
An increasing number of longtime political leaders and activists are bemoaning the decline of what is sometimes called “the San Mateo County way.”
This is generally characterized by civility, cooperation and collegiality, even amid disagreements.
Of course, longtime outsiders, some of whom now are emerging in elective positions, would say these are just the delusions of the clubby insiders who long have dominated county politics and have kept themselves in power to the exclusion of people of color.
Certainly, those days, if not over, are being challenged. The newest and most notable example was Tuesday’s Board of Supervisors meeting at which supervisors Noelia Corzo and David Canepa launched personal attacks on Supervisor Ray Mueller. Canepa, in heated comments on Mueller's proposal to modify a ban on county cooperation with ICE, called it insulting and accused Mueller of making a subtle "dog whistle" appeal to anti-immigration and racist advocates. Corzo said Mueller's proposal "created and confusion and division and xenophobia in our community." Both of them called Mueller's proposal "irresponsible." These may have been the harshest comments ever uttered at the board dais and directed at a colleague.
All politics is local, the legendary Tip O’Neill used to say.
In San Mateo County, all politics is becoming personal.
Corzo’s argument for the ban leaned heavily on her own unpleasant and frightening experiences with ICE. Her perspective, she argued during her campaign for supervisor, has never been fully represented on the board. Her personal experience trumps all others.
We see this personal politics elsewhere. Canepa, in a blunder-filled interview with ABC-7’s Stephanie Sierra where she confronted him with data about criminal recidivism, said: “No. Look Stephanie, that’s not going to change my mind.” This comes impressively close to the assertion: “My mind is made up. Don’t confuse me with the facts.”
Similarly, San Mateo Mayor Amourence Lee’s recent moralistic manifesto of denial was all about her personal feelings.
It is a mark of inexperience when elected officials rely too heavily on how they feel as the main guide for making decisions.
Recommended for you
But it is how some portions of the political landscape are being reshaped, led by progressives.
All of which sets up a fascinating, and undoubtedly bitter, 2024 election cycle.
Some members of the old guard, as Lee conveniently labeled them, see a small group of progressives who are overreaching, legislatively and rhetorically. They expect a backlash against policies that may be suitable for San Francisco, but are out of step with San Mateo County. Or, what we are witnessing could be a generational change that relegates the old guard to nostalgia.
Against this cross-current, we can anticipate two of the most highly contested races for two seats on the board. Dave Pine, who represents District 1 (South San Francisco to Burlingame) is termed out at the end of next year; so is Warren Slocum, who represents District 4 (Redwood City to East Palo Alto). In both districts, at least eight people are being talked about as potential candidates. Disclaimer: The following is just the latest speculation. Inquiries among the possible candidates have not been made.
DISTRICT 1: Burlingame Councilmember Emily Beach announced her candidacy last week. She ran for Congress last year and finished fourth among seven candidates in the June primary. But she is thought to have run an impressive campaign and many of the established leaders in the county who backed ultimate winner Kevin Mullin now appear to be lining up behind Beach.
Millbrae Councilmember Gina Papan is an all-but-announced candidate. The expectation is that the race between these two will be bruising.
Also being mentioned (in no particular order): Millbrae councilmembers Anders Fung and Maurice Goodman, both Papan colleagues; Burlingame Councilmember Ricardo Ortiz, a Beach colleague; former San Bruno Councilmember Linda Mason; South San Francisco Councilmember James Coleman, who ran unsuccessfully for the state Assembly last year; and leading political strategist Irving Torres.
DISTRICT 4: Paul Bocanegra, community activist and juvenile justice and criminal justice reform advocate, is said to have begun the process of filing for this seat. Also being mentioned: East Palo Alto councilmembers Lisa Gauthier and Antonio Lopez; Redwood City Councilmember Alicia Aguirre and former councilmembers Giselle Hale and Ian Bain; and Menlo Park councilmembers Cecilia Taylor and Drew Combs.
LEST WE FORGET: The ever-voluble Canepa is also up for reelection to his third and final term on the board representing District 5 (Daly City to San Bruno). He is likely to run unopposed, given how hard he works his district and to maintain a high profile.
OTHER RACES: There are rumors that Rudy Espinoza Murray, Corzo’s chief of staff, is considering running for the Redwood City Council, challenging first-term incumbent Lisette Espinoza-Garnica. … You can bet there will be no recall election in San Mateo, but a dedicated group is looking for someone to run against Lee when she is up for reelection next year.
