A federal judge on Tuesday sided with San Francisco over Oakland in a legal dispute over a name change to Oakland’s airport.
The Port of Oakland earlier this year approved changing the city’s airport name to San Francisco Bay Oakland International Airport, prompting San Francisco’s city attorney in September to ask for a preliminary injunction to halt the name change, saying it infringed on their trademark for San Francisco International Airport and confused travelers.
U.S. Magistrate Judge Thomas Hixson on Tuesday sided with San Francisco, saying that it is likely to prevail in the pending court case on the claim that the name change “falsely implies affiliation, connection and association” between the two airports, which go by the three-letter codes of SFO and OAK.
“Because in the United States the name of a city is normally in the name of an airport only if the city owns or partially owns that airport, the new name for the Oakland airport strongly implies affiliation with San Francisco and the San Francisco International Airport,” Hixson wrote.
The Port of Oakland, which oversees the city’s airport, in a statement that they “are continuing to review the recent ruling and considering all available options.”
Recommended for you
The port said, “OAK is not associated with SFO, of course, but is rather a convenient and centrally located option for travelers throughout the Bay Area.”
San Francisco City Attorney David Chiu said in a statement that city officials had worked with Oakland on alternative name changes for the airport but were rebuffed.
“We had no choice but to ask the court to step in and protect our trademark,” Chiu said. “San Francisco has invested millions in making San Francisco International Airport the world class airport it is today. We have built an incredible brand, and we are happy the court agreed that brand should be legally protected from trademark infringement.”
The judge’s order blocks the use of San Francisco Bay Oakland International Airport as a name in advertising, marketing or other services related to the airport until the pending trial on the lawsuit between the two cities is resolved.
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(0) comments
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.