After being issued a permit and spending upwards of $100,000 on construction and materials, a Millbrae couple attempting to build a backyard dwelling for an ailing grandmother received a stop work order — originating from the city manager who lives behind the couple’s home.
Lisa and Joel Timpano were issued a permit for an accessory dwelling unit March 9 this year and, soon after, began construction on the 400-square-foot flat to be attached to their home. But nearly three months into the job, on May 26, with a rear deck removed, foundation laid and framing erected, the couple was ordered to stop work, scrap the progress and redesign the unit with a reduced height.
“We were told they had a typo in the ordinance and everyone involved had missed it,” Joel Timpano said. “We could not believe our ears.”
According to emails reviewed by the Daily Journal, City Manager Tom Williams in a late night message to city staff requested the order be placed, citing a crawl space he believed was not within the city’s code and an overall height limit breach.
The city’s code states an ADU must be single-story and not exceed 16 feet tall, rules the Timpanos say the unit will heed. But a crawl space upon which the unit was being built, which measures several feet tall on the rear portion of the sloping lot, Williams argued was out of compliance and was closer to a first floor.
“I looked at it because I could see it, and saw that it looked like it exceeded the height and some other things, that the construction of it didn’t appear that it met the ADU ordinance,” Williams said. “I took that and reported it to community development and building [departments] to take a look at it, and then I stepped away.”
In his May 25 email to building inspector Jake Gonzales, Williams wrote “please issue a stop work order tomorrow and have the applicant submit a redesign eliminating the first story.”
An email the next morning from the city’s Community Development Director Darcy Smith to Gonzales reads “Tom is asking if a stop work had been issued yet?” The email also notes research into the code compliance issue was underway. Six minutes later a reply from Gonzales states “it will be issued within the next 30 minutes.”
Smith said despite the quick turnaround, she and others from the city’s planning and building departments thoroughly reviewed the issue. She emphasized that Chief Building Official Keyvan Irannejad is the only member of city staff with authority to issue a stop work order, per state law.
“Once the city manager inquired, we went through a very comprehensive and detailed process to research this further,” Smith said. “I dropped everything and worked on it all afternoon, came in early the next morning and worked on it, I looked at the plans, I looked at the pictures.”
The stop work order, she said, was issued both because the “plate height” (essentially the ceiling height) for the structure would have been higher than the city’s ADU ordinance intended to allow, and that the construction observed by building inspectors did not comply with the plans submitted by the Timpanos.
In a letter sent to the couple June 10, Smith said plans showed a 4-foot-2-inch crawl space. Attached are photos of construction progress that appear to show the space is multiple feet taller.
But the plate height issue was the product of a typo in the city’s ADU ordinance. The city’s code states the plate height was not to be taller than 9 feet for detached ADUs, excluding crawl space height where applicable. Not mentioned in the ordinance, however, was such a rule for attached ADUs like the Timpanos, something Smith said was a mistake. Further, dimensions for crawl spaces are not included in the city’s code.
“The code does not explicitly define how to measure the plate height, so when that happens we come up with an interpretive definition,” Smith said. She said she reviewed past city meeting documents to arrive at an 18-inch maximum crawl space height.
Regarding revoking the previously approved permit, “It happens,” she said. “I’d love to say this never ever happens, but it happened. And, as a city official, I’m sworn to enforce the municipal code … they don’t have a vested right in a building permit that was invalid when issued, even if they’ve expended substantial funds in reliance on that.”
Williams similarly pointed to his obligation to report code violations, and said he did not want people to think he was playing favorites with his neighbors.
“Nor do I want people to think I’m trying to not have something happen, because obviously we support accessory dwelling units, we support, obviously, the need for housing and all that, but people have to do it right, they can’t take advantage of, or not follow, the rules,” he said.
But the Timpanos said they believe Williams was motivated by not wanting to see the unit from his backyard, which is kitty-corner to theirs. The unit is on the side of the yard closest to Williams, and would rise well above the fence.
“That crawl space is not why he’s stopping our project,” said Joel Timpano, who described being “sick for weeks” as a result of stress, anxiety and financial worries following the order to stop work.
“We are $150,000 into our project and they asked us to scrap it,” he said. “I have been asking for a building official to come out and go over any discrepancies with our project and make any necessary adjustments so we can pull the stop work order and resume, no one has responded.”
Lisa Timpano said her father died late last year and her mother, who suffers several health issues, lives two hours away and cannot remain by herself.