Mark Simon is a veteran journalist, whose career included 15 years as an executive at SamTrans and Caltrain. He can be reached at marksimon@smdailyjournal.com.
Note to readers: This column has been changed to more accurately reflect the comments of David Canepa and Noelia Corzo.
(13) comments
Maybe we saw two different meetings - Supervisor Corzo at no point personally attacked Supervisor Mueller - characterizing it as such is absolutely false. Very disappointed. Anyone can see for themselves in the county's meeting recording: https://sanmateocounty.granicus.com/player/clip/1189?view_id=1&redirect=true&h=f8bd9c06ab47379b4e39a03710414adb You can fast track to her comments that begin at 3:22:30.
The only people that have filed to run for County Supervisor are; District 1 Gina Papan & Emily Beach, District 4 Paul Boganegra & Lisa Gauthier, and District 5 David Canapea. Boganera put in $4,000 of his own money and Canepa has a balance of $48,000. The others have not raised any money prior to Jan 01, 2023, but they can raise and spend money now.
Who donated to Canepa?
See https://public.netfile.com/pub2/?AID=mat, San Mateo County Public Portal for Campaign Finance Disclosure.
These politicians are infantilely solipsistic - and its really scary to see. Folks of this ilk are the definition of "if you give a rat a cookie..." They are the kind of people that could have been Bolsheviks - and very well may be in the future at the rate this country is going. These politicians arbitrarily squawking "racism and xenophobia" are some of the most hateful people on the planet. They openly show they dont care equally about the total collective population of San Mateo County and have no shame about it.
Mark, you are betting there will be no recall - why? People are clamoring to sign, Lee is making signatures very easy to get!
Thanks, Mr. Simon, for describing San Mateo “unity” in action. Unity for them has been redefined to consist of “me, me, me” more than “us.” Voters get the government they deserve. Let’s hope voters note the track records of these folks and whether they get more rabid or more reasonable. Based on current statistics, many are getting more rabid and if you re-elect them, count on more of the same. Screenwriters, based on San Mateo’s recent past, do we have basis for a TV series? Now, which actors/actresses, if you had your druthers, would you choose to play the leads?
Sup.Corzo’s remarks were reasoned and respectfully delivered. Are you mistaking clarity and directness for an attack?
She accused a colleague of being a racist. No matter the reasonableness of one’s argument, that is a personal attack that goes beyond an honest exchange of views.
I’d respectfully disagree. If someone is being racist and propagating xenophobic rhetoric, especially someone in power, they should be called out and held accountable.
Mark, I'm surprised that you're doubling down on this falsehood - she never even said the word racist in any of her remarks. I just reviewed every single word she said in the recording. https://sanmateocounty.granicus.com/player/clip/1189?view_id=1&redirect=true&h=f8bd9c06ab47379b4e39a03710414adb here's a link for you to watch.
Rudy I agree, she did not directly Call Supervisor Mueller a racist. But there were some indirect insinuations throughout the whole dialogue that Supervisor Mueller's legitimate arguments fully grounded on his perspective as a lawyer, conflated with white supremacist views and therefore made him a racist. The dog whistling accusation was a direct attempt at saying that and absolutely inappropriate. Those insinuations either direct or indirect, were inappropriate and activated white supremacists, whom we all know, are desperately looking for a home now.
The calling Mueller to defend his own truth (and that of much of the public) in that manner was disrespectful too.
I agree, these accusations did not come directly from Corzo. I expect in the future a stronger denunciation of those types of indirect insinuations. We have seen in the past especially in national politics, respected figures call out their supporters on wrong rhetoric and the public wants to see that and most importantly we want to know that different views and healthy debate which is paramount in good governance and a fiduciary duty of the board of supervisors is not shut out.
"Her personal experience trumps all others" did Ms Corzo explain what led to her personal experience? Was it something that she initiated requiring ICE to get involved? Context please!
I provide the context in the prior sentence. And you can read yesterday’s front page story in which she describes it in detail.
Mark - in your comment and hers in yesterday's report she contradicts herself. She was a victim of crimes by an ostensibly illegal immigrant. Why would she want to protect and shield them from deportation? Sounds masochistic to me. And, just because she had that experience does that justify burdening the rest of us in the County with these criminal elements. The world is upside down and I stand by my opinion. Dereliction of duty and it alludes to the Stockholm syndrome. Unfortunately, we are stuck with her for 4 years.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.