Editor,
I recently received yet another glossy, multicolored, multifold “No on Y” pamphlet from real estate developers who are not interested in what is best for the quality of life and character of San Mateo.
Recommended for you
Post a comment as Guest
Report
Watch this discussion. Stop watching this discussion.
Thank you for visiting the Daily Journal.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
Want to join the discussion?
Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.
Already a subscriber? Login Here
Latest News
- Trump threatens to destroy Iranian 'civilization' if a deal isn't reached
- Judge refuses to block sending abortion pill by mail for now, but says FDA must finish review
- World marathon championships to break away from track meet starting in 2030
- AP Entertainment SummaryBrief at 5:29 p.m. EDT
- Kansas' Bidunga, Wake Forest's Harris, Saint Mary's Murauskas among players entering men's portal
- Harry Kane leads Bayern to 2-1 win over Real Madrid in 1st leg of Champions League quarterfinals
- Macklin Celebrini keeps the Sharks in the playoff hunt with 107-point season
- Former Migos rapper Offset is stable after being shot outside a Florida casino, spokesperson says
Trending Stories
Articles
- Caltrain warns of system closure: After BART’s tentative plan to close 15 stations without more funding, Caltrain projects starker picture
- Burlingame celebrates opening of new town square
- A 4.6 earthquake in Boulder Creek in the Santa Cruz Mountains awakes Bay residents with shaking homes for miles
- Russian ship carrying 730,000 barrels of oil arrives in Cuba, the first such shipment following the US energy blockade
- San Mateo family hospitalized after struck by pickup truck at the North Delaware Street and State Street intersection over the weekend
- San Mateo County supervisors to discuss purchasing Burlingame property for treatment facility
- San Mateo mansion breaks record with $12.5M listing: Italian Renaissance-style home listed on market for first time in its 104-year history
- NorCal Crew comes back from San Diego Crew Classic regatta with two titles — the Men's Youth 8+ and the adaptive Men's Youth PR3 crowns
- Disagreement with recent letter
- San Mateo County Board of Supervisors considers sales tax increase for local funding
Images
Videos
Commented
- Is Iran the new Iraq? (14)
- Public transit faces a financial cliff: Support the November ballot measure (13)
- Sen. Josh Becker bill targets utility execs (9)
- Wrongful death lawsuit alleges city of Burlingame, driver, 11-year-old e-bike rider and parents at fault (9)
- ‘We’re heartbroken, we’re devastated’: Leaders in San Mateo County react to allegations that César Chavez sexually abused girls (9)
- Of cabbages and kings (8)
- San Mateo County Board of Supervisors freezes Measure K discretionary funds: Certain nonprofit program funding allocations to cease in Fiscal Year 2027-28 (8)
- Gas prices, national parks and your IRA (8)
- San Mateo family hospitalized after struck by pickup truck at the North Delaware Street and State Street intersection over the weekend (8)
- San Mateo Drive apartments approved, pushing forward city’s active pipeline post-Measure T (8)
- San Mateo County Board of Supervisors scopes e-bike ordinance (8)
- Disappointed in legislation (7)
- Reasons for war misunderstood by many (7)
- Who puts up the Highway 101 political banners? (7)
- Tensions over treatment facility: San Mateo residents say facility would ruin neighborhood, while recovery advocates say opposition continues harmful stereotypes (7)
- Cherrypicking (7)
- The problem with VLF, explained for the rest of us (6)
- Buyers beware: Not all e-bikes are e-bikes (6)
- Cost of Trump administration (6)
- Caltrain warns of system closure: After BART’s tentative plan to close 15 stations without more funding, Caltrain projects starker picture (6)
- Daily Journal Girls’ Basketball Player of the Year: Mitty’s McKenna Woliczko (5)
- The SAVE America Act (5)
- The cosmic calculator (5)
- How the war will end (4)
- David Canepa and Jim Irizarry compete for San Mateo County assessor-county clerk-recorder position (4)
- Early stage of express lane project extended (4)
- The truth about Iran (4)
- Express lane data confirms violation concerns (4)
- Robert Mueller (4)
- Why I oppose Horizon’s proposed detox center (4)
- The promise of America (4)
- The perils of forcing state workers to commute (4)
- Flawed planning process in San Mateo (3)
- Remember the promise of America (3)
- Restoring local funding owed to San Mateo County (3)
- A billion here, a billion there (3)
- The record isn’t complete without you (3)
- San Mateo County supervisors to discuss purchasing Burlingame property for treatment facility (3)
- San Mateo Union High School District Board of Trustees bans cellphones: District restricts access to devices during entire school day (3)
