Editor,
California’s conflict of interest rules for elected officials are far too weak, and it’s time for serious reform.
Editor,
California’s conflict of interest rules for elected officials are far too weak, and it’s time for serious reform.
State legislators, including senators and assemblymembers, are elected to serve the public full-time. Yet, many continue to hold outside jobs or consulting positions, often with corporations or industry groups that have a direct stake in the legislation they influence. Even more troubling, some receive lucrative stock options or consulting fees from entities that stand to benefit — or lose — from the policies these officials help craft.
This is not just poor ethics — it’s a direct threat to the integrity of our democracy. If a legislator sits on an environmental regulation committee, for example, they should be absolutely barred from any financial ties to companies in the environmental sector. The same goes for health care, technology, real estate and any other area where legislative action has a financial impact.
The temptation is simply too great. Allowing these side arrangements opens the door to self-dealing and corruption, while eroding public trust and doing measurable harm to the people of California. Public office is a public trust, not a platform for personal enrichment.
We need strong, enforceable rules that prohibit outside income and financial entanglements that create conflicts of interest. California voters deserve better.
Jim Lawrence
Foster City
The letter writer is the former mayor of Foster City.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.
Already a subscriber? Login Here
Sorry, an error occurred.
Already Subscribed!
Cancel anytime
Thank you .
Your account has been registered, and you are now logged in.
Check your email for details.
Submitting this form below will send a message to your email with a link to change your password.
An email message containing instructions on how to reset your password has been sent to the email address listed on your account.
No promotional rates found.
Secure & Encrypted
Thank you.
Your gift purchase was successful! Your purchase was successful, and you are now logged in.
| Rate: | |
| Begins: | |
| Transaction ID: |
A receipt was sent to your email.
(3) comments
I fear CA will continue to become more corrupt under one party Democrat rule. The only this will change is a fiscal crisis which CA is well on it's way to.
The author has hit upon the root cause for the erosion of public trust in government. It began with Citizens United ruling that money equals speech. Now PACs determine who is elected, and billionaires, corporations and PAC hold the marionette strings of those elected. I'd like to see a published list of all donations and their original source, prior to voting for any candidate, and updated quarterly. The Brown Act needs to be updated for the 21st century into the Sunshine Act.
Thanks for your letter, Mr. Lawrence. Perhaps we need to open up avenues for citizens to sue lawmakers for their conflicts of interest. Perhaps, these conflicts of interest can be highlighted and published should any folks seek office or run for re-election. Maybe we can get the IRS involved to determine the money range of “temptation.” Or perhaps enterprising folks can highlight existing databases which show contributions from industry to candidates. Such as opensecrets.org or the Federal Election Commission. Ask AI by querying “database showing political contributions” or something to that effect.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.