Highway 101 express lane revenue surpassed expectations, bringing in a little over $7 million between July and September last year, while questions remain over whether the project has mitigated congestion.

“Things are working well. This toll system is working as we anticipated,” Lacy Vong, policy program manager for the San Mateo County Express Lanes Joint Powers Authority, said. “We are seeing more revenue than we had anticipated when we did the budget for 2024.”

alyse@smdailyjournal.com

(650) 344-5200 ext. 102

Recommended for you

(4) comments

easygerd

The system is called "Inducing Demand" - even Kevin Costner knew "if you build it they will come".

Let's learn from Oakland what NOT to do

If you want more MLB, you build a stadium. If you want more people using public transit - you build better systems with better service. If you want more people to walk and bike, you build better sidewalks, bike lanes, safer intersections.

AND if you want more cars, you build more streets.

The Bay Area has seen plenty of highway widenings and intersection "improvements" like this. It didn't take long before the San Mateo Bridge was congested again - it used to be congested after 4pm, now that starts at 2pm. The intersection between 92 and 880 was never not congested. Bay Bridge is always congested and often in both directions at the same time.

"Improving" Intersections like 101/85 or 280/85 did nothing to reduce congestion - it made it worse. So will anything like 92/101 or any of the improved Interchanges planned in Burlingame or Redwood City.

They are all a waste of money. These lanes cost $600M and the toll will never pay for that - the public does. And the public is never asked.

Isn't it weird that you have to lobby, do letter signings, create a 503 org, have 50 people speak at the board if you want a crosswalk in front of a school? But highway widenings just happen to appear out of nowhere with no one ever asking for them.

And as long as there is no congestion, ridership on Caltrain and SamTrans stays low, which means they can complain about some fictional "Fiscal Cliff" (while buying new headquarters).

Not So Common

FasTrak does not reduce traffic or congestion, it actually creates congestion since 20-25% of the lanes are not used optimally. I see it every day because I drive approximately 2,000 miles a month up and down the Peninsula. Drivers in the #2 lanes somehow feel it is okay to drive 55 MPH in the No. 2 lane because they are not technically in the No. 1 fast lane. FasTrak is a complete failure unless success is giving more money to our government to waste.

Terence Y

Not So Common, a correct conclusion in your last sentence. It was never about reducing traffic or congestion – it was always about nickel and diming everyone to prop up pensions and benefits and more wasteful spending. As an added bonus, we have make-work construction projects to funnel more taxpayer money into union labor. I wouldn’t be surprised if there’s more air pollution than ever before. I know I don’t mind sitting in traffic spewing more carbon…

easygerd

"Economic Growth" and "Labor Contributions" are usually the reasons why these highway widenings are sold to voters. But voters really never asked for them.

And the wording: "Express lane use is above expectations" basically says "We are already too congested again. Express lanes are full."

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep the discussion civilized. Absolutely NO personal attacks or insults directed toward writers, nor others who make comments.
Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Anyone violating these rules will be issued a warning. After the warning, comment privileges can be revoked.

Thank you for visiting the Daily Journal.

Please purchase a Premium Subscription to continue reading. To continue, please log in, or sign up for a new account.

We offer one free story view per month. If you register for an account, you will get two additional story views. After those three total views, we ask that you support us with a subscription.

A subscription to our digital content is so much more than just access to our valuable content. It means you’re helping to support a local community institution that has, from its very start, supported the betterment of our society. Thank you very much!

Want to join the discussion?

Only subscribers can view and post comments on articles.

Already a subscriber? Login Here