After growing in size earlier this year and undergoing several design changes, the latest iteration of a San Mateo affordable housing proposal has earned the enthusiastic support of the Planning Commission and numerous residents.

Located on city-owned land at 480 E. Fourth Ave. and 400 E. Fifth Ave., the project includes 225 below-market-rate units in a seven-story building. A pedestrian bridge would connect the residential building to a five-level publicly accessible parking structure.

Recommended for you

Recommended for you

(8) comments

mnash900

I watched the Planning Commission meeting on this topic and want to add my voice in support of the project. We need affordable housing, not luxury housing. This is a great opportunity to add to our supply of housing that people can afford. One principle that I hear from many affordable housing advocates is the need to maintain standards for affordable housing that are equal to those for other projects in the area. This test is important to be sure we build housing that people want to live in. The Commission discussion had several comments on how to improve the project from Ellen Mallory and Margaret Williams. These points are critical to achieving the goal of providing a building we can be proud of. The article does not report that the Commission was unanimous only in support of the project but not its current design. Let's hope that Mid-Pen will respond to the constructive comments made by these Commissioners.

bek

So cool how the phrase "luxury housing" is only ever applied to apartments, and never huge luxury McMansions like what Mr. Moneybags Nash probably lives in. [rolleyes]

Most of San Mateo is zoned ONLY for luxury housing buyers. Single-family homes that cost >$1 million are not anywhere close to affordable for most working people.

Christopher Conway

So don't buy them. If you can't afford something that is not the fault of society, affordable housing advocates need to remember Economics 101.

Alexander Melendrez

61 additional affordable homes for our essential workers and our most vulnerable community members. Every additional new affordable home added is another secured, shelter with a name, a face, a family, and a story. I'm so proud of San Mateo and I can't wait to see this move forward to City Council!

mweinhauer

To further clarify, Commissioner Mallory was spot on in her criticisms of the project. Those criticisms are ignored in the report out, and this article.We thank Commissioner Mallory for being the lone voice of support for the legitimate concerns of residents.

mweinhauer

This is a completely inaccurate article. Many here in the community, particularly Central Neighborhood (where the project will be built), do not like this redesign at all. We were very supportive of the original 5-story design, but this redesign has actually drawn a lot of criticism around it's design, parking, traffic impacts, and lack of public space, among other things. These legitimate criticisms have been largely ignored by the Planning Commission, MidPen, the City Council, and now apparently the SMDJ. This sets a terrible precedent for both development and journalism in San Mateo. We have to do better.

Cynthia Newton

I concur with mweinhauer, how this and the Passages project were portrayed as "high praise" with out any mention of the controversy there has been on both projects is beyond me. We all want affordable housing but all of the issues mentioned: height, parking, traffic impacts, lack of public space, are a big concern to many. The Passages project is just, if not, more controversial. This article did nothing to address these issues.

Christopher Conway

here is hoping the organizations and politicians listen to the concerns of the existing population that live near the project. I have been on the other end of getting affordable housing shoved down our throats and it will take a community effort on your part to get them to listen. In this virus dominated time, that is going to be tough. Good luck

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.

Thank you for visiting the Daily Journal.

Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading. To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.

We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.

A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!

Want to join the discussion?

Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.

Already a subscriber? Login Here