A yearslong process to establish a vision for improvements and new amenities in San Mateo’s Central Park reached a milestone Monday when city officials unanimously voted to adopt its master plan.
More than four years in the making, the plan was aimed preserving the 16-acre park’s rich history, better serving the diverse set of needs of those who use it and facilitating a downtown connection, among other goals identified through a series of public meetings. Outlining measures to preserve long-standing features like the Japanese Garden and rose garden and new resources such as a new plaza and community building for events along Fifth Avenue and additional picnic tables, the plan is expected to be phased in as more detailed designs and funding are available.
A renovated children’s playground, plaza along Fifth Avenue, an underground parking garage and new restrooms were among the common features included in three plan options presented in 2015.
Daily Journal file photo
Councilwoman Maureen Freschet reflected on fond memories of playing in the park as a child as she commended the plan’s balance between long-standing features and improvements for the city focal point at the edge of downtown.
“Parks are like houses with life cycles that need periodic refreshing and renewal to stay functional and attractive,” she said. “For me, this plan preserves the charm, character and most beloved features of our iconic park while giving it a much-needed update.”
Noting Monday’s meeting was the 16th public hearing held to review the plans, Parks and Recreation Director Sheila Canzian said planners had heard from major parks groups and constituencies along the way and considered their input in drafting the final plan.
“Because of Central Park’s high visibility, we needed to make sure that there was a robust public engagement process, which I believe we achieved,” she said.
Having identified priorities for the park’s new design — including maintaining open space, preserving its history and creating a connection with downtown just north of the park — three plan options were presented to residents in 2015 with a renovated children’s playground, plaza along Fifth Avenue, an underground parking garage and new restrooms among common features across all three plans, according to a staff report.
But concerns about the changes lingered among residents, who reiterated previously stated worries about the loss of three of the park’s six tennis courts and the Central Recreation Center, which is leased by Self-Help for the Elderly.
Jonathan New, who said he’s observed the park’s six tennis courts at capacity on both chilly weeknights as well as Saturday mornings, expressed disappointment with the plan’s inclusion of only three courts. Though the city has committed to replacing the lost courts in other parks, New said he preferred six courts in one place to six courts in multiple places.
Recommended for you
“I don’t understand why you would take away something that is so beloved and so well used,” he said. “I feel like we’ve been heard but I’m not convinced we’ve been listened to.”
Acknowledging a noted preference among the tennis community to have six courts in one park to facilitate tournament play, Canzian said staff has discussed the possibility of building two courts at Beresford Park, which would bring the total number of courts there to six. She added that removing three courts from Central Park and relocating the remaining courts to the southern end of the park would allow planners to include in the plans a plaza along Fifth Avenue, which could likely only be accommodated where the six courts are currently.
As a weekly visitor to the Central Recreation Center, resident Betty Bernstein said she and the others taking aerobics class there enjoy the style of the building and the way it blends in with its surroundings in the park.
“It blends in beautifully with the area,” she said. “It’s just a lovely place to exercise and I’d hate to see it torn down.”
The city is expected to assist the group providing programs for seniors in finding a permanent location in the course of its nine-year lease, according to the report.
In response to concerns about the changes to the tennis court facilities, Mayor Rick Bonilla said he regretted the fact that a compromise had to be made and looked to future opportunities to provide more courts to help with the adjustment. He commended the planning process for including many perspectives and promising to preserve a resource community members of all ages can enjoy.
“In my opinion, it’s going to retain a lot of that quality which I have known about Central Park for many years, which is its timelessness and its serenity, especially the Japanese garden,” he said. “The park is a place where people can go and either just walk or play baseball or sit down and read a book — there’s something for everybody there.”
In other business, the council also decided to hire an executive search team to find City Manager Larry Patterson’s replacement. Patterson announced his plans to retire last week, and though the council will ultimately make a decision on his successor, the executive search team’s work will begin the recruiting process.
So who exactly was it that wanted the commercial plaza? the only folks I see wanting a commercial plaza and wanting to take out the courts, was the downtown business interests (big winner Essex at the Park with their 5 story monster adjoining the park)...certainly it was not the citizens of San Mateo..look at their comments in this process....the same bogus process happened with the so-called citizens advisory committee for Bay Meadows...business interests and labor unions dominated the process...and if you drag the process out for years, the input and concerns of the actual citizens of San Mateo are left in the dust...
I don't support the commercial plaza, the city planners approved corporate financing to the master plan. The only good thing for the park master plan, is that they're renovating the playground, the baseball field, and keeping the tea garden. But it was so wrong to get rid of half the tennis courts, so many people demanded at meetings that tennis courts be in the master plan. Four tennis courts would be fine, also don't even move the tennis courts to other parks, because there's already no room at Beresford nor Bay Meadows, and the long driving distance from Central Park. Leave the other parks alone, Central Park is bigger and serves more people and it's closer to downtown. Don't fix what's not broken.
I think a public plaza for city events will be nice at the edge of downtown. I was disappointed about the lesser number of tennis courts in the park but I am very happy about the addition of tennis courts at Beresford. There are a large number of tennis players in San Mateo and we need more courts. Adding two more courts at Beresford would be a great start!
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(4) comments
Great to hear - this is a beautiful place i remember my mom always taking me as a kid.
So who exactly was it that wanted the commercial plaza? the only folks I see wanting a commercial plaza and wanting to take out the courts, was the downtown business interests (big winner Essex at the Park with their 5 story monster adjoining the park)...certainly it was not the citizens of San Mateo..look at their comments in this process....the same bogus process happened with the so-called citizens advisory committee for Bay Meadows...business interests and labor unions dominated the process...and if you drag the process out for years, the input and concerns of the actual citizens of San Mateo are left in the dust...
I don't support the commercial plaza, the city planners approved corporate financing to the master plan. The only good thing for the park master plan, is that they're renovating the playground, the baseball field, and keeping the tea garden. But it was so wrong to get rid of half the tennis courts, so many people demanded at meetings that tennis courts be in the master plan. Four tennis courts would be fine, also don't even move the tennis courts to other parks, because there's already no room at Beresford nor Bay Meadows, and the long driving distance from Central Park. Leave the other parks alone, Central Park is bigger and serves more people and it's closer to downtown. Don't fix what's not broken.
I think a public plaza for city events will be nice at the edge of downtown. I was disappointed about the lesser number of tennis courts in the park but I am very happy about the addition of tennis courts at Beresford. There are a large number of tennis players in San Mateo and we need more courts. Adding two more courts at Beresford would be a great start!
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.