Editor,
California’s conflict of interest rules for elected officials are far too weak, and it’s time for serious reform.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
Please log in, or sign up for a new account to continue reading.
Thank you for visiting the Daily Journal. We hope that you continue to enjoy our free content.
Please log in, or sign up for a new account and purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
Your current subscription does not provide access to this content.
Support the Peninsula’s only locally-owned newspaper. Subscribe!
Subscribing annually brings you big savings. We also offer monthly and weekly subscriptions.
Premium Subscription
As low as $8.25 per week
Premium Includes:
-- Access to the Daily Journal’s e-Edition: a digital replica of our daily newspaper including crossword puzzles, games, comics, classifieds and ads. You can download a digital replica of the Daily Journal for offline reading. You can also clip & download articles or images from the e-edition to share with others The most recent 90 issues are available at any given time.
-- Unlimited access to our award-winning online content
-- Commenting access on all stories as a valued member of the DJ community
-- NEW! Access to our online-only digital crossword puzzle. A new puzzle every day, seven days a week!
Rate | Price | Duration |
---|---|---|
1 Year | $99.00 | for 365 days |
1 Month | $20.00 | for 30 days |
1 Week | $8.25 | for 7 days |
Support the Peninsula’s only locally-owned newspaper. Subscribe!
Subscribing annually brings you big savings. We also offer monthly and weekly subscriptions.
DJ Basic Subscription
As low as $5 per month
Basic includes:
-- Unlimited access to our award-winning online content
-- Commenting access on all stories as a valued member of the DJ community
What you're missing -- Additional features available only with the Premium level:
-- Access to the Daily Journal’s e-Edition: a digital replica of our daily newspaper including crossword puzzles, games, comics, classifieds and ads. You can download a digital replica of the Daily Journal for offline reading. You can also clip & download articles or images from the e-edition to share with others The most recent 90 issues are available at any given time.
-- NEW! Access to our online-only digital crossword puzzle. A new puzzle every day, seven days a week!
All for as low as $5.00 per month.
Rate | Price | Duration |
---|---|---|
1 Year | $60.00 | for 365 days |
1 Month | $12.00 | for 30 days |
1 Week | $5.00 | for 7 days |
Rate | Price | Duration |
---|---|---|
Home Delivery - Year | $120.00 | for 365 days |
Mail Delivery - Year | $480.00 | for 365 days |
Editor,
California’s conflict of interest rules for elected officials are far too weak, and it’s time for serious reform.
State legislators, including senators and assemblymembers, are elected to serve the public full-time. Yet, many continue to hold outside jobs or consulting positions, often with corporations or industry groups that have a direct stake in the legislation they influence. Even more troubling, some receive lucrative stock options or consulting fees from entities that stand to benefit — or lose — from the policies these officials help craft.
This is not just poor ethics — it’s a direct threat to the integrity of our democracy. If a legislator sits on an environmental regulation committee, for example, they should be absolutely barred from any financial ties to companies in the environmental sector. The same goes for health care, technology, real estate and any other area where legislative action has a financial impact.
The temptation is simply too great. Allowing these side arrangements opens the door to self-dealing and corruption, while eroding public trust and doing measurable harm to the people of California. Public office is a public trust, not a platform for personal enrichment.
We need strong, enforceable rules that prohibit outside income and financial entanglements that create conflicts of interest. California voters deserve better.
Jim Lawrence
Foster City
The letter writer is the former mayor of Foster City.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.
Already a subscriber? Login Here
(3) comments
I fear CA will continue to become more corrupt under one party Democrat rule. The only this will change is a fiscal crisis which CA is well on it's way to.
The author has hit upon the root cause for the erosion of public trust in government. It began with Citizens United ruling that money equals speech. Now PACs determine who is elected, and billionaires, corporations and PAC hold the marionette strings of those elected. I'd like to see a published list of all donations and their original source, prior to voting for any candidate, and updated quarterly. The Brown Act needs to be updated for the 21st century into the Sunshine Act.
Thanks for your letter, Mr. Lawrence. Perhaps we need to open up avenues for citizens to sue lawmakers for their conflicts of interest. Perhaps, these conflicts of interest can be highlighted and published should any folks seek office or run for re-election. Maybe we can get the IRS involved to determine the money range of “temptation.” Or perhaps enterprising folks can highlight existing databases which show contributions from industry to candidates. Such as opensecrets.org or the Federal Election Commission. Ask AI by querying “database showing political contributions” or something to that effect.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.