Editor,
There was merit for carpool lanes on Highway 101, which incentivized reducing traffic volume — and anyone could equally qualify for it.
Editor,
There was merit for carpool lanes on Highway 101, which incentivized reducing traffic volume — and anyone could equally qualify for it.
Why did Peninsula citizens want to remove those and instead install toll lanes so that rich people could zip around with less traffic and force the proletariat to stay stuck in traffic lanes? Is this truly what local citizens wanted? There was once some political narrative to bring equality between wealthy and poor people, but now rich-only toll lanes on Bay Area roads amplified the rich/poor dichotomy and amplified road rage.
FasTrak is laughing all the way to the bank and pocketing your hard-earned money. San Francisco and Silicon Valley used to be tourist attractions and business centers with many visitors from out of town. Now they get confused, frustrated and penalized on the roads. Is that what Bay Area citizens asked for? Bay Area traffic is known to be heavy. Science and mathematics suggest adding lanes to improve traffic, not remove lanes. Hello? I’ll bet that most locals, tourists and business visitors would prefer freedom to drive on the roads without this extra pointless cost and hassle. I suggest a referendum to ask the people if they prefer to remove this toll charging that serves no reasonable purpose, but instead increases traffic jams, incites road rage, harasses tourists, students and business visitors.
Chris Cavigioli
San Mateo
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.
Already a subscriber? Login Here
Sorry, an error occurred.
Already Subscribed!
Cancel anytime
Thank you .
Your account has been registered, and you are now logged in.
Check your email for details.
Submitting this form below will send a message to your email with a link to change your password.
An email message containing instructions on how to reset your password has been sent to the email address listed on your account.
No promotional rates found.
Secure & Encrypted
Thank you.
Your gift purchase was successful! Your purchase was successful, and you are now logged in.
| Rate: | |
| Begins: | |
| Transaction ID: |
A receipt was sent to your email.
(1) comment
Unfortunately, Chris, this penalty for the hoi polloi is to obtain funding for ever increasing pensions and benefits – somebody has to pay for them. Meanwhile, those that can’t afford to use the no-longer “free” lane will continue to use the “free” lanes and increase our area’s emissions via higher congestion. I wonder whether someone can do a study to gather numbers on the increase in commute times and number of road rage incident. Perhaps some numbers on other unintended consequences due to these toll lanes, such as more garbage on the side of the highway, more accidents, etc.?
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.