In my career at the San Mateo County Transit District, where I special-assisted and senior-advised, I occasionally observed that there are a lot of transit experts and very few of them work at the transit agency. Free advice abounds.
The advice is all the more, um, interesting because there are few things in government more complex than funding for transit. No public transit system in the United States operates at a net profit. Most assuredly, none of them breaks even from passenger fares alone. The average farebox recovery for the 50 biggest agencies was 35% in 2019, according to the Eno Center for Transportation; it dropped to 12.8% in 2021, and you know why.
Even in the best of times, transit systems get by on a multilayered agglomeration of local, regional, state and federal subsidies.
This leads us to the ongoing push for some kind of regional tax measure that will bail out BART, San Francisco Muni and Caltrain, each of which faces challenging funding shortfalls.
This has played out against a modicum of opposition and skepticism, and the continuing belief by public officials that San Mateo County once again is getting the short end of the stick.
It is a point I already have belabored — that the “major players” in the region treat San Mateo County like the colonies — so I see no need to pound it into submission.
It is hard to argue against the thinking behind the measure, although there are those who will be against any tax increase. But the need for regional unity is an opportunity for county leadership to assert itself, not just on the tax but on the larger grievances. San Mateo County should be treated like an equal partner in these, and all other, regional agreements.
The kind of oversight proposed by Assemblymember Diane Papan in a recent op-ed is a step in the right direction. Other people representing the county have been remarkably silent or all too eager to look good on a regional level.
We should expect more. The regional deal should include a guarantee that the partners to Caltrain — San Francisco and Santa Clara County — also will fully fund their share of operating and capital budgets, something at which they have balked year after year.
Recommended for you
POLITICS NEVER SLEEPS: A year ago, efforts were underway for a well-financed, well-backed challenge to Supervisor Noelia Corzo’s reelection to a second term in 2026.
And then along came the controversy involving Sheriff Christina Corpus, in which Corzo showed critical leadership; any possible challenge has evaporated. Indeed, even among those who had worked against her in the 2022 election, there is widespread praise for her poise, her heartfelt presentations and her toughness as this continuing mess exploded onto the scene.
This is most apparent in the midyear campaign finance reports in which the first half of 2025 serves as a runway for those who might seek office in 2026.
Corzo reported raising $28,973, and finished June with $14,910 in her campaign treasury. Her list of donors still carries the veneer of the Peninsula’s progressives, although she has expanded beyond such stalwarts. Notable donors include: former county supervisor Warren Slocum, $135; state Sen. Scott Wiener, $100; and former San Mateo Councilmember Amourence Lee, $1,000.
No candidate has opened a committee to challenge Corzo.
Supervisor David Canepa has continued to raise money through his 2024 reelection committee, even though he is termed out on the board. The safe assumption is that the funds are a precursor to a run in 2026 for chief elections officer and assessor-county clerk-recorder. He raised $15,938 and finished June with $15,655 in cash on hand. Seven donors gave him $1,000, including his county aide, Bill Silverfarb, and Daly City Councilmember Juslyn Manalo, who already is running for Canepa’s seat in 2028. … Mark Church, the current county assessor-county clerk-recorder, has done nothing — no fundraising, no filings — since his last reelection in 2022.
The busiest race is for San Mateo County superintendent of schools between Hector Camacho, an executive in the County Office of Education, which the superintendent runs, and Chelsea Bonini, a trustee on the County Board of Education, to whom the superintendent reports.
Camacho has jumped out to a substantial lead in the money race, raising $54,269 to Bonini’s $11,869. Camacho finished June with $52,278 in his campaign treasury; Bonini had $8,598. Bonini raised her money from longtime progressive allies. Camacho’s donors represent a broader base of the county’s political mainstream. His notable donors included former South San Francisco Councilmember and North County doyenne Karyl Matsumoto, $5,900; and outgoing Superintendent Nancy Magee, $1,250 and her predecessor, Anne Campbell, $500. Corzo also gave Camacho $1,250.
