While in high school, for reasons we do not need to go into here, I wandered away from a crushingly boring study hall in the library for several days. Actually, it may have been weeks.
This may sound odd, but I didn’t go anywhere. I stayed at the school, drifting in and out of other classes. Even odder, I ended up teaching a freshman English class for a while. In those days, classes were divided into College Prep and whatever the other one was called. I taught the other one.
It was not exactly English for dummies. But while the College Prep class, which I also had wandered into, was dissecting the symbolism of “The Old Man and the Sea” (Jesus was known as the “fisher of men.”), the class I was teaching was using workbooks, the contents of which were, shall we say, basic.
My high school days vastly preceded the profound changes in diversity that have occurred here in the past two decades. There was a scant handful of minorities in the school. The construct of all the classrooms was based on test scores, the school being sufficiently homogeneous to be oblivious to language differences or cultural or historical barriers.
However the selection might have been made, the reality of their categorization was not lost on the students, who took my presence, and the absence of the regular teacher, to complain they were bored. And to indicate they were well aware how their future had been laid out for them.
I think of this as the debate over educational equity continues to spread, and as the post-George Floyd push for diversity, equity and inclusion fades as a corporate priority.
No one wants to be left behind.
And there is the essence and the challenge in the equity debate: Does the effort to lift up some bring down others? Does it have to?
I believe we can all agree that this nation has a long history of systematic denial of equal opportunities, particularly at our schools. The flip side of that same coin has been the advantages that have come historically from being born in the right ZIP code, under ideal circumstances, including good schools.
The remedy has been equity, which generally is defined as fairness and justice. It is important to note both — justice having a value that extends beyond simple fairness. Equity is distinguished from equality, and has been implemented as a blanket expectation that everyone should be treated the same. For all I know, this may be equity. It may even be some form of justice, but I am unsure if it qualifies as fairness.
Recommended for you
Fairness is a fundamentally American notion. It is why we love sports and expect the games we enjoy to be conducted in an environment of fairness. But we also accept certain kinds of fair advantages. In basketball, if someone is taller or faster that is a fair advantage.
Schools are not supposed to be competitive environments, but we all know they are, especially in the highly charged and ambitious atmosphere of the Peninsula.
It would be unreasonable to expect a 7-foot-tall basketball player to play shorter, or to require a faster player to run slower. Is it reasonable to expect the same from an advanced math student? Is that what it means to eliminate advanced math classes at a local high school and have everyone take the same level of math? Is it benefiting those students who would not qualify for the advanced classes? Is it holding back those students who are prepared for the advanced work — for whatever reason?
Clearly, local school districts have embraced equity and it permeates some classrooms with a studied determination that every student get exactly the same treatment.
More interesting, perhaps, is the emergence of a parent/student/teacher campaign to restore the advanced classes at the high schools of the Sequoia Union High School District.
It has been three years since the murder of George Floyd by a Minneapolis police officer and a national push for reforms and reshaped attitudes.
The incident and subsequent reaction shifted momentum to progressives who long carried equity as a banner and as an antidote to systemic injustice.
The momentum, it appears, may be shifting when opposition to local school board actions becomes organized and intentional.
As must be painfully obvious, it’s hard for me to find a comfortable place in this debate. I know I want our schools to be the rising tide that lift all boats. I know I want no one denied the opportunity to excel as their talents and hard work will allow.
I know I want no one denied the benefits of their fair advantage.
Mark Simon is a veteran journalist, whose career included 15 years as an executive at SamTrans and Caltrain. He can be reached at marksimon@smdailyjournal.com.
Hey Mark, just pile it on. "this nation has a long history of systematic denial of equal opportunities, particularly at our schools." Why not provide the ones who lack initiative with another reason to blame the system? As a former teacher you ought to know that thousands of immigrants, like myself, found a way to get educated and become a productive member of our society. I just don't buy your argument. It is mostly an issue of leading a horse to water but you cannot make it drink. I was a mentor at a local HS and was aghast at the lack of interest among several students in pursuing a viable career. But, there were those who knew where to go and they did not need my coaching or your excuses.
Equity is NOT about bringing the rich side down to lift the poor side up.
Equity is about STOPPING the rich side from stealing the money that should be going to the poor side.
San Mateo and Redwood City school districts are outstanding examples for this.
When a society makes Education mandatory for all, they are taking on the responsibility of teaching EVERYBODY - no excuses can be made. Hence kids need to be evaluated if they require SPED, kids need to be evaluated if they are hanging behind and money should go to these causes. This is actually happening on Federal and State Level it's just that School Districts and Universities are refusing to take on that responsibility.
The worst school districts are those with Magnet Schools like North Star Academy or Orion (Redwood City), Park Elementary or Montessori (San Mateo) or Stevenson (Mountain View). These schools were created by the rich and for the rich. The experiment with these kinds of schools stopped 25 years ago and yet these schools still exist and need to be paid for.
So to pay for these Magnet-Schools-For-The-Rich those kids with low-income background or special education background are sitting in classroom of 30-35 instead of classrooms of 10-15 where they could actually learn something.
And then superintendents and other uninformed people blame the parents.
This "problem" has a simple solution: STOP doing competitive sports in high schools and universities.
It's not part of "Education", in fact the cost are so enormous that it takes away from Education. This should be handled by sports teams and organizations like AYSO and others.
And by taking it out of schools and universities, dirty old man can stop fantasizing about "fairness and equity".
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(4) comments
Hey Mark, just pile it on. "this nation has a long history of systematic denial of equal opportunities, particularly at our schools." Why not provide the ones who lack initiative with another reason to blame the system? As a former teacher you ought to know that thousands of immigrants, like myself, found a way to get educated and become a productive member of our society. I just don't buy your argument. It is mostly an issue of leading a horse to water but you cannot make it drink. I was a mentor at a local HS and was aghast at the lack of interest among several students in pursuing a viable career. But, there were those who knew where to go and they did not need my coaching or your excuses.
The author really should know better by now.
Equity is NOT about bringing the rich side down to lift the poor side up.
Equity is about STOPPING the rich side from stealing the money that should be going to the poor side.
San Mateo and Redwood City school districts are outstanding examples for this.
When a society makes Education mandatory for all, they are taking on the responsibility of teaching EVERYBODY - no excuses can be made. Hence kids need to be evaluated if they require SPED, kids need to be evaluated if they are hanging behind and money should go to these causes. This is actually happening on Federal and State Level it's just that School Districts and Universities are refusing to take on that responsibility.
The worst school districts are those with Magnet Schools like North Star Academy or Orion (Redwood City), Park Elementary or Montessori (San Mateo) or Stevenson (Mountain View). These schools were created by the rich and for the rich. The experiment with these kinds of schools stopped 25 years ago and yet these schools still exist and need to be paid for.
So to pay for these Magnet-Schools-For-The-Rich those kids with low-income background or special education background are sitting in classroom of 30-35 instead of classrooms of 10-15 where they could actually learn something.
And then superintendents and other uninformed people blame the parents.
Mark, since you brought up fairness and equity, why are men / boys now allowed to compete in women's sports?
This "problem" has a simple solution: STOP doing competitive sports in high schools and universities.
It's not part of "Education", in fact the cost are so enormous that it takes away from Education. This should be handled by sports teams and organizations like AYSO and others.
And by taking it out of schools and universities, dirty old man can stop fantasizing about "fairness and equity".
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.