Millbrae is moving forward with changing an obsolete city code that allows bicycles to be ridden on the sidewalk.
“I have gotten complaints about people riding bikes on the sidewalk, and didn’t realize it was not already prohibited,” Vice Mayor Reuben Holober said.
The City Council unanimously approved the introduction of an ordinance to modernize the municipal code, which was adopted in 1976 and currently lays out regulation for bicycle licenses and bicycle license plates — both of which are no longer offered by the city.
The state does not prohibit bicycles from being ridden on sidewalks, said Sam Bautista, Millbrae director of Engineering and Public Works, but local jurisdictions are free to regulate that action.
The ordinance, which currently addresses bicycles alone, will also expand the definition to mobility devices, which includes bicycles, electric bicycles, personal assistive mobility devices and electronically motorized boards and scooters.
“The new language also regulates these devices by prohibiting them from being ridden on sidewalks,” Bautista said.
Councilmembers chose to move forward with two additions to the ordinance based on how neighboring cities manage bicycle sidewalk riding. San Bruno and South San Francisco allow young bike riders — until ages 10 and 7, respectively — on sidewalks.
“Up to a certain age, it’s safer to ride on the sidewalk,” Holober said. “I would recommend and suggest putting in some type of age exemption for younger kids.”
Burlingame’s sidewalk bicycle ordinance is more expansive — the action is prohibited in business areas but allowed in residential areas unless pedestrians are present, in which case the cyclist must walk the bicycle.
Councilmember Bob Nguyen suggested the city add a similar stipulation allowing for the walking of bicycles on sidewalks.
“What Burlingame did is pretty good because it stipulates things you can do,” he said.
Several San Mateo County cities — including Foster City, Redwood City, San Carlos and Portola Valley — ban bicycles on sidewalks outright, with no exceptions.
(1) comment
Sidewalk riding is always a sign of clueless city leadership. It would not be necessary if the city council had done its job of building out the bike lane network in their city.
It is also not true that Redwood City bans bicycles on sidewalk outright. The former Mayor and police chief - during a council meeting - said they would not go after children up to 12 years riding on sidewalk. While this was more of an oral agreement - it hasn't been rescinded yet. The Interim Peninsula Bikeway leading through Redwood City is also using sidewalks and pedestrian crosswalks - it would be weird if you push it in one area and outlaw it in others.
Besides ... the city would have to deal with a counter lawsuit for not following through on their 2010 General Plan of providing "affordable transportation" in their city (aka bike lanes).
Several Bay Area cities are also experimenting with "Rideable Sidewalks", "Class 1 Bikeways", "walkable bikeways" - basically areas where pedestrians and cyclists are "sharing the sidewalk".
Either way the discussion in Millbrae is basically a sign of inferior leadership and the typical lack of execution skills we see from San Mateo Democrats all around. They never seem to get the right things done and always fall back to doing more harm.
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.