Tom Williams

Tom Williams

After being issued a permit and spending upwards of $100,000 on construction and materials, a Millbrae couple attempting to build a backyard dwelling for an ailing grandmother received a stop work order — originating from the city manager who lives behind the couple’s home.

Lisa and Joel Timpano were issued a permit for an accessory dwelling unit March 9 this year and, soon after, began construction on the 400-square-foot flat to be attached to their home. But nearly three months into the job, on May 26, with a rear deck removed, foundation laid and framing erected, the couple was ordered to stop work, scrap the progress and redesign the unit with a reduced height.

Recommended for you

corey@smdailyjournal.com

(650) 344-5200, ext. 105

Recommended for you

(15) comments

craigwiesner

Thank you for this story! Please stay on it. Hopefully the Planning Commission can make an exception and allow this project to move forward.

Tim.hanretty

Something is not right here, in my opinion. If there was a typo, the mistake needs to be honored. That’s what educated, and fair people do.

steve.claesson

Complete bs from the city of millbrae. My experience with their building department (although 10+ years ago) is utter incompetence. It would be helpful to have some images of the crawlspace. If it is indeed a quasi first level then maybe the city has a point. But if the city manager just doesn't like his neighbors APPROVED construction he shouldn't be able to order a work stoppage.

CharlieBrown

Make sure to read the last sentence of the story! Thanks for including that information.

M&T Violette

Thanks Charlie for saying what I was going add. Kudos to Corey Browning for adding that tidbit of info on the managers past. What a little finkster. Shame on Millbrae. looks like they didn't spend as much time vetting Williams as they did to stick it to their own citizens.

Terence Y

I wonder why the last sentence was added to the story. Was it to color the commentary against Mr. Williams? Was it an attempt to demonize Mr. Williams and imply the Timpanos are in the right? Is the writer hoping “allegedly” will not be taken into account? Actually, per some of these comments, the writer’s hope appears to have been met. It should only be fair that the Internet search shovel applied to dig up dirt on Mr. Williams should also be applied to the Timpano’s. Or this last sentence should have been deleted. From the article, it sounds like Mr. Williams saw something, so he said something. It also sounds like other decision-makers within the planning and building departments agreed.

mmautner

Terence, Mr Williams is the planning & building department employees' boss. This is inherent to why this is a "conflict of interest" story, and not as simple as you are trying to make it out to be.

Terence Y

mmautner – why is this a “conflict of interest” story? Mr. Williams saw something so he said something. Are you implying there’s some sort of conspiracy among the planning and building department (do you know something we don’t?) – with no evidence? Similar to the allegations made in the article? Perhaps the court of public opinion needs to have more info to equalize the bias. If we’re going to start including non-related allegations, we may as well provide positions on other issues. Such as which party voted for President Trump, which party is for or against abortion, which party is for or against our Second Amendment rights, etc. And any other positions on the causes du jour, regardless of how insignificant…

Seema

The Timpanos should consult with a lawyer familiar with state ADU law. Page 13 of HCD's ADU handbook states, "local agencies may impose height limits provided that the limit is no less than 16 feet."

Gov. Code, § 65852.2. subd. (c)(2)(C) states:

(c)(2) Notwithstanding paragraph (1), a local agency shall not establish by ordinance any of the following: (C) Any other minimum or maximum size for an accessory dwelling unit, size based upon a percentage of the proposed or existing primary dwelling, or limits on lot coverage, floor area ratio, open space, and minimum lot size, for either attached or detached dwellings that does not permit at least an 800 square foot accessory dwelling unit that is at least 16 feet in height with four-foot side and rear yard setbacks to be constructed in compliance with all other local development standards."

https://www.hcd.ca.gov/policy-research/docs/adu_december_2020_handbook.pdf

https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?sectionNum=65852.2.&nodeTreePath=10.1.10.2&lawCode=GOV

Cathy Baird

This is just mean. Millbrae, work with them to find a way to continue building their ADU.

willallen

Stay on this, Daily Journal. Can't city council take some action?

smmikee

Terrific reporting by Corey Browning

willallen

yes. outstanding.

Renabk

Wow, even if Millbrae officials acted ethically within the boundaries of their jobs, they sure do not give the appearance of doing so. The chain of events reeks of cronyism. Nor is Millbrae taking responsibility for misrepresenting their ADU code or approving the building plan, and now they have “interpreted” it to the detriment of a family who actually needs an ADU. I hope they get the relief they deserve.

mmautner

Excellent article—this Tom Williams is sketchy. I’m no lawyer but the Timpanos sound like they have got recourse to sue the city of Millbrae for damages.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.

Thank you for visiting the Daily Journal.

Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading. To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.

We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.

A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!

Want to join the discussion?

Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.

Already a subscriber? Login Here