Burlingame has approved nearly 40% of 3,257 units required for its 2023-31 state housing element, with the majority of approved units falling into the above-moderate income category, staff said during a City Council meeting March 16.
In a housing element process designed to alleviate the statewide crisis, the California Department of Housing and Development mandated that Burlingame approve building permits for 863 very low-income units, 497 low units, 529 moderate units and 1,368 above-moderate units by 2031.
Since 2022, the city has met 75% of its above-moderate quota, with 991 units approved. Its numbers are lower in other categories, with only 8% of moderate units approved and 14% of very low-income units approved, for example.
Burlingame should be proud of the work it has done in such a relatively small span of time, Community Development Director Neda Zayer told the council.
“We have achieved close to 40% of our [Regional Housing Needs Allocation] numbers, which is a high mark and a huge achievement for the city to have made that much progress in such a short amount of time,” she said.
In 2025, housing progress in the city revolved largely around construction, with 465 units built. Ninety-two units were entitled, and 72 were issued building permits.
The city’s progress on building new housing for its growing population began before the state required it, Mayor Michael Brownrigg said.
Recommended for you
“The work speaks for itself. We’re getting the job done. We were getting the job done before we were told to do it,” he said. “I think we all know what the right thing to do is.”
He did raise concerns around developments labeled as affordable housing raising rents to meet average median income standards. In a county where 80% of the average median income for a family of four is already $158,000, it makes sense to require affordable housing developers to cap increases, Brownrigg said.
“I think it is perfectly reasonable to hold a developer to whatever that rent is today at 80% AMI and not allow it to float up with AMI, and rather cap the increases over time,” he said.
Councilmember Peter Stevenson said he was in agreement with the idea, which may not mean fully freezing rent increases, but rather making them more reasonable given the rapid increases of average median income numbers.
“It’s a teaser rate — it gets people in but they can’t survive, because the increase is growing faster than their wage,” he said. “We need mechanisms to combat that.”
As the city continues to develop affordable housing, it might be prudent to consider hiring a housing specialist on staff, Councilmember Donna Colson said. She noted that she and other councilmembers often have to act as “housing specialists” for residents.
“Does there come a point in time [that] we need to seriously think of focusing someone full time?” she said. “I think we all feel like we’re kind of acting like housing specialists, and we’re not.”
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(0) comments
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.