So much of our lives are spent trying to achieve a state of equilibrium. As someone with congenital hearing loss who wears hearing aids in both ears, I also experience occasional bouts of vertigo that make me acutely aware of the necessity of balance. It is indispensable.
Kevin Mullin
As America enters into its next chapter, I can’t help but wonder what our founders would be thinking if they were around today. When they created our Constitution, they focused on setting up an intentional system of checks and balances to ensure we weren’t unduly controlled by one branch of government.
We’re entering into a period of imbalance in federal government. One party controls the presidency, the Senate and, narrowly, the House of Representatives. We must strive to get back to an equilibrium to protect our democracy, and for our nation’s overall political health and stability. We need a counterweight to chaos.
Our polarized, two-party political system has long incentivized division as a way to win elections, but it’s not an effective way to govern. Truly governing for the entire country means we need to strive toward bipartisanship, while also calling out far-right extremism that is designed to hurt the most vulnerable. We must fight to protect California’s values when attacked by demagogues who sow division while trying to conquer their opponents.
Social media provides the opportunity for clickbait that garners headlines and likes, where misinformation metastasizes. When distrust and conspiracy theories are at every turn and finger pointing abounds, our balance suffers. Each of us can make a concerted effort to break away from the algorithm’s echo chamber and do our due diligence to discern the truth. We can each choose to not demonize “the other” side.
At the end of the day, I truly believe we have more in common as Americans than we disagree upon. Our north star in public service must be to focus on what will do the most good for the most people, particularly our neighbors most in need, and rebuild a politics of common sense for the common good. This usually involves making tough calls and compromise, which often means neither side is totally satisfied.
Recommended for you
So many challenges that our country faces — issues that directly impact families across America like the rising cost of housing, groceries and health care — don’t discern red states from blue states. We collectively face an increasing risk of catastrophic natural disasters and whether it’s hurricanes in the east or wildfires in the west, they are being worsened by climate change.
We cannot let federal assistance be unduly influenced by who is in the White House or the spread of falsehoods. And the suggestion that critical aid to victims of the Los Angeles wildfires should be withheld, leveraged or conditioned because California is a blue state, is totally unacceptable. A major reason I worked to earn a seat on the influential House Committee on Energy and Commerce this Congress is to work on policies to tackle the climate crisis, a challenge on which San Mateo County and California have led, and to build an economy that can work for everyone.
Now entering my second term in Congress, I’m interested in working with anyone, regardless of party, who is genuinely interested in solving problems for hardworking Americans. There is strength in unity, collaboration and balance. And achieving balance means fending off extremism.
I had the great privilege of gathering in the Washington National Cathedral earlier this month as the world paid tribute to President Jimmy Carter, a leader who, particularly in his post-presidency, demonstrated a balanced approach to living. He committed himself to making the world a better place through his tireless efforts to ensure people had a safe place to call home, monitoring elections and helping to eradicate disease. His work was not as an individual but was in partnership with a multitude of others. It was a balanced effort with people who each played a role in achieving success.
On the day of his funeral, Democrats and Republicans alike gathered under the cathedral’s arches illuminated by colorful stained glass. It was a coming together of people who put aside their differences to warmly connect with each other. It reminds us as a divisive second Trump presidency commences, that civility, while elusive, still can exist. With sustained and determined effort, we can return to a better, more bipartisan, balanced era of American politics. That too is indispensable.
Kevin Mullin represents California’s 15th Congressional District in the U.S. House of Representatives.
Mr. Mullin, you know what our founders would be thinking? Why would a U.S. President, President Biden, allow 12 million illegal immigrants into the United States of America? They would also wonder why Kevin Mullin voted AGAINST "Republican Representative Nancy Mace's bill that would ensure undocumented immigrants convicted of sex offenses are deported or deemed inadmissible to the country". The reason you voted against the bill was because the bill was submitted by a Republican, and your editorial is simply blowing hot air about middle ground because you are a sore loser. What will it take before you support Americans over your far left freak democrat party? A party who supports boys in girls bathroom and illegal immigrant criminals? Do you need your wife or family member to be sexually assaulted by an illegal immigrant before you put America first? Thousands of Americans have been sexually abused and murdered by illegal immigrants and you don't CARE!
Thank you Rep. Mullin, for a thoughtful take on what will be a very difficult upcoming Congressional session. With a convicted felon in office, who yesterday pardoned hundreds who stormed our Capitol and beat police officers, who welcomed the Proud Boys to march with his name proudly displayed, and whose immigrant shadow president Elon flashed the Nazi salute, it will be hard to "work across the aisle" with those who have abandoned their principles to support him. And who, despite their support of this criminal administration, have the vapors when you use the word "divisive." But I believe in you, and I believe you will strive to do the best for all of us in the challenging times ahead. Godspeed.
