhance — not overpower — our cherished skyline.”
Mike Field, owner of Mecah Ventures, who has also spearheaded numerous development projects in the city, said significant time and investment went into making sure the building design at 1 E. Fourth Ave. fit in with the downtown area.
“Architecture is always in the eye of the beholder. We spent an incredible amount of time trying to make this as fantastic of a project as we could while also helping it to fit into the area,” he said. “There isn't a building I’ve ever built where a small minority of our community didn't complain about our architecture.”
SMU President Thomas Morgan said he also hopes traffic and transit impacts are taken into account as well.
“If we put more housing closer to downtown or Hayward Park, it should be on the table that we match the [Caltrain] service to where the people are,” Morgan said. “It seems like public transit is unfortunately favoring jobs and not housing.”
Recommended for you
But much of the neighborhood feedback will be at the developer’s discretion. Because of its proximity to a major transit station, the downtown Caltrain station, the site is exempt from some local requirements, including parking minimums. And to comply with its state-mandated growth targets — which stipulate it must approve 7,015 units between 2023-31 — the city put Measure T on the ballot last year, which voters passed. The new policy extends height and density limits in certain parts of the city, such as areas near Caltrain stops.
The letter also says SMU wants a higher share of affordable units than the 36 proposed.
“People want to see housing that works for teachers, first responders, tradespeople and young professionals, not just high-end luxury units,” the letter states.
Morgan said the proposal follows a concerning trend of housing development that isn’t centered on homeownership. All of the units in the new building would be rentals.
“With the mix of housing growth, with the General Plan, and Measure T, people were told that there would be more housing for the missing middle and for the teachers, police officers, public safety and trades workers,” he said, adding that the highest earners are easily able to outbid middle class for housing units. “They can pretty much pay whatever they want, and other people can't easily compete.”
Field countered that the lack of housing is a supply issue, which was exacerbated by cities constraining housing development. He added that the number of affordable units is double what is required by the city, and that the project is also targeted to single-family homeowners who want to stay in San Mateo but don’t want to, or can’t afford to, continue with additional property costs.
“Our target here is to free up single-family homes. In addition to that we are going to provide almost 40 [below-market-rate units, and all these units are larger floor plans,” Field said. “Measure T was designed to create inventory, to create housing, which will allow the ecosystem in San Mateo to work properly.”
I am in favor of this development. We need to build more housing. This is exactly the kind of transit friendly housing the Bay Area needs. Where are our children and grandchildren going to live? Many of those who complain live in huge houses with 1-2 people. That's part of the problem as well.
My adults children all moved out of San Mateo. Why?? Because they all wanted to set down roots in an area where they could afford to buy a single family home. None of them was ever interested in living in a high-rise.
Kevin - as others have confirmed, your children and grandchildren will be able to purchase single family homes if they they pursue professions that will support them financially. Our three adult, and married, children purchased homes at prices that still floor me, but they did. Hard work, picking the right majors in college, and not counting on parent support, made it happen for them. They started out as boomerang kids, moved to apartments and eventually made purchases no matter how outrageous the prices were, in my opinion. It works for them and it will for others when they focus and are realists. Yes, we live in a large home which I will not leave until the funeral service carries me out. My wife and I worked and slaved for it while it is also a homestead for our growing immediate family. It is not part of the problem in my opinion but a blessing. We are not yet living in the Soviet Union.
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(3) comments
I am in favor of this development. We need to build more housing. This is exactly the kind of transit friendly housing the Bay Area needs. Where are our children and grandchildren going to live? Many of those who complain live in huge houses with 1-2 people. That's part of the problem as well.
My adults children all moved out of San Mateo. Why?? Because they all wanted to set down roots in an area where they could afford to buy a single family home. None of them was ever interested in living in a high-rise.
Kevin - as others have confirmed, your children and grandchildren will be able to purchase single family homes if they they pursue professions that will support them financially. Our three adult, and married, children purchased homes at prices that still floor me, but they did. Hard work, picking the right majors in college, and not counting on parent support, made it happen for them. They started out as boomerang kids, moved to apartments and eventually made purchases no matter how outrageous the prices were, in my opinion. It works for them and it will for others when they focus and are realists. Yes, we live in a large home which I will not leave until the funeral service carries me out. My wife and I worked and slaved for it while it is also a homestead for our growing immediate family. It is not part of the problem in my opinion but a blessing. We are not yet living in the Soviet Union.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.