Editor,
Current Sheriff Carlos Bolanos should be reelected as San Mateo County sheriff hands down. Not only is he experienced, but he is a proven leader and responds to the public and doesn’t hide information.
Editor,
Current Sheriff Carlos Bolanos should be reelected as San Mateo County sheriff hands down. Not only is he experienced, but he is a proven leader and responds to the public and doesn’t hide information.
Case in point regarding responsiveness was his policy change regarding ICE. Candidly, I’m a supporter of ICE but Sheriff Bolanos showed he is responsive to the public by reversing his cooperation with ICE when the public criticized his cooperation with them. I don’t agree with his decision but I have to admire his flexibility in listening to the public and making the change.
Regarding his opponent, Christina Corpus, in a recent interview with another publication she didn’t offer any compelling reason why voters should elect her sheriff. Except that she would have an “open door” and that people would know “who their sheriff was.” In answer to that, I don’t personally know Sheriff Bolanos, but I’ve known who he is through his positive and transparent work in San Mateo County as sheriff. I didn’t know who Corpus was at all until she threw her hat into the ring.
Vote Carlos Bolanos for sheriff.
Bob Wackerman
San Mateo
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.
Already a subscriber? Login Here
Sorry, an error occurred.
Already Subscribed!
Cancel anytime
Thank you .
Your account has been registered, and you are now logged in.
Check your email for details.
Submitting this form below will send a message to your email with a link to change your password.
An email message containing instructions on how to reset your password has been sent to the email address listed on your account.
No promotional rates found.
Secure & Encrypted
Thank you.
Your gift purchase was successful! Your purchase was successful, and you are now logged in.
| Rate: | |
| Begins: | |
| Transaction ID: |
A receipt was sent to your email.
(7) comments
Having met and talked with Sheriff Bolanos, I agree completely with your letter .
"in a recent interview with another publication she didn’t offer any compelling reason why voters should elect her sheriff." It would have been helpful if the Palo Alto Post had extended an invitation to Captain Corpus for an interview. Without an interview, there is no way to know if her positions are compelling.
Nope.
Bolanos has been sheriff since 2016, and he only stopped turning people over to ICE in the last few months of an election year. Of the 9 Bay Area counties, San Mateo county accounted for 74% of the prisoner transfers to ICE. He did not change the policy until 3 of the 5 Supervisors spoke in favor of supporting the people speaking in favor of changing the policy. The policy was a drain on the county's resources and a threat to public safety, yet Bolanos kept doing it for most of his 6 years in office. When the LA Sheriff Alex Villanueva ended cooperation with ICE in 2019, he said it "endangers the safety of the public. People do not report being victimized for fear of it leading to deportation if not of themselves, a loved one.”
And yet, Sheriff Bolanos receives high ratings for keeping San Mateo County safe. I vote to keep San Mateo County safe for all residents. BTW, under Villanueva, hasn't their homicide rate increased over 90% since 2019, with auto thefts up over 60% in the same period? I'm not sure Villanueva is a good example of ending cooperation with ICE. If anything, we should look at LA's results of ending cooperation with ICE and resume the previous policy here in SMC.
All data show that there is a much lower rate of crime among undocumented immigrants than US citizens. For somewhat obvious reasons, if you care to think about it. There are smarter ways to deal with immigration issues.
The Bolanos solution was a threat to public safety, and I worry he will go back to his old policy once the election ends.
Westy, I doubt there is a much lower rate of crime among undocumented immigrants since they are all breaking the law. Perhaps a lower rate of crime reporting, but definitely not a lower rate of crime. I agree there are smarter ways to deal with immigration issues but ignoring all immigration issues and allowing unchecked immigration isn’t a smarter way or any way at all, especially if undocumented immigrants who have committed offenses are allowed to remain in country. We already have enough problems with documented folks committing offenses. Thanks to Bolanos, we’re much safer in San Mateo County than surrounding counties.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.