A controversial bike lane project that will get rid of one lane of traffic on a major San Mateo road is causing frustration among nearby residents, though some cyclists say the move is critical for improving bike infrastructure and safety.
The city plans to upgrade the bike lanes along Delaware Street between 19th Avenue and Pacific Boulevard. Both northbound and southbound lanes will receive more protected bike lanes with better delineation, but South Delaware Street will go from two lanes of traffic down to one lane from Bermuda Drive to Saratoga Drive, with dedicated turn lanes opening up after Saratoga Drive.
The project, estimated to cost $3.6 million — half from grants and half from local funds — has angered several residents of nearby complexes along Delaware Street, including Ironwood. Roberta Drake, president of the Ironwood Board of Directors, said the residents weren’t contacted or informed of the plans.
She added that, currently, the second southbound lane is critical for traffic flow, as the far right lane is often blocked due to cars waiting on cyclists and pedestrians so they can turn into their complexes or truck deliveries that take up the whole lane.
“There are days where I can’t get out of my complex because of congestion. I’m afraid it will be like that all the time,” Drake said. “When a car turns into the driveway, they sometimes wait for bikers or pedestrians, and you hear people honking all day … but they have another lane to go into and go around it. If they take this out, that won’t exist, and every single car getting off the freeway will have to wait.”
Phil King, however, lives in the Beresford neighborhood and frequently rides his bike to take his daughter to school at College Park Elementary School. He said the improvements will make his commute much safer.
“It’s very difficult to get on to Delaware from 28th or 25th [avenues] without being overwhelmed by cars during the busy part of the day,” King said. “Riding along Delaware, and especially north, you’re riding next to parked cars on one side and relatively busy, high-speed road. I’m always really worried about getting doored, but I really like the design of having the bike lane close to the curb, so there is a buffer.”
King used to live in the Ironwood complex for years and said he understands how frustrating it could be to get in and out of the driveways sometimes. But he said having to cross one lane of traffic southbound, rather than two, is actually easier and the traffic buildup near the State Route 92 entrance is mostly northbound.
Recommended for you
“You do get backups, but the northbound lanes are busier, because people are going to the freeway during commute hours,” he said. “I think it will be far easier to leave the driveway by crossing one lane of traffic than two, so long as they get the striping right.”
He added that the street is an arterial road, not just for cars but for cyclists and pedestrians as well.
The project highlights a broader issue with which the city is contending — improving bike lane infrastructure while balancing the needs of nearby residents who park and drive their cars in the area. Earlier this year, the City Council voted to start the process of removing bike lanes in the North Central neighborhood — funded by a $1.5 million federal grant that the city will probably have to re-pay in part — after residents complained about the subsequent loss of parking spaces and voicing concern their input wasn’t included prior to its implementation.
Drake said she feels similarly that the city didn’t seem to take neighboring residents’ insights into account when designing the Delaware Street project.
“They put fliers out, they never sent us any notice,” she said. “I resent that we weren’t included.”
City staff said the first outreach phase began last year which included pop-up events and meetings with schools. The second phase began last week which included community meetings and mailing about 4,000 notices. Construction is anticipated to begin this summer.
Here we go again…hasn’t San Mateo learned anything in regards to the debacle in North Central on bike lanes? But hey, at least union workers get to cash in. Twice. Once when installing bike lanes and then again when they remove them. As in North Central.
Don't blame "cyclists" for this one. Blame the speeders and reckless drivers.
This might be sold as a bicycle project, but looking at the plans, I don't think so. The street looks like there would be enough space to allow multiple car lanes 9-10ft wide. There were 5ft bike lanes before, adding 2ft to make them buffered or separated wouldn't need the take-down of a car lane. The main intention of this project is to take away the driving lane to reduce speeding and improve safety and traffic flow for drivers.
This is basically a road diet, a typical "traffic calming" project. BUT by naming it a Safe-Routes-To-School project they can use Measure A and W bicycle funding to pay for it.
The bike lanes themselves would only cost 5-figures not 7 like staff pretends here.
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(3) comments
Here we go again…hasn’t San Mateo learned anything in regards to the debacle in North Central on bike lanes? But hey, at least union workers get to cash in. Twice. Once when installing bike lanes and then again when they remove them. As in North Central.
There is too much car traffic. Thus, we won't/can't do anything to help people get around without a car. Interesting logic.
Don't blame "cyclists" for this one. Blame the speeders and reckless drivers.
This might be sold as a bicycle project, but looking at the plans, I don't think so. The street looks like there would be enough space to allow multiple car lanes 9-10ft wide. There were 5ft bike lanes before, adding 2ft to make them buffered or separated wouldn't need the take-down of a car lane. The main intention of this project is to take away the driving lane to reduce speeding and improve safety and traffic flow for drivers.
This is basically a road diet, a typical "traffic calming" project. BUT by naming it a Safe-Routes-To-School project they can use Measure A and W bicycle funding to pay for it.
The bike lanes themselves would only cost 5-figures not 7 like staff pretends here.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.