A yearslong process to establish a vision for improvements and new amenities in San Mateo’s Central Park reached a milestone Monday when city officials unanimously voted to adopt its master plan.

More than four years in the making, the plan was aimed preserving the 16-acre park’s rich history, better serving the diverse set of needs of those who use it and facilitating a downtown connection, among other goals identified through a series of public meetings. Outlining measures to preserve long-standing features like the Japanese Garden and rose garden and new resources such as a new plaza and community building for events along Fifth Avenue and additional picnic tables, the plan is expected to be phased in as more detailed designs and funding are available.

Central PArk

A renovated children’s playground, plaza along Fifth Avenue, an underground parking garage and new restrooms were among the common features included in three plan options presented in 2015.

Recommended for you

Recommended for you

(4) comments

LittleFoot

Great to hear - this is a beautiful place i remember my mom always taking me as a kid.

vincent wei

So who exactly was it that wanted the commercial plaza? the only folks I see wanting a commercial plaza and wanting to take out the courts, was the downtown business interests (big winner Essex at the Park with their 5 story monster adjoining the park)...certainly it was not the citizens of San Mateo..look at their comments in this process....the same bogus process happened with the so-called citizens advisory committee for Bay Meadows...business interests and labor unions dominated the process...and if you drag the process out for years, the input and concerns of the actual citizens of San Mateo are left in the dust...

Mr Eddy

I don't support the commercial plaza, the city planners approved corporate financing to the master plan. The only good thing for the park master plan, is that they're renovating the playground, the baseball field, and keeping the tea garden. But it was so wrong to get rid of half the tennis courts, so many people demanded at meetings that tennis courts be in the master plan. Four tennis courts would be fine, also don't even move the tennis courts to other parks, because there's already no room at Beresford nor Bay Meadows, and the long driving distance from Central Park. Leave the other parks alone, Central Park is bigger and serves more people and it's closer to downtown. Don't fix what's not broken.

Cynthia Newton

I think a public plaza for city events will be nice at the edge of downtown. I was disappointed about the lesser number of tennis courts in the park but I am very happy about the addition of tennis courts at Beresford. There are a large number of tennis players in San Mateo and we need more courts. Adding two more courts at Beresford would be a great start!

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.

Thank you for visiting the Daily Journal.

Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading. To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.

We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.

A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!

Want to join the discussion?

Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.

Already a subscriber? Login Here