“We have no desire to fight with the city of Millbrae,” she said, “I have lost much sleep and my stomach is in knots over my mother’s future and the severe financial loss we would experience.”
She said they do not have the money to start over, and are hoping for a compromise with the city. She added that during a meeting with Smith and Irannejad to go over the issue, Smith repeatedly warned the couple that litigation against the city would not be successful.
‘A challenging situation’
Smith said the city attorney was looking into the matter, and also being looked at was the feasibility of certain exemptions from the city’s code to allow the project to proceed, decisions that would ultimately need to be made by the city’s Planning Commission.
“I’m not sure the findings would be able to be met, so I don’t have an answer on that. We’re looking into it,” she said. “It is a challenging situation.”
Williams was hired as the city manager in 2018. He previously served as the city manager in Milpitas, a post he resigned from after allegedly using taxpayer money to pay personal attorney fees.
(15) comments
Thank you for this story! Please stay on it. Hopefully the Planning Commission can make an exception and allow this project to move forward.
Something is not right here, in my opinion. If there was a typo, the mistake needs to be honored. That’s what educated, and fair people do.
Complete bs from the city of millbrae. My experience with their building department (although 10+ years ago) is utter incompetence. It would be helpful to have some images of the crawlspace. If it is indeed a quasi first level then maybe the city has a point. But if the city manager just doesn't like his neighbors APPROVED construction he shouldn't be able to order a work stoppage.
Make sure to read the last sentence of the story! Thanks for including that information.
Thanks Charlie for saying what I was going add. Kudos to Corey Browning for adding that tidbit of info on the managers past. What a little finkster. Shame on Millbrae. looks like they didn't spend as much time vetting Williams as they did to stick it to their own citizens.
I wonder why the last sentence was added to the story. Was it to color the commentary against Mr. Williams? Was it an attempt to demonize Mr. Williams and imply the Timpanos are in the right? Is the writer hoping “allegedly” will not be taken into account? Actually, per some of these comments, the writer’s hope appears to have been met. It should only be fair that the Internet search shovel applied to dig up dirt on Mr. Williams should also be applied to the Timpano’s. Or this last sentence should have been deleted. From the article, it sounds like Mr. Williams saw something, so he said something. It also sounds like other decision-makers within the planning and building departments agreed.
Terence, Mr Williams is the planning & building department employees' boss. This is inherent to why this is a "conflict of interest" story, and not as simple as you are trying to make it out to be.
mmautner – why is this a “conflict of interest” story? Mr. Williams saw something so he said something. Are you implying there’s some sort of conspiracy among the planning and building department (do you know something we don’t?) – with no evidence? Similar to the allegations made in the article? Perhaps the court of public opinion needs to have more info to equalize the bias. If we’re going to start including non-related allegations, we may as well provide positions on other issues. Such as which party voted for President Trump, which party is for or against abortion, which party is for or against our Second Amendment rights, etc. And any other positions on the causes du jour, regardless of how insignificant…
The Timpanos should consult with a lawyer familiar with state ADU law. Page 13 of HCD's ADU handbook states, "local agencies may impose height limits provided that the limit is no less than 16 feet."
Gov. Code, § 65852.2. subd. (c)(2)(C) states:
(c)(2) Notwithstanding paragraph (1), a local agency shall not establish by ordinance any of the following: (C) Any other minimum or maximum size for an accessory dwelling unit, size based upon a percentage of the proposed or existing primary dwelling, or limits on lot coverage, floor area ratio, open space, and minimum lot size, for either attached or detached dwellings that does not permit at least an 800 square foot accessory dwelling unit that is at least 16 feet in height with four-foot side and rear yard setbacks to be constructed in compliance with all other local development standards."
https://www.hcd.ca.gov/policy-research/docs/adu_december_2020_handbook.pdf
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displaySection.xhtml?sectionNum=65852.2.&nodeTreePath=10.1.10.2&lawCode=GOV
This is just mean. Millbrae, work with them to find a way to continue building their ADU.
Stay on this, Daily Journal. Can't city council take some action?
Terrific reporting by Corey Browning
yes. outstanding.
Wow, even if Millbrae officials acted ethically within the boundaries of their jobs, they sure do not give the appearance of doing so. The chain of events reeks of cronyism. Nor is Millbrae taking responsibility for misrepresenting their ADU code or approving the building plan, and now they have “interpreted” it to the detriment of a family who actually needs an ADU. I hope they get the relief they deserve.
Excellent article—this Tom Williams is sketchy. I’m no lawyer but the Timpanos sound like they have got recourse to sue the city of Millbrae for damages.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.