Foster City saw an unexpected surplus last fiscal year, a result of more favorable revenue sources — including business license taxes, permit revenue and interest income — as well as lower expenses.
The budget for the 2024-25 fiscal year, which ended in June, anticipated a $6.7 million deficit, but the city’s finances ended up going in the other direction with a $7.4 million surplus. The total budget is $71.3 million.
Part of the increase is related to the new business tax, Measure V, which generated about $4 million, roughly $2 million more than projected.
“When we approved the budget, we didn’t know what the result of Measure V would be,” Finance Director Nate Cruz said.
The new structure, which taxes companies based on their revenue not employees, increased the rate for many businesses, ranging from 75 cents per $1,000 in gross receipts to $3 per $1,000 in gross receipts, depending on the firm’s revenue.
Recommended for you
“We ended the year in a very strong position, compared to a budgeted deficit of $6.7 million,” Cruz said. “That also results in a fund balance of almost 110% of expenses.”
The favorable figures are also a result of $2 million more in permit revenue than expected, particularly from a Gilead project on Lakeside Drive, as well as higher interest income. On the expenses side, lower personnel costs due to position vacancies led to more than $4 million in savings. Cruz added that while the city ended up receiving some of its vehicle license fee revenue — a complicated reimbursement-based funding source — it was not initially included in budget projections due to state-level uncertainty.
“Fiscal year 24-25 was the first fiscal year we did not budget shortfall reimbursement from the state,” Cruz said. “It did come through, however, at the last minute.”
According to a staff report, however, the city is still facing financial headwinds, including dips in transient occupancy tax revenue, “which remain below pre-pandemic levels,” as well as “high office vacancy rates and economic uncertainty driven by rapid shifts in federal policy.”
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(0) comments
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.