Requests to either declare a mistrial or dismiss the charges against Scott Peterson were denied yesterday by the presiding judge who ruled there was no prosecutorial misconduct after a police investigator allegedly lied under oath.
"There is more than 40,000 pages of discovery ... In a case of this magnitude these type of things are going to happen," said Judge Al Delucchi.
Delucchi did add, "Unfortunately, they keep happening with Detective Brocchini."
Testimony by Allen Brocchini, Modesto police's lead investigator in the disappearance of Laci Peterson, was at the heart of the mistrial request by defense attorney Mark Geragos. Citing time after time when Brocchini either left out interview information from reports or lied on the stand, Geragos asked that his client be freed. Geragos suggested Brocchini purposely made errors in hopes of having a mistrial - and another shot for he and prosecutors to find Peterson guilty of killing his wife and unborn son.
The alleged lies and errors also put Geragos in a Catch-22 because he should ask for a mistrial but worried that a new trial would give the prosecution a fresh shot, he said.
Attorneys grilled Brocchini for five days on the stand. Brocchini testified about a tip that Peterson once claimed he'd dispose of a body by duct taping a bag around the neck and sinking it in the ocean. Geragos pointed out that the caller never mentioned duct tape and Brocchini mentioned it simply, he said yesterday, "to stir the pot ... against my client."
Delucchi told attorneys they are at liberty to recall Brocchini for more testimony but suggested the jury could make up its own mind.
Recommended for you
"It may be prudent for both sides to just leave it alone," Delucchi said.
Yesterday's hearings filled the entire morning and emphasized again how entrenched the media has become in the sensationalized case. Aside from the refusal to vacate the trial, Delucchi squashed a subpoena for pictures taken by a Modesto Bee photographer. The pictures, taken at a December 2002 vigil for the missing woman, show her husband smiling despite the grim circumstances.
"These photographs are absolutely relevant. The defendant's conduct is very important to this case," said Prosecutor Rick Distaso.
Delucchi will allow the one photo that was printed but prosecutors cannot introduce others.
Delucchi also denied a defense request for unaired footage of an interview with Good Morning America anchor Diane Sawyer. Geragos argued that the televised interview, which is admissible as evidence, is filled with false information from the early days of the investigation. Distaso countered once again that he is not trying to prove facts, just Peterson's state of mind.
Peterson, 31, is charged with two counts of first-degree murder and faces the death penalty if convicted of killing his family on or near Dec. 24, 2002. The bodies of Laci and Conner Peterson washed up on a Richmond shore the following April.
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(0) comments
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.