Folks, if you want an example of someone talking out of both sides of their mouth, read Mr. Mullin’s guest perspective. Mr. Mullin pens almost 700 words talking about balance and bipartisanship and yet with one adjective, “divisive,” completely undermines his opening essay trying to sell bipartisanship. Hey Mr. Mullin, if you’re serious about bipartisanship, why use the word “divisive”? It appears you only talk the talk about bipartisanship, but you’re not willing to walk the walk.
BTW, why did you vote Nay on initial passage of the Laken Riley Act? Are you not interested in arresting illegal aliens for criminal offenses? Or should I say “more” criminal offenses since crossing the border illegally is already a crime? Let’s see how you vote on the upcoming final passage for the Laken Riley Act. A number of House Democrats are interested in bipartisanship. Will one word, “divisive,” rule them all? I predict you’re going to spurn bipartisanship and vote Nay on a common sense bill. Make the effort to walk the walk, not just talk the talk.
Oh Kevin, you are one of the most divisive politicians in Congress, with your copy-paste statements of Dem talking points demonizing everything you disagree with as "far right".
Do you have any issue with the far-left control of the California legislature and executive branch, or is "balance" only needed when it is Republicans in control?
Did you have a problem with Biden issuing executive orders that he KNEW were unconstitutional (Student loan forgiveness, OSHA vaccine mandate)? (And yes, before the usual suspects scream BUT TRUMP, I have an issue with some of what Trump did in this regard as well, we should not be ruled by executive order and need to have less of this and more of Congress passing laws where change is needed.)
Also, please provide data that shows natural disasters are being "worsened by climate change." Just repeating something doesn't make it true... I expect that of the recent high school student columnist but a sitting member of Congress should be held to a higher standard.
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(4) comments
Mr. Mullin, you know what our founders would be thinking? Why would a U.S. President, President Biden, allow 12 million illegal immigrants into the United States of America? They would also wonder why Kevin Mullin voted AGAINST "Republican Representative Nancy Mace's bill that would ensure undocumented immigrants convicted of sex offenses are deported or deemed inadmissible to the country". The reason you voted against the bill was because the bill was submitted by a Republican, and your editorial is simply blowing hot air about middle ground because you are a sore loser. What will it take before you support Americans over your far left freak democrat party? A party who supports boys in girls bathroom and illegal immigrant criminals? Do you need your wife or family member to be sexually assaulted by an illegal immigrant before you put America first? Thousands of Americans have been sexually abused and murdered by illegal immigrants and you don't CARE!
Thank you Rep. Mullin, for a thoughtful take on what will be a very difficult upcoming Congressional session. With a convicted felon in office, who yesterday pardoned hundreds who stormed our Capitol and beat police officers, who welcomed the Proud Boys to march with his name proudly displayed, and whose immigrant shadow president Elon flashed the Nazi salute, it will be hard to "work across the aisle" with those who have abandoned their principles to support him. And who, despite their support of this criminal administration, have the vapors when you use the word "divisive." But I believe in you, and I believe you will strive to do the best for all of us in the challenging times ahead. Godspeed.
Folks, if you want an example of someone talking out of both sides of their mouth, read Mr. Mullin’s guest perspective. Mr. Mullin pens almost 700 words talking about balance and bipartisanship and yet with one adjective, “divisive,” completely undermines his opening essay trying to sell bipartisanship. Hey Mr. Mullin, if you’re serious about bipartisanship, why use the word “divisive”? It appears you only talk the talk about bipartisanship, but you’re not willing to walk the walk.
BTW, why did you vote Nay on initial passage of the Laken Riley Act? Are you not interested in arresting illegal aliens for criminal offenses? Or should I say “more” criminal offenses since crossing the border illegally is already a crime? Let’s see how you vote on the upcoming final passage for the Laken Riley Act. A number of House Democrats are interested in bipartisanship. Will one word, “divisive,” rule them all? I predict you’re going to spurn bipartisanship and vote Nay on a common sense bill. Make the effort to walk the walk, not just talk the talk.
Oh Kevin, you are one of the most divisive politicians in Congress, with your copy-paste statements of Dem talking points demonizing everything you disagree with as "far right".
Do you have any issue with the far-left control of the California legislature and executive branch, or is "balance" only needed when it is Republicans in control?
Did you have a problem with Biden issuing executive orders that he KNEW were unconstitutional (Student loan forgiveness, OSHA vaccine mandate)? (And yes, before the usual suspects scream BUT TRUMP, I have an issue with some of what Trump did in this regard as well, we should not be ruled by executive order and need to have less of this and more of Congress passing laws where change is needed.)
Also, please provide data that shows natural disasters are being "worsened by climate change." Just repeating something doesn't make it true... I expect that of the recent high school student columnist but a sitting member of Congress should be held to a higher standard.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.