Editor,
San Mateo doesn’t need to fight new neighbors — it needs to encourage driving alternatives.
Editor,
San Mateo doesn’t need to fight new neighbors — it needs to encourage driving alternatives.
For those of us who plan to live here for the long haul, it’s clear that the alternative to growth is not preservation, but decline. Rising housing costs, shrinking school enrollment and aging infrastructure all point to a city that is resisting change rather than preparing for the future.
But growth can — and should — look different from the past. My household regularly walks, bikes, scoots and rides SamTrans/Caltrain.
We know that when streets feel safe and pleasant, people choose to leave the car at home. If San Mateo wants to grow responsibly, it must invest in the relatively cheap safety improvements that make alternatives to driving feel not just possible, but preferable.
More housing near transit. Safer crosswalks. Bike lanes that aren’t just paint. Frequent buses that are given priority and go where people need to go. These are the building blocks of a city that grows smarter — not just bigger.
Let’s welcome more neighbors and fewer cars. Growth done right doesn’t mean more traffic — it means more students walking to school, seniors biking to the park or commuters catching the train/bus to work. That’s the future San Mateo deserves.
Max Mautner
San Mateo
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.
Already a subscriber? Login Here
Sorry, an error occurred.
Already Subscribed!
Cancel anytime
Thank you .
Your account has been registered, and you are now logged in.
Check your email for details.
Submitting this form below will send a message to your email with a link to change your password.
An email message containing instructions on how to reset your password has been sent to the email address listed on your account.
No promotional rates found.
Secure & Encrypted
Thank you.
Your gift purchase was successful! Your purchase was successful, and you are now logged in.
| Rate: | |
| Begins: | |
| Transaction ID: |
A receipt was sent to your email.
(5) comments
An imaginary and unrealistic dream to revert backwards in time where cars no longer exist so that a few bikers can enjoy the open roads all to themselves. And who feeds the people when all ground transport comes to a halt?
Unfortunately, Mr. Mautner, not many people live where they work and as such, bike lanes will only serve a small (perhaps very small, according to other contributors) portion of the population. Recreational bike riders can always find alternatives to enjoy the outdoors. The future San Mateo deserves is for folks to get where they need, most efficiently, until they’re able to find a place to live near where they work. That’s the future San Mateo deserves more.
TBot, It's America and people can choose where they work and where they live. And if people like other people with cars then there are plenty of congested roads and bridges and they can duel each other for the same parking spots. Good for them.
But what about people who don't like being exposed to reckless, drunk, speeding, distracted, road raged, depressed drivers?
How can they opt out of the automotive Utopia?
eGerd – TBot here. Those folks can create a bicycle Utopia by taxing themselves to pay for their community and infrastructure dedicated to bicycling. In their master plan, don’t forget they’ll need to plan nearby grocery stores and schools and shops and everything else they may need. But… how will shops receive their inventory? How will streets rid themselves of garbage? How will the multitude of vehicle drivers deliver “stuff”?
People walking and riding have paid for our trails and roads for the last 6,000 years and more. Even today that payment is already taken care off. Voters keep approving measures that would be paying for all (e.g. Measure A/W) bicycle infrastructure and all of SamTrans ... if politicians like Rico E. Medina, David Canepa, Jeff Gee, Emily Beach, Diane Papan wouldn't keep moving that funding away from bikes and buses towards their favorite projects (mostly real estate and cars of course). So you could start giving back the money we spend on those "Lexus Lanes" of yours to get quicker to Ikea.
But you make a good point about all the necessary 'Residential Service Parking" that is required on any city street on a regular basis: mail, package, food delivery, garbage, contractors, pg&e, nannies, gardeners, what should they do?
And the solution is simple. Get rid of ALL Private Car Storage and use that empty canvas to create livable streets or 'Complete Streets' as Republican Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger intendent.
Every street is 28-36 feet wide, some even 44 and wider. Cars on average will not exceed 7ft, truck won't exceed 8.5ft. Any solid transportation engineer in Europe can accommodate all kinds of solutions on this canvas, only American engineers have no idea what they are doing. They are still living in the dark ages of "speed humps" and "Stop signs" here.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.