Mark Simon is a veteran journalist, whose career included 15 years as an executive at SamTrans and Caltrain. He can be reached at marksimon@smdailyjournal.com.
Thanks for your column today, Mr. Simon. What’s missing from your farebox recovery numbers are the numbers for BART, Muni, and Caltrain. And in the end, does it really matter? Let’s pick on BART this time… Per this linked article from another contributor highlighted regularly at the DJ (https://calmatters.org/commentary/2025/06/bay-area-transit-budget/), BARTs payroll soared as ridership declined. As I always say, with support from the linked article, taxpayer funds from proposed taxes will mostly, if not all, go towards paying ever-increasing salaries, pensions, and benefits. Vote NO on any measures seeking to add more money to redistribute to transportation employees. If you change your mind in the future, don’t worry, these transportation agencies will ask you for more money in the future, over and over again.
Terence, do you ride SamTrans 7 days a week? Some of us do. The average recent rider, as they climb the 2-4 steps to get up onto the bus platform are already thinking about how they can get away with 'getting a free ride'.
I have heard "Hey man, I'm only going to the next stop" - "I don't have any money" - "Can I please have a Courtesy Ride" - "I left my wallet at home".
Kids can be the worst, so I have observed. Why? Well, they're wearing 800-dollar Jordans, have a $2000 dollar Apple Cell phone, are eating a 5-dollar pastry and drinking a 20-ounce 5-dollar Frappuccino. Note the food is illegal and well posted. Note: What happens to the food? Drivers look the other way as its spilled-on people sitting down minding their own business. Drivers when asked say: Two reasons: Career burnout + they MUST make their Run Times mandated by management or they get docked, so the less conversation when people board the faster, they can complete their Runs. Note: Bus run times are formulated by indoor employees using of all things as GOOGLE to formulate point A to B and so on. Do the indoor stat geeks consider traffic or weather? No.
Also, the kids wearing expensive outerwear, footwear and carrying on expensive food - if they do pay, slide a 1-dollar bill into the faire box even though the faire has been $1.10 for many, many years. Even sadder are the fact that kids can go to their school office and get their own (free) Clipper Card - OR - a 40-dollar summer card - but choose not to. Sitting and watching kids (trying) to board with their own Blue Clipper card that has no money loaded on it means the faire box will make various distinctive tones telling the kid and everyone sitting behind that "YOUR Clipper card is Empty". Note: It doesn't work until they inform their parents to reload *my* card. Do most of them notify their parents? That would be a negative.
PS: Do the kids eventually start bringing a DIME to complete the $1.10 cash faire?
Thanks for your reply, JustMike650, and for detailing your experiences traveling on SamTrans. If our so-called officials won’t help to enforce laws regarding those illegally crossing the border and instead, shield them, why would enforcement of fares rate any higher? Besides, transit union operators get paid the same whether folks pay their fare or not or if there are no passengers. These folks can count on our so-called officials to float tax increase proposals every now and then to continually pay for ever-increasing raises, pensions, and benefits, and of course, expansion of BART when ridership is declining.
Let's not forget that SamTrans' revenue is secured at 95% by Sales Tax Measures and bridge tolls. The SamTrans board and staff could basically increase service and provide FREE rides for everyone in this county. Absolutely no problem.
Unfortunately SamTrans leadership is using that revenue for all kinds of 'Reimagination' instead of good customer service. Rico E. Medina and David Canepa (both SamTrans board members) for example have helped to reroute public transit funding in some of their other positions (MTC and SMCTA). On the other hand a million dollar project to bring more bus shelters to this county has so far lead to ZERO new bus shelters.
If the SamTrans board members were 'friends of public transit' the agency wouldn't be sabotaged from the top like this.
When voting in the next election, I always check a candidate's endorsements. It appears that Corzo is endorsed by the ultra left, Weiner, etc. So, if we have left any brains at all, vote for her challenger. Corzo will never see a tax that she does not like and will vote based on her personal political convictions regardless of her constituents' preferences.
