My goodness, how people hate the Electoral College and the Second Amendment.
Maybe that’s why the Electoral College has been modified so many times since 1789. (BTW, the Pony Express didn’t exist until 1860). My favorite is the one proposed in the 1950s that would have instituted proportional distribution of electoral votes rather then the winner-takes-all system we have today. But, of course, the people, nasty little creatures that they are, didn’t pass it.
Regarding the Second Amendment, there was a good reason for it then, and it hasn’t changed much today. Maybe we just need tougher gun control laws, like they have in Chicago and New York, or Mexico for that matter.
Things would go so much smoother if people just did their homework.
Mr. Woods, thanks for your letter. I’d add that people should take a class or a refresher class (for those who didn’t do so well the first time around) on American Government, with a focus on the US Constitution and federalism.
Mr. Woods, your comment on gun control must be tongue-in-cheek. These cities have the strictest gun controls in the nation and also the highest murder rate. It seems counter intuitive. Clearly gun control is not having much of a positive effect.
Mr. Woods: Do you really believe that the Founding Fathers intended that assault weapons should be available for civilians, even young, immature ones? Remember what kind of weaponry was available at that time, and how long it took to reload?!
Dirk: OK, but do you really think that the 2nd. Amendment authors could foresee, and approve, of the kind of mass casualty assault weapons available today, and mainly meant for wars, not civilian use? Are you serious, or what? Are you OK with the mass killings we have had lately? What's the real, sensible reason for civilian availability of assault weapons like the AR-15? Any positive purpose to outweigh all the killings, especially of little innocent school children?
Jorg - maybe much to your surprise, but I agree with you. We have a major cultural issue here in this country that somehow needs to rectified. The mass shootings are abhorrent. I am just not sure whether prohibition of those arms is a solution. Sadly, most of the killers come from broken homes and have weasily parents. More people are killed with knives and handguns. We just seem to be so fascinated with weapons and that needs to change. If we were able through a concentrated effort to get a robust recycling program underway through early education, we should be able to get the next generation to view gun ownership as a Constitutional right but that it comes with responsibilities and accountability. I may be dreaming, unfortunately.
Dirk: No doubt that broken or shaky homes carry a lot, if not most, of the responsibility for misbehaving youth, including mass killers. Tracing back, perhaps abortion would have solved a lot of later problems, incl. lives. Nevertheless, modern assault weapons should be banned for civilians! They have no worthy mission that can offset the mass slaughtering we have seen, especially since the ban was lifted. Sure, innocent people are killed with knives, too, but not as quickly and massively as with assault weapons. I’m a knife attack survivor myself, and I realize that if the guy who attacked me had used a gun, I wouldn’t be here telling my story. Nor would I, if I had trusted a gun, instead of my right hook and instinctive reaction.
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(9) comments
Mr. Woods, thanks for your letter. I’d add that people should take a class or a refresher class (for those who didn’t do so well the first time around) on American Government, with a focus on the US Constitution and federalism.
Mr. Woods, your comment on gun control must be tongue-in-cheek. These cities have the strictest gun controls in the nation and also the highest murder rate. It seems counter intuitive. Clearly gun control is not having much of a positive effect.
Tongue in cheek? Of course! I'm sorry, I thought it would be obvious.
Mr. Woods: Do you really believe that the Founding Fathers intended that assault weapons should be available for civilians, even young, immature ones? Remember what kind of weaponry was available at that time, and how long it took to reload?!
Jorg - FYI, in those days, all weapons were assault weapons. The militias included children as young as 12 years old or even younger.
Dirk: OK, but do you really think that the 2nd. Amendment authors could foresee, and approve, of the kind of mass casualty assault weapons available today, and mainly meant for wars, not civilian use? Are you serious, or what? Are you OK with the mass killings we have had lately? What's the real, sensible reason for civilian availability of assault weapons like the AR-15? Any positive purpose to outweigh all the killings, especially of little innocent school children?
Jorg - maybe much to your surprise, but I agree with you. We have a major cultural issue here in this country that somehow needs to rectified. The mass shootings are abhorrent. I am just not sure whether prohibition of those arms is a solution. Sadly, most of the killers come from broken homes and have weasily parents. More people are killed with knives and handguns. We just seem to be so fascinated with weapons and that needs to change. If we were able through a concentrated effort to get a robust recycling program underway through early education, we should be able to get the next generation to view gun ownership as a Constitutional right but that it comes with responsibilities and accountability. I may be dreaming, unfortunately.
Of course they couldn't foresee AR-15s and the like. That's why we need to amend the 2nd amendment.
Dirk: No doubt that broken or shaky homes carry a lot, if not most, of the responsibility for misbehaving youth, including mass killers. Tracing back, perhaps abortion would have solved a lot of later problems, incl. lives. Nevertheless, modern assault weapons should be banned for civilians! They have no worthy mission that can offset the mass slaughtering we have seen, especially since the ban was lifted. Sure, innocent people are killed with knives, too, but not as quickly and massively as with assault weapons. I’m a knife attack survivor myself, and I realize that if the guy who attacked me had used a gun, I wouldn’t be here telling my story. Nor would I, if I had trusted a gun, instead of my right hook and instinctive reaction.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.