A bill introduced by Assemblymember Diane Papan, D-San Mateo, could prohibit employers from compelling workers to use two weeks of paid vacation time before accessing paid family leave benefits.
State-mandated paid family leave provides employees with partial wage benefits if they need time off to bond with a new child, care for a sick relative or participate in a family member’s military event.
The program, instituted in California more than 20 years ago, has been expanded over the years — extending paid leave for up to eight weeks and allocating 90% of wages back for low- to middle-income workers, effective in 2025 onward.
Papan believes the change introduced by her bill would be a common-sense addition to the program, which is funded by mandatory payroll deductions for covered workers through state disability insurance.
“You pay the money,” she said. “You should be able to use it when you need it, without somebody mandating you use your vacation.”
It’s a pared-down version of a bill introduced by Papan last year. The previous version also prohibited employers from forcing workers to use their vacation time before accessing benefits and extended the program to bonding with a child you haven’t formally adopted and allowing families to apply for more than one caregiver in a home.
Recommended for you
While Papan said it’s disappointing to have to cut possible expansions, this version of the bill is realistic given the state government’s current fiscal situation and could pass with minimal pushback.
“Given where we are with the budget, it would have increased burdens on funds,” she said. “We’ll live to fight another day.”
Currently, eligible workers can receive around 60% to 70% of wages earned five to 18 months before the claim start date begins. And making access to those benefits easier is an equity issue, Papan said.
“It’s clearly a detriment to families,” she said. “I think it’s an equity issue, especially to women who disproportionately often use their benefits, because they’re more often the caretakers.”
The bill, which is awaiting approval from the Assembly Appropriations Committee, would create greater flexibility for those dealing with emergency situations like the failing health conditions of a relative.
“It could be a sick spouse, a sick parent. People are living longer, but might need more care,” Papan said. “Family members have to leave their jobs in order to help out with sick or aging parents … moving this two week provision allows for greater visibility and greater access.”
The government has no business dictating what employers what benefits they must provide to employees. If this overreaching by our totalitarian communist state government continues, employers will leave the state for a state which believes the employer runs the company, not the state. After all California is $78 billion in debt because they have no idea what they are doing
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(1) comment
The government has no business dictating what employers what benefits they must provide to employees. If this overreaching by our totalitarian communist state government continues, employers will leave the state for a state which believes the employer runs the company, not the state. After all California is $78 billion in debt because they have no idea what they are doing
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.