Jury selection begins Monday in the trial of the second man prosecuted in a San Bruno quadruple homicide that took place almost three years ago.
Raul Campos, now 20, was 17 years old when he allegedly participated in the Jan. 11, 2002 murder of four men at San Bruno's Evergreen Ridge apartment complex.
The victims, Javier Vaca, 21, Jose Alberto Munoz-Lopez, 21, Emilio Alba-Flores, 20, and Roberto Ramos-Guerra, 18, were shot execution style.
Campos and his friend Alfredo Valenzuela, 24, were arrested in Southern California in March of 2002, after investigators traced telephone calls from a cell phone found at the scene.
The prosecution contends that the men were killed over a drug dispute between Vaca and his alleged supplier Jorge "Chico" Hernandez.
Hernandez was reportedly killed in Mexico. A fourth suspect, Lazaro Perez, remains at large.
Campos and Valenzuela allegedly helped Hernandez with his drug business, regularly accompanying him on drug runs, according to prosecutor Al Giannini. On the day of the murders, the men went with Hernandez to commit a robbery and became involved in the violent killings, Giannini contends.
Recommended for you
On Sept. 2, jurors convicted Valenzuela of four counts of first-degree murder. In videotaped testimony, Valenzuela admitted being at the crime scene, but denied shooting the men or witnessing the murders.
However, Valenzuela's statements conflicted with jury testimony of his cousin Alvaro Acosta.
Acosta testified during Valenzuela's trial that Valenzuela bragged about fun-filled "road trips" he would take with Hernandez and Campos, who was nicknamed "The O.G.," for Original Gangster.
When Valenzuela returned from the fateful January road trip, he said he saw "The O.G." shoot one of the men, Acosta said.
Superior Court Judge Stephen Hall, who presided over the Valenzuela trial, agreed to allow Acosta's testimony in the Campos trial, but granted a defense motion prohibiting the use of Campos' nickname.
Hall granted the prosecution motion to admit a telephone call in which the defendant allegedly told his brother to destroy a piece of paper with the words "the plan" and "50,000" written on it. Hall additionally granted the prosecution motion to admit limited expert testimony by a San Mateo County Narcotics Task Force agent about how major drug dealers operate.
If convicted, Campos could face four life sentences in prison.
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO
personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who
make comments. Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd,
racist or sexually-oriented language. Don't threaten. Threats of harming another
person will not be tolerated. Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone
or anything. Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on
each comment to let us know of abusive posts. PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK. Anyone violating these rules will be issued a
warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be
revoked.
Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading.
To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.
We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.
A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!
(0) comments
Welcome to the discussion.
Log In
Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.