From left, Burlingame Superintendent Marla Silversmith and trustees Dan DeVoy, Doug Brown and Katie Jay hear a presentation from students advocating for the return of chocolate milk.
Burlingame Intermediate School students Henry Mudd, left, and Soaham Sinha gave a presentation advocating for the return of chocolate milk at lunchtime to the districtās Board of Trustees, securing a pilot program through the end of the school year.
Middle schoolers in Burlingame are looking to bring back the beloved option of chocolate milk during lunchtime, an effort led by two Burlingame Intermediate School students who believe in its nutritional benefits and ability to increase student satisfaction.Ā
Seventh grader Soaham Sinhaās campaign for class president said he would try to bring chocolate milk back to students after it was discontinued more than a year ago. Now, he and eighth grade President Henry Mudd have made good on that promise, gathering data, presenting it to the school board, and securing a pilot program for chocolate milk on campus twice a week.
āItās amazing to make an impact in your community,ā Sinha said.Ā
In a chocolatey brown organized presentation, the two students told district trustees and Superintendent Marla Silversmith at their meeting April 15, to bring back chocolate milk because of its nutritional benefits, increased student satisfaction and promotion of healthy habits.Ā
āChocolate milk provides essential vitamins and minerals that kids currently donāt get because most of them donāt drink milk,ā their presentation read. āStudents enjoy chocolate milk, leading to happier meal times.āĀ
The students conducted a Google survey of 822 students, finding that while 745% currently do not drink the regular milk offered, 68% did drink chocolate milk when it was previously offered. If the option was brought back, students would more likely receive nutrients in milk, flavored or unflavored, than they are currently, Sinha and Mudd argued.Ā
āThese graphs show a 57.5% increase in the amount of students at BIS who would be drinking milk, flavored or unflavored,ā Sinha said. āThis means that students would want to drink milk so getting chocolate milk back at our school would truly benefit us.āĀ
Chocolate milk is currently allowed in California schools if they meet certain criteria. Flavored milk must be fat free or low fat, and not exceed the limit of no more than 10 grams of added sugars per 8 fluid ounces.Ā
The students also researched the schoolās food provider, Sodexo, and found its chocolate milk option is within the added sugar limits, and wouldnāt cost any more money than already is being spent.Ā
Chocolate milk is a good source of nutrients, Sinha and Mudd argued, including protein, potassium, calcium and Vitamin D, Sinha and Mudd argued. Additionally, the increase in consuming nutrients found in milk could prevent osteoporosis, they said.Ā
Recommended for you
āOsteoporosis is caused by things like a lack of milk,ā Sinha said. āTeaching kids to start drinking milk regularly at this age can prevent problems like that.āĀ
From left, Burlingame Superintendent Marla Silversmith and trustees Dan DeVoy, Doug Brown and Katie Jay hear a presentation from students advocating for the return of chocolate milk.
Arianna Cunha/Daily Journal
Presenting in front of the board was slightly nerve wracking, Sinha and Mudd said, but they believed in their cause.Ā
āAs it started to go on, I got used to it and it was just like presenting to teachers,ā Mudd said.Ā
Public commenter Bryant McLaughlin shared his desire for alternative nutritional drinks to be offered, such as a kefir kale blueberry banana smoothie, rather than chocolate milk, but appreciated the studentsā efforts to organize such a presentation.Ā
The Burlingame School District Board of Trustees approved a pilot program that will offer a chocolate milk option at lunchtime two days a week for the remainder of the school year at Burlingame Intermediate School only.Ā
Mudd and Sinha will be responsible for gathering data on its popularity, how students balance their meals, and see if students are still eating their meals. They will also conduct a parent survey to gather their thoughts on the option returning.Ā Ā
āSomething people are worried about, especially with the elementary schools that the kids just get the lunch for the chocolate milk and then they just throw out the lunch, which is why we only got it back for the middle school because weāre hoping that theyāre mature enough now to understand that,ā Sinha said.Ā
The pair will return to the board at its meeting June 17, to report their findings.Ā
āIt was pretty exciting,ā Mudd said. āIāve always heard people saying āyou can do anythingā but we really proven that, even though itās a small thing.ā
10 gr added sugar per 8 oz fluid is cause of concern.
Since milk and chocolate are already full of sugar, that value needs to be lower. Otherwise it basically takes away any perceived benefits the vitamins or calcium is supposed to be bringing.
More sugar means kids stay hungry. The fat on the other hand isn't that concerning as it is filling and reduces hunger.
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means youāre helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(2) comments
Let's ask RFK Jr about his recommendation. Since when are we asking kids, who have a certain motive, for nutritional expertise.
10 gr added sugar per 8 oz fluid is cause of concern.
Since milk and chocolate are already full of sugar, that value needs to be lower. Otherwise it basically takes away any perceived benefits the vitamins or calcium is supposed to be bringing.
More sugar means kids stay hungry. The fat on the other hand isn't that concerning as it is filling and reduces hunger.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.