SACRAMENTO — California lawmakers will consider altering an $11.1 billion water bond on the November ballot in an effort to deflect criticism that private corporations stand to benefit.
At issue is a provision in the bond that opponents say could allow private companies to partially own, operate and profit from water projects built with public money.
Sabrina Lockhart, a spokeswoman for Republican state Sen. Dave Cogdill, said Friday the Legislature wants to make "crystal clear” that public money can be used only for the public’s benefit.
The bill, AB2775, would ensure that bond money for dams, reservoirs and water banks only go to joint power authorities made up of public agencies. It is scheduled to be heard Tuesday by the Senate Natural Resources Committee.
Lawmakers placed the bond on the November ballot as part of a legislative package intended to overhaul how Californians store, use and transport water. If it passes, a now-defunct California Water Commission appointed by the governor will be given full authority to allocate $3 billion in funds to storage projects.
As it is currently written, some of that money could go to a Joint Powers Authority that has private members to oversee a dam or other storage project. One example might be the Kern Water Bank, once owned by the state but now controlled by Paramont Farms, which is owned by Hollywood billionaire Stuart Resnick.
Recommended for you
Defenders of the provision argue that private companies, which would be called upon to match state bond dollars on water projects, are essential to ensuring dams ultimately get built in California.
"If private entities can’t be a part of the JPA managing the reservoir, they are a lot less inclined to invest in the storage project,” Assemblyman Bill Berryhill, R-Ceres, said in a statement. "That’s like a company asking investors to give them money for a start-up but not allowing them to be shareholders.”
Berryhill, who opposed the bond, urged lawmakers to instead revamp the measure and eliminate billions of dollars of pork that they inserted in the final days to win the needed support in the Legislature.
Jim Metropulos, an advocate at Sierra Club California, said the proposed joint powers authority fix would not buy his organization’s support of such a costly bond as the state struggles with its finances.
"The $11.1 billion bond is the largest bond ever going before voters at a time of budget deficits,” Metropulos said.
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(0) comments
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.