Foster City is concerned about meeting its 471% increased housing allocation quota from the state, prompting the City Council to reach out to local and state organizations to find realistic solutions.
Foster City will have to allow for the construction of 2,028 housing units between 2023 and 2031, a 471% increase from the 430 units it had to zone for its last housing cycle, according to a City Council letter sent to the Association of Bay Area Governments Regional Planning Committee.
The City Council, in its letter, wants to work with the Association of Bay Area Governments, or ABAG, to reduce its number allocation or find a compromise to meet its targets. ABAG enforces the Housing Element and Regional Housing Needs Allocation, or RHNA, a state housing mandate determining how many housing units each city must build in an eight-year-cycle. ABAG is currently determining and receiving feedback on its housing allocations for the 2023 to 2031 cycle.
The council’s letter expressed concern about the infeasibility of meeting all housing allocation requirements. The city is worried about the lack of non-vacant residential land and the non-vacant commercial and industrial land. Foster City also asked ABAG to reconsider how it evaluates vacant land and consider that Foster City is a planned city with little room left to grow. The council also questioned why ABAG did not consider the city’s limited access to public transportation and its concerns about providing adequate infrastructure for the new housing units.
Foster City Councilman Jon Froomin said the council wants to find a fair and equitable way to solve its allocation concerns with ABAG. He believes the approach of one-size-fits-all to planning housing in the Bay Area is impossible. Foster City is not a vertical community that can build expansive housing, and the unique planned aspect of the city makes it hard to find partners to address the issue, Froomin said.
“We are at the point where we are really built out. There really isn’t any vacant land that’s available, especially city-controlled land, to do much regarding this issue,” Froomin said.
Foster City Councilwoman Richa Awasthi said she is worried about what it will take to implement and build the new housing required. She wants to find out if meeting the state’s housing numbers is even feasible for the city.
“If you look at the letter and you look at the numbers, they are extremely concerning,” Awasthi said.
Foster City Vice Mayor Sanjay Gehani said he wants to see further analysis from staff about options and possible outreach to other cities on the issue to get opinions.
“We have our unique challenges. My interest is in sharing those challenges with ABAG and with the state and also engage with the cities around us to see if they are having similar challenges,” Gehani said.
Recommended for you
Leah Zippert, an ABAG senior public information officer, said ABAG plans to respond to Foster City’s letter detailing its concerns with the new RHNA housing allocation numbers. Zippert said the allocation numbers are higher this cycle in the region because legislators want to address the housing crisis in the Bay Area and across the state. California gives ABAG the allocation numbers, and ABAG is required to divide it throughout the region.
“It’s trying to solve a problem,” she said.
Zippert said ABAG would respond to the Foster City letter in writing and discuss the comments and further action at an ABAG Executive Board meeting in January. Representatives from ABAG will also likely have further discussions with cities in the region. ABAG will also be hosting two webinars and open office hours over the next few weeks. These webinars and open office hours are specifically designed to provide cities and counties with the opportunity to raise questions and concerns, Zippert said through email. The housing allocation numbers for Foster City are not yet fixed, and Foster City can still have discussions or appeals of allocation numbers, Zippert said.
Foster City has yet to conduct any formal outreach to surrounding cities to discuss the RHNA housing allocation numbers, and city officials in San Mateo and Belmont did not have any plans to start outreach at this time.
The San Mateo City Council in 2019 voted against becoming part of a subregion that would have allowed cities to shift RHNA housing allocations from one city to another in the region.
San Mateo is mostly focused on meeting its RHNA allocation housing numbers rather than starting talks with other cities, San Mateo Deputy Mayor Eric Rodriguez said by email.
San Mateo Councilwoman Diane Papan said through email cities cannot receive RHNA credit for housing units built in another city or trade RHNA allocations. However, she was open to collaboration on other issues of housing.
Belmont Vice Mayor Charles Stone said he is focused at this time on Belmont’s RHNA numbers rather than working with other cities on issues surrounding their numbers.
(650) 344-5200 ext. 102

(4) comments
My suggestion to Foster City is just ignore RHNA and the ABAG as it is unelected board that has no teeth. Foster City should band together with other cities and boycott this arbitrary number of housing starts that was pulled out of mid-air. Cities need to push back and question some of these institutions like ABAG.
This is great advice, Patrick! I, for one, would truly enjoy seeing Foster City get sued by the state over housing element non-compliance, a la Huntington Beach. Terrific outcome.
I bet you would Jordan, I bet you would
Burlingame has ignored RHNA numbers for decades with zero consequences. The only affordable units that are planned are for the upper income ranges of affordability, and the promised Burlingame Village project has languished for six years without being built, so don't worry Foster City. You too can keep adding hundreds, thousands of jobs without adding affordable housing. Congratulations.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.