Scott Wiener

Scott Wiener

A controversial state Senate bill that aimed to increase housing near public transit throughout the state will not move forward this year after it failed to get out of committee Tuesday.

SB 827, sponsored by Sen. Scott Wiener, D-San Francisco, failed to get out of the senate’s Transportation and Housing Committee.

“While I’m disappointed that Senate Bill 827 won’t be moving forward this year, I’m heartened by the conversation it has started, both with those who support the bill and with critics of the bill,” Wiener said in a statement.

The bill would have provided “an incentive for housing developers to build near transit by exempting” them “from certain low-density requirements including maximum controls on residential density, maximum controls on floor-area ratio,” minimum parking requirements and maximum building heights, according to an analysis of the bill.

Six senators voted against it, four voted in favor and three abstained.

Early this month and before the bill was amended April 9, opponents said it would take away power from local jurisdictions and communities by preventing them from participating in decisions regarding land use, zoning livability and sustainability while applying a one-size-fits-all strategy to the state’s housing shortage.

Opponents rallied April 3 in San Francisco to demand that San Francisco supervisors take a stance against it.

“The passion we have seen around this bill is driven by what we are all feeling-that California’s housing costs are unsustainable and our housing policies aren’t working,” Wiener said.

“California needs to get at the heart of our housing shortage, not just work around the edges, or we will become a hollowed out state with no middle class,” Wiener added.

Laura Foote Clark, executive direction of YIMBY Action, which supported the bill, said her group was disappointed by the vote, but added, “We are hopeful that this is going to come back in another forum in the near future.”

Wiener did not say he thought the bill would fail rather he suspected it might take more than a year for the legislation to pass. Wiener compared the bill to legislation proposed by Gov. Jerry Brown in 2016 that aimed to streamline housing approvals.

That proposal paved the way for the success of Senate Bill 35, which Wiener also sponsored, and which will streamline housing approvals.

Clark said of SB827, “A version of this bill will pass.”

Wiener said in the coming months he will be working to create a proposal for next year.

Fifteen bills aimed at alleviating the state’s housing crisis were signed into law by Brown in September.

The bills are meant to, among other things, reduce regulations, strengthen housing laws, boost construction and increase housing supply.

Recommended for you

(2) comments

Seasoned Observer

Despite good intentions this was a very bad public policy idea from the get go. Allowing the State to usurp local land use authority to this degree would have opened the door to nothing but problems down the road.

If Mr. Weiner wanted the State to start micromanaging local land use why didn't he introduce legislation restricting the boatloads of commercial development that cities are approving? I think we all know why.

SMC citizen

Yes In Their Back Yards, save the people, build more projects

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.

Thank you for visiting the Daily Journal.

Please purchase an Enhanced Subscription to continue reading. To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.

We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.

A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!