As both a former mayor of South San Francisco and longtime board member of the San Mateo County Transit District (SamTrans), I write in strong support of the recent guest perspective, “Protecting San Mateo County’s Interests in Regional Transit Funding,” and commend Assemblywoman Diane Papan for her leadership on this critical issue.
The Bay Area’s vision for seamless regional transit is a worthy one, but it must not come at the expense of fairness or local accountability. A proposed regional sales tax to prevent critical failures of public transportation systems is perhaps necessary but accountability for any dollars expended must be embedded in any levy.
Assemblywoman Papan’s proposals ensure stronger accountability measures — such as enforceable performance standards, local oversight and the ability to withhold funds if promises aren’t kept — are exactly what is needed to protect San Mateo County riders and taxpayers. These reforms do not oppose regionalism; rather, they ensure regionalism is equitable, responsible and rooted in real partnership.
As someone who has dedicated decades to improving local transit, I know firsthand that collaboration works best when each partner is respected.
Assemblywoman Papan’s thoughtful efforts reflect that understanding. I urge regional leaders to embrace her framework as a blueprint for building a more unified and just transit future.
The letter writer is the former mayor of South San Francisco and the former chair of the San Mateo County Transit District.
(1) comment
Ah, another respondent to the bat signal that has come out so another former San Mateo County transportation representative can submit a letter espousing the same talking points. Ms. Matsumoto, what happens if the authors of Senate Bill 63 tell San Mateo to pound sand, so to speak? What’s Plan B? Has Santa Clara county chosen to opt-in? I hear they’re pondering a sales tax increase for hospitals so they may not want to take the risk of adding another dedicated sales tax increase. Regardless, I’d recommend everyone vote NO on any tax measure until transportation agencies practice fiscal management.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.