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(5) comments
Thanks for your column today, Mr. Simon. What’s missing from your farebox recovery numbers are the numbers for BART, Muni, and Caltrain. And in the end, does it really matter? Let’s pick on BART this time… Per this linked article from another contributor highlighted regularly at the DJ (https://calmatters.org/commentary/2025/06/bay-area-transit-budget/), BARTs payroll soared as ridership declined. As I always say, with support from the linked article, taxpayer funds from proposed taxes will mostly, if not all, go towards paying ever-increasing salaries, pensions, and benefits. Vote NO on any measures seeking to add more money to redistribute to transportation employees. If you change your mind in the future, don’t worry, these transportation agencies will ask you for more money in the future, over and over again.
Terence, do you ride SamTrans 7 days a week? Some of us do. The average recent rider, as they climb the 2-4 steps to get up onto the bus platform are already thinking about how they can get away with 'getting a free ride'.
I have heard "Hey man, I'm only going to the next stop" - "I don't have any money" - "Can I please have a Courtesy Ride" - "I left my wallet at home".
Kids can be the worst, so I have observed. Why? Well, they're wearing 800-dollar Jordans, have a $2000 dollar Apple Cell phone, are eating a 5-dollar pastry and drinking a 20-ounce 5-dollar Frappuccino. Note the food is illegal and well posted. Note: What happens to the food? Drivers look the other way as its spilled-on people sitting down minding their own business. Drivers when asked say: Two reasons: Career burnout + they MUST make their Run Times mandated by management or they get docked, so the less conversation when people board the faster, they can complete their Runs. Note: Bus run times are formulated by indoor employees using of all things as GOOGLE to formulate point A to B and so on. Do the indoor stat geeks consider traffic or weather? No.
Also, the kids wearing expensive outerwear, footwear and carrying on expensive food - if they do pay, slide a 1-dollar bill into the faire box even though the faire has been $1.10 for many, many years. Even sadder are the fact that kids can go to their school office and get their own (free) Clipper Card - OR - a 40-dollar summer card - but choose not to. Sitting and watching kids (trying) to board with their own Blue Clipper card that has no money loaded on it means the faire box will make various distinctive tones telling the kid and everyone sitting behind that "YOUR Clipper card is Empty". Note: It doesn't work until they inform their parents to reload *my* card. Do most of them notify their parents? That would be a negative.
PS: Do the kids eventually start bringing a DIME to complete the $1.10 cash faire?
That would be a No.
Thanks for your reply, JustMike650, and for detailing your experiences traveling on SamTrans. If our so-called officials won’t help to enforce laws regarding those illegally crossing the border and instead, shield them, why would enforcement of fares rate any higher? Besides, transit union operators get paid the same whether folks pay their fare or not or if there are no passengers. These folks can count on our so-called officials to float tax increase proposals every now and then to continually pay for ever-increasing raises, pensions, and benefits, and of course, expansion of BART when ridership is declining.
Let's not forget that SamTrans' revenue is secured at 95% by Sales Tax Measures and bridge tolls. The SamTrans board and staff could basically increase service and provide FREE rides for everyone in this county. Absolutely no problem.
Unfortunately SamTrans leadership is using that revenue for all kinds of 'Reimagination' instead of good customer service. Rico E. Medina and David Canepa (both SamTrans board members) for example have helped to reroute public transit funding in some of their other positions (MTC and SMCTA). On the other hand a million dollar project to bring more bus shelters to this county has so far lead to ZERO new bus shelters.
If the SamTrans board members were 'friends of public transit' the agency wouldn't be sabotaged from the top like this.
When voting in the next election, I always check a candidate's endorsements. It appears that Corzo is endorsed by the ultra left, Weiner, etc. So, if we have left any brains at all, vote for her challenger. Corzo will never see a tax that she does not like and will vote based on her personal political convictions regardless of her constituents' preferences.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.