- California has 40,000 affordable housing units ready to break ground. One setback is holding them up (3)
- Getting work done: Why humility still wins (3)
- Why is pollution in east South City so bad? (3)
- Harris or Trump? (3)
- Caltrain fear campaign (3)
- Rent control repeal in works: Half Moon Bay also votes to remove the city’s rental registry program (3)
- Chelsea Bonini and Héctor Camacho in race for San Mateo County superintendent of schools (3)
- Sen. Becker’s folly (3)
- Burlingame celebrates opening of new town square (3)
- The end of the good life in San Mateo (3)
- The flyover county (3)
- Better to deal with Iran now (3)
- New study shows Highway 101 express lanes have improved but some transit experts wary (3)
- San Mateo pushes electric again (3)
- Consider Trump’s actions (3)
- All rise (3)
- Oh boy (3)
- Camacho will show up (2)
- Anti-tank barriers (2)
- New developments in San Mateo (2)
- Who will benefit from tariffs? (2)
- California renames César Chavez Day following sexual abuse allegations (2)
- Gold’s historic run and why you should care (2)
- San Mateo County leaders yank support for treatment center at 101 N. El Camino Real at the edge of the Baywood neighborhood (2)
- San Mateo mansion breaks record with $12.5M listing: Italian Renaissance-style home listed on market for first time in its 104-year history (2)
- Reasons for war misunderstood by many (2)
- New details on potential 101/92 connector project in San Mateo (2)
- What is the promise of America? (2)
- Make your voices heard March 24 (2)
- Police hear from community: Contract negotiations with city of San Bruno at impasse (2)
- Downtown San Mateo in war zone (2)
- Phone free schools (2)
- Location the determining factor for treatment center (2)
- Treatment yes, location yes (2)
- Transgender women athletes banned from female Olympic events by new IOC policy (2)
- Why e-micromobility ordinance is needed (2)
- Iran, and nuclear bombs (2)
- Leaving California (2)
- Rubio pushes postwar plan for Strait of Hormuz after meeting G7 allies skeptical about Iran strategy (2)
- Are nuclear weapons a local issue? (2)
- Wrong neighborhood for Stanford expansion (2)
- San Carlos faces a hefty requirement to build housing by 2031 (2)
- Visible lack of unity (2)
- Lawmakers condemn ICE arrest at San Francisco International Airport: Detainment unrelated to deployments by federal agents to help the TSA (2)
- Editorial: Better engagement needed for treatment center proposal (2)
- California’s budget bleeds red ink with added pressure to cover Donald Trump’s cuts (2)
- The lessons I have learned on my school trip (2)
- Housing for San Mateo Safeway site (2)
- Who represents District 1? (2)
- Redwood City affirms welcoming values: Special meeting to be held Thursday to affirm protections for residents, restriction of third parties using city-owned land (2)
- College protesters demand end to war on Iran (2)
- Thousands take aim at Trump policies in ‘No Kings’ protests around Bay Area (2)
- San Mateo clarifies campaign sign policies: Policy is solidified after high number of complaints during last election cycle (2)
- Legitimate questions about safety, oversight and suitability (2)
- San Mateo County Board of Supervisors considers sales tax increase for local funding (2)
- Roster for San Mateo County’s June ballot closed (1)
- Our children deserve a phone-free school day (1)
- Fun for the family (1)
- Students advocating for lenient cellphone policy in San Mateo Union High School District (1)
Latest e-Edition
- To view our latest e-Edition click the image on the left.
(8) comments
The backers of Measure R are the worst of the worst when it comes to the city of San Mateo. Anyone pushing Measure R should be challenged in their views and questioned to their loyalty to the city of San Mateo and the citizens who are proud to call her home. If you live in San Mateo; Yes on Y, No on R. If you live outside the city of San Mateo, who cares what you think
The San Mateo GOP endorsement page says Yes on Y and No on R. It litteraly is correct that's vote for Y is a Vote for Trump ideology.
That is a complete lie. Measure Y is a citizens initiative. You and the HLC members are spreading lies and dividing our community.
It is litteraly on the San Mateo County GOP website. 😂😂😂 SMRG doesn't even comprehend who is pulling the puppet strings.
The San Mateo County Democratic Party opposes Measure Y, and the San Mateo County Republican Party (who have been throwing Trump rallies all through the county recently) support Measure Y. All of that is factual information. Sorry if that's inconvenient for your narrative.
So you will stop using Uber, Lyft, Doordash, the myriad of other delivery services, and gig workers in general because the Republicans endorse Prop 22?
What is your point or do you have one?
I don't use rideshare, Thomas, and for the record, I strongly oppose Prop